Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Guest column | Al Mccray

Reason for red light cameras is abundantly green

In following the city of Temple Terrace's lead, Hillsborough County has installed traffic cameras at various locations. Are the first locations chosen based on the high revenue potentials or are they the most dangerous intersections?

Related News/Archive

As a sales pitch, the Sheriff's Office has a Youtube site showing near-misses at intersections.

In 2009, there were roughly 270,799 traffic tickets issued in Hillsborough County, according to the traffic division of the county clerk's office. Those tickets were written at a rate of 742 per day by uniformed officers. The amount generated was $35,008,391, but the county does not keep all this moola. Some of it is spread around the state to other counties. As a matter of law, surplus funds go elsewhere. That somewhat prevents jurisdictions from going crazy writing tickets.

Now enter the traffic camera system. The county keeps most of the money. A small fee is paid to the camera equipment vendor operators. This violation is governed by county code, rather than state law. Is this a clever way of making more money?

On the surface, it would appear that writing traffic tickets is a booming business in Hillsborough County. It's no wonder why ticketed motorists imagine that police vehicles are mere cash registers on wheels.

Some aspects of the new cameras are very confusing, as far as I'm concerned. On one hand, you won't get points on your driving record. On the other, it's a cash cow of revenue for the county. The fine is $125, plus $25 court cost. Is the point to prove that a particular vehicle ran the light without any regard as to who was behind the wheel? Or is the burden on the registered owner to prove that, "Hey, it was not me driving"?

There are definite problems with the system, as I saw firsthand during a traffic camera magistrate hearing last week. There was a big screen showing what the street camera saw. I observed as five of the names called never showed up. Maybe they'd paid the tickets already. The first person called, an elderly lady, was home in bed sick and blamed her son on the day of the infraction. She was told to fill out forms stating her story. Another man brought in his vehicle's tag plate. The video showed a pickup truck. He owns a compact car. The camera review company misread the tag number. This case was dismissed. Another female had her ticket dismissed. But the county did find one gentleman. His truck was shown running the light late one night. He is appealing the magistrate's order to pay $150.

So far, there have been 18,000 infractions, but only 4,000-plus qualified for citations after a careful review, according to the Sheriff's Office.

I don't know the exact amount of revenue to date from the camera-issued tickets yet, but it is bound to grow as the county's bean counters get intoxicated by this new revenue source.

I am straddling the fence on whether uniformed officers have a ticket quota. When it comes to traffic cameras, I sincerely believe it's definitely for revenue and not safety. We motorists know that. We are not fooled.

Cameras at intersections won't stop the red light runners, it will just generate revenue for the county.

If those traffic cameras are really for safety and not revenue, then why not give 100 percent of the proceeds to the United Way?

The county should just be truthful about traffic cameras and say, "Look, the county is in a financial jam. We need additional revenue."

It really doesn't matter how much of a safety spin they put on the traffic camera issue, it's about the money. It's just that plain and simple.

Al Mccray is a Tampa resident and freelance writer whose work occasionally appears in the Times. He can be reached at

Reason for red light cameras is abundantly green 04/01/10 [Last modified: Thursday, April 1, 2010 4:30am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Police: Uber driver's gun discharges during fight at Adventure Island in Tampa

    Public Safety

    TAMPA — An Uber driver's gun went off Sunday at Adventure Island during a fight between the driver and two passengers.

  2. Baker cautious on Pride politics


    Rick and Joyce Baker strode down Central Avenue Sunday amid rainbow flags, corporate booths, and blaring music of the St. Pete Pride Festival.

    St. Petersburg mayoral candidate Rick Baker chats Sunday with people at the St. Pete Pride Festival. As mayor, Baker did not sign a Pride parade proclamation, but now he says he would.
  3. Rays' bullpen stars lit up in loss to Orioles

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — Saturday it was the soft underbelly of the bullpen that let one get away from the Rays, incurring the wrath of the team's faithful followers, who wondered why the high-leverage guys weren't pitching.

    Rays closer Alex Colome, coming in with the score tied in the ninth, allows three runs in his second straight poor outing.
  4. Lightning among early suitors for defenseman Kevin Shattenkirk

    Lightning Strikes

    TAMPA — Lightning general manager Steve Yzerman said he planned to explore free agency for potential needs, which include bolstering his blue line and adding a wing or two.

    Defenseman Kevin Shattenkirk, who can be a free agent Saturday, counts the Lightning among his early suitors.
  5. Senate leaders try to appease members as support for health bill slips


    WASHINGTON — Senate Republican leaders scrambled Sunday to rally support for their health care bill, even as opposition continued to build outside Congress and two Republican senators questioned whether the bill would be approved this week.

    Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill on Thursday, is one of the five Republican senators who announced they cannot support the health care bill as drafted.