Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

A shocking diagnosis: breast implants 'gave me cancer'

Raylene Hollrah was 33, with a young daughter, when she learned she had breast cancer. She made a difficult decision, one she hoped would save her life: She had her breasts removed, underwent grueling chemotherapy and then had reconstructive surgery.

In 2013, six years after her first diagnosis, cancer struck again — not breast cancer, but a rare malignancy of the immune system — caused by the implants used to rebuild her chest.

"My whole world came crumbling down again," said Hollrah, now 43, who owns an insurance agency in Hermann, Mo. "I had spent the past six years going to the oncologist every three months trying to keep cancer away, and here was something I had put in my body to try to help me feel more like a woman, and it gave me cancer. I thought, 'I'm not going to see my kids grow up.' "

Her disease — breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma — is a mysterious cancer that has affected a tiny proportion of the more than 10 million women worldwide who have received implants. Nearly all the cases have been linked to implants with a textured or slightly roughened surface, rather than a smooth covering. Texturing may cause inflammation that leads to cancer. If detected early, the lymphoma is often curable.

The Food and Drug Administration first reported a link between implants and the disease in 2011, and information was added to the products' labeling. But the added warnings are deeply embedded in a dense list of complications, and no implants have been recalled. The FDA advises women only "to follow their doctor's recommended actions for monitoring their breast implants," a spokeswoman said in an email this month.

Until recently, many doctors had never heard of the disease, and little was known about the women who suddenly received the shocking diagnosis of cancer brought on by implants.

An FDA update in March that linked nine deaths to the implants has helped raise awareness. The agency had received 359 reports of implant-associated lymphoma from around the world, although the actual tally of cases is unknown because the FDA's monitoring system relies on voluntary reports from doctors or patients. The number is expected to rise as more doctors and pathologists recognize the connection between the implants and the disease.

Women who have had the lymphoma say that the attention is long overdue, that too few women have been informed of the risk and that those with symptoms often face delays and mistakes in diagnosis, and difficulties in receiving proper care. Some have become severely ill.

Implants have become increasingly popular. From 2000-2016, the number of breast augmentations in the United States rose 37 percent, and reconstructions after mastectomy rose 39 percent.

Annually, nearly 400,000 women in the U.S. get breast implants, about 300,000 for cosmetic enlargement and about 100,000 for reconstruction after cancer, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Allergan and Mentor are the major manufacturers. Worldwide, an estimated 1.4 million women got implants in 2015.

As late as 2015, only about 30 percent of plastic surgeons were routinely discussing the cancer with patients, according to Dr. Mark W. Clemens II, a plastic surgeon and an expert on the disease at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

"I'd like to think that since then we've made progress on that," Clemens said.

Late last year, an alliance of cancer centers, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, issued treatment guidelines. Experts agree that the essential first step is to remove the implant and the entire capsule of scar tissue around it. Otherwise, the disease is likely to recur, and the prognosis to worsen.

Not all women have been able to get the recommended treatment. Kimra Rogers, 50, a nursing assistant in Caldwell, Idaho, learned last May that she had lymphoma, from textured implants she had for more than 10 years. But instead of removing the implants and capsules immediately, her doctor prescribed six rounds of chemotherapy and 25 rounds of radiation. A year later, she still has the implants.

"Unfortunately, my doctor didn't know the first line of defense," Rogers said.

She learned about the importance of having the implants removed only from other women in a Facebook group for those with the disease.

Her health insurer, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana, covered the chemotherapy and radiation but has refused to pay for removal of the implants, and told her that her appeal rights were "exhausted." In a statement sent to the New York Times, a spokesman said, "Cosmetic breast implants are a contract exclusion, as are any services related to complications of the cosmetic breast implants, including implant removal and reconstruction."

Physicians dispute that reasoning, saying the surgery is needed to treat cancer. Her attorney, Graham Newman, from Columbia, S.C., said he was planning a lawsuit against the implant makers, and had about 20 other clients with breast-implant lymphoma from Australia, Canada, England and the United States.

Rogers has been unable to work for a year. If she has to pay to have the implants removed, it will mean taking out a $12,000 loan.

"But it's worth my life," she said.

Insurers generally cover implants after a mastectomy, but not for cosmetic enlargement, which costs $7,500 or more. Repeat operations for complications are also common, and usually cost more than the original surgery.

Diagnosis and treatment

Most of the cancers have developed from two to 28 years after implant surgery, with a median of eight. A vast majority occurred with textured implants.

Most implants in the United States are smooth. But for some, including those with teardrop shapes that would look odd if they rotated, texturing is preferable, because tissue can grow into the rough surface and help anchor the implant.

Researchers estimate that in Europe and the United States, 1 in 30,000 women with textured implants will develop the disease. But in Australia the estimate is higher: 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 1,000. No one knows why there is such a discrepancy.

What is inside the implant — silicone or saline — seems to make no difference: Case numbers have been similar for the two types. The reason for the implants — cosmetic breast enlargement or reconstruction after a mastectomy — makes no difference, either.

Symptoms of the lymphoma usually include painful swelling and fluid buildup around the implant. Sometimes there are lumps in the breast or armpit.

To make a diagnosis, doctors drain fluid from the breast and test it for a substance called CD30, which indicates lymphoma.

The disease is usually treatable and not often fatal. Removing the implant and the entire capsule of scar tissue around it often eliminates the lymphoma. But if the cancer has spread, women need chemotherapy and sometimes radiation.

"In the cases where we have seen bad outcomes, it was usually because they were not treated or there was a major delay in treatment, on the level of years," Clemens said. Doctors at MD Anderson have treated 38 cases and have a laboratory dedicated to studying the disease.

About 85 percent of cases can be cured with surgery alone, he said. But he added that in the past, before doctors understood how well surgery worked, many women were given chemotherapy that they probably did not need.

Case reports on the FDA website vary from sketchy to somewhat detailed and rarely include long-term follow-up. Some describe initial diagnoses that were apparently mistaken, including infection and other types of cancer. In some cases, symptoms lasted or recurred for years before the right diagnosis was made.

What exactly causes the disease is not known. One theory is that bacteria may cling to textured implants and form a coating called a biofilm that stirs up the immune system and causes persistent inflammation, which may eventually lead to lymphoma. The idea is medically plausible, because other types of lymphoma stem from certain chronic infections. Professional societies for plastic surgeons recommend special techniques to avoid contamination in the operating room when implants are inserted.

"It could also just be the immune system response to some component of the texturing," Clemens said. The rough surface may be irritating or abrasive.

Allergan implants seem to be associated with more cases than other types, possibly because they are more deeply textured and have more surface area for bacteria to stick to, he said. Allergan uses a "lost-salt" method that involves rolling an implant in salt to create texture and then washing the salt away. Other makers use a sponge to imprint texturing onto the implant surface.

Allergan is studying bacterial biofilms, and immune and inflammatory responses to breast implants, a spokesman said in an email. He said the company took the disease seriously and was working with professional societies to distribute educational materials about it.

Another possible cause is that some women have a genetic trait that somehow, in the presence of implants, predisposes them to lymphoma. Clemens said researchers were genetically sequencing 50 patients to look for mutations that might contribute to the disease.

Clemens was a paid consultant for Allergan from 2013-2015, but not for breast implants, and no longer consults for any company, he said.

A spokeswoman for Mentor said the company was monitoring reports about the lymphoma, and stood behind the safety of its implants.

'You have cancer again'

Hollrah had implants inserted in 2008 and felt fine for five years. Then in 2013, in a matter of days, her right breast tripled in size, filling painfully with fluid.

Her plastic surgeon removed the implant and replaced it. He had just read about the lymphoma, so to be on the safe side, he ordered CD30 testing. The results were positive.

"It's a moment I'll never forget," Hollrah said. "He said, 'You have cancer again, but it's not breast cancer.' "

On her doctor's recommendation, she saw Clemens, who removed the implants and surrounding tissue. Chemotherapy and radiation were planned but turned out to be unneeded, because tests found no spread of the cancer. She remains well, but returns to MD Anderson once a year for scans.

"I will be monitored for the rest of my life," she said.

She started a nonprofit, Just Call Me Ray, to help educate women about implants, and she participates in the Facebook group for women who have had the implant-related cancer.

Other women have needed more extreme treatment. Terri McGregor, 52, from North Bay, Ontario, had implant surgery in 2009. Six years later, after a routine mammogram with normal results, she felt lumps in her breast. Thinking the mammogram had ruptured her implants, her doctor removed and replaced them.

Because the tissue around the implants looked abnormal, he had it tested for CD30.

McGregor was stunned to learn she had the implant-associated lymphoma.

"I had no symptoms," she said.

The new implants had to be removed. Further tests led to another shock: The cancer was advanced. McGregor felt ashamed, because she had gotten the implants simply to improve her appearance.

"I brought this on myself. I brought this on my family," she said. "I really needed to work through that shame and guilt."

Two chemotherapy regimens failed. In March 2016, she was given three to six months to live. She sold her paving business but tried to keep the prognosis from her sons, who were 20 and 23.

There was one more option: a drug called brentuximab vedotin.

"I had four rounds," McGregor said. "The tumor on my chest literally disappeared."

Doctors then gave her high-dose chemotherapy, a transplant of her own stem cells and, in December, 15 radiation treatments.

The aggressive treatment has taken its toll. She used to shovel asphalt and hoist 50-pound bags of cement.

"Now I struggle to carry my laundry basket upstairs," she said.

She hopes the treatment has cured her.

Like Hollrah, she participates in the Facebook group, and thinks women need more information.

"Our motive is informed consent," she said. "We are a bunch of very unorganized women doing that because they have a passion for it, and how do you process your injustice feelings but to try to make change?"

Stacey Boone, 51, of Bradenton, also needed a stem-cell transplant, for lymphoma that had invaded her liver by the time it was diagnosed. The disease is in remission.

"It's been a long road," she said.

Kim Crespo, 49, from Palm Beach, said she had consulted several plastic surgeons in Florida who even in 2016 had never heard of lymphoma associated with breast implants. Nor had her gynecologist. She was treated for the disease at MD Anderson.

Vikki Radow, 46, of Los Angeles, said that when she had heard the FDA reported nine deaths from implant-associated lymphoma, "I said, ‘Oh, my God, my mother was one of those nine.'"

Radow's mother, Bettye C. Yaller, first received an implant about 30 years ago after a mastectomy for breast cancer. She had the implant removed and replaced a few times, and began to have swelling and pain in 2009 or 2010, Radow said.

Doctors diagnosed an infection, removed the implant and replaced it. In 2012, at 76, her mother became short of breath and had pain and swelling in her breast, a lump in her chest, and swollen lymph nodes in her chest and neck.

"It started the most wild goose chase I've ever been on," Radow said.

Her mother was hospitalized for two months, worsening steadily, as doctors struggled to determine what was wrong. In desperation, Radow's husband consulted a physician friend, who suggested testing for lymphoma — and the diagnosis was finally made. By then, Yaller was critically ill, on a ventilator.

She improved with chemotherapy and came home from the hospital.

When she was considered strong enough for surgery, she went back to the hospital to have the implant removed. Her heart stopped on the operating table. She was resuscitated but died two weeks later.

Radow described her mother as a vibrant, lively woman who line danced, took water aerobics classes, traveled, belonged to a book group and reveled in the company of her children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

Her mother had no idea that there was any cancer risk from implants, and told doctors that if she had known, she never would have wanted one, Radow said, adding, "My mother was robbed of the rest of her life."

What you need to know if you have breast implants

Nearly every case of the rare cancer that has been linked to breast implants — anaplastic large-cell lymphoma — involves those with a textured surface, not a smooth one, and most implants in the United States are smooth.

The Food and Drug Administration says women with implants who are not experiencing any problems with them should stick to routine care, and do not need to have the implants removed. But symptoms like breast pain, swelling, fluid buildup or lumps should not be ignored.

Not all doctors know how to treat problems from breast implants, according to Dr. Steven Teitelbaum, a plastic surgeon in Santa Monica, California. "If the doctor doesn't show a real fluency in this, see somebody else," he said. "You don't want someone who acts like it's nothing or seems confused."

To check for lymphoma, doctors use ultrasound (not a mammogram) to look for fluid, and then they drain the fluid and test it for a substance called CD30, which is a sign of the disease.

If the CD30 test is positive, MRI scans and other tests are usually needed to determine the stage of the cancer.

The first step in treatment should be to take out the implants — both, even if only one appears to be causing trouble — and to fully remove the capsules of scar tissue that form around them. If the capsules are not excised, the cancer may linger or recur, and the prognosis worsens.

Even if the implants were used for cosmetic reasons, some insurers cover the surgery to remove them if lymphoma develops, but the surgeon has to make the reason clear and choose the right diagnostic codes.

Doctors report that in about 85 percent of cases, the disease has not spread beyond the tissue around the implant, and surgery alone seems to cure it. Once the disease is cleared, some women even opt for new implants.

But if the lymphoma has spread, chemotherapy will be needed, and possibly radiation. A few women have had such aggressive cancer that they required high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell transplants. Worldwide, about a dozen women have died.

For women with implants and no problems, regular care should include routine mammograms, performed by a technician trained to deal with implants, according to the FDA. For women who have implants filled with silicone, routine care should also include MRI scans to check for implant rupture, with the first scan three years after the surgery and follow-up imaging every two years. But insurers may not cover the cost of these scans for women who got implants for breast augmentation, because such expenses are considered related to cosmetic surgery.

A shocking diagnosis: breast implants 'gave me cancer' 05/15/17 [Last modified: Monday, May 15, 2017 11:34am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

Copyright: For copyright information, please check with the distributor of this item, New York Times.

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Lightning: Jon Cooper takes unusual tact to create mistmatches

    Lightning Strikes

    Tampa Bay Lightning head coach Jon Cooper argues the called as his team gets a faceoff violation, leading to penalty and #Caps PP goal, during second period action at the Amalie Arena in Tampa Monday evening (10/09/17).DIRK SHADD   |   Times
  2. Editorial: A neighborhood under attack unites


    Three murders in two weeks understandably have Tampa's Seminole Heights neighborhood on edge. But Tampa police and residents are working together to find the killer and are connecting in ways that will strengthen the community in the long run. This is the best reaction to the tragedy of the three deaths, and it should …

    Seminole Heights residents came together in a candlelight vigil Sunday night to pay respect to the families and to demonstrate that they will not be cowed into staying indoors.
  3. Students at middle school pretend to rape black classmates on Snapchat


    The Snapchat had just about every offensive topic the middle school students could cram into a video clip: race-based simulated sexual assaults, profanity-laced slurs and repulsive language that shocked whoever the intended audience was - and, eventually, many more people.

    Students at a Virginia middle school pretended to rape other students on video, which was shared on Snapchat. Reports say white members of a football team enacted the rape scenes while in the locker room. This photo of a standard locker room is courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  4. Seminole Heights restaurants face struggles amid killings, post-Irma

    Food & Dining

    SEMINOLE HEIGHTS — The neighborhood's hip circle of popular, well-regarded restaurants is feeling the squeeze in the wake of a recent killing spree. And the timing is rough.

    Ella's American Folk Art Cafe. Times files
  5. St. Pete-Clearwater holding food, supply drive for hurricane refugees


    CLEARWATER — St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport and Allegiant Air are holding a food and supply drive for the Hispanic Outreach Center in Pinellas County. The event, which will benefit refugees displaced by Hurricane Maria, will be held Tuesday from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the airport at 14700 Terminal Blvd.

    St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport and Allegiant Air are hosting a food and supplies drive Tuesday for refugees displaced by Hurricane Maria. | [Times file photo]