Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • Testing Grounds
    The latest industry being outsourced to India is clinical drug trials. And any number of tragic things can happen on the way to your medicine cabinet.
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

School Board, Hillsborough County prefer legal bills to road costs

By By Michael Van Sickler, Times Staff Writer
In print: Tuesday, June 24, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT
Loading Video...
Loading...

TAMPA — A legal dispute over which governmental body should pay for street improvements near schools won't get cheaper for taxpayers.

The School Board has already spent about $30,000 in an effort to shed millions in transportation costs that it says Hillsborough County is unfairly demanding for new schools, said board attorney Tom Gonzalez.

The county has spent nearly $10,000, said assistant county attorney Robert Brazel, as it vies to get schools to pay a greater share of those costs.

After a Monday hearing, Circuit Court Judge Ralph Stoddard gave both governments a month to file closing arguments in what he said would be a "tuneup" to a likely appeal by the loser. Brazel said he also expects the fight to drag on.

"It's hard to imagine it stopping here," he said.

School Board officials say the legal costs are a good investment.

"When you think of a traffic signal being more than a half a million dollars, it puts (the legal bills) into perspective," said Cathy Valdes, the district's chief facilities officer.

One court expense was the testimony of Ethel Hammer, one of four expert witnesses the School Board paid.

Hammer, a former planner for Hillsborough County, is now a partner in a private firm. She was paid $180 an hour for about 10 hours of her time. She told the court Monday that the county doesn't have the authority to block new schools by ordering the district to pick up road costs.

"Some of this money is supposed to be spent to educate our children," Hammer said. "Should it go to the county instead? It's about the money."

Michael Van Sickler can be reached at (813) 226-3402 or mvansickler@sptimes.com.



[Last modified: Jun 25, 2008 04:42 PM]



Comments on this article
by Doug Jun 25, 2008 4:42 PM
Another example of our tax $ at work. This whole thing disgusts me & SDHC and County should be hanging their heads in embarrasment for their lack of safety concerns for citizens and students. Good work on reporting!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT