|
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Tampa sued to collect on 147-year-old promissory note worth millions
By
Janet Zink, Times Staff Writer
In print: Monday, March 17, 2008
|
Tampa issued a promissory note for $299.58 to pioneer storekeeper Thomas Pugh Kennedy on June 21, 1861. And his great granddaughter Joan Kennedy Biddle, 77, who has known about the note since she was a little girl, wants to collect with interest.
|
 |
|
[Special to the Times]
|
TAMPA — In the early months of the Civil War, the city of Tampa needed ammunition and other supplies to defend against attack but apparently was short on cash.
So it issued a promissory note for $299.58 to storekeeper Thomas Pugh Kennedy on June 21, 1861.
Kennedy's great-granddaughter says the city never made good on its loan. Now, Joan Kennedy Biddle and her family are suing to collect the payment plus 8 percent annual interest.
The total bill: $22.7-million.
"Obviously we came at a bad time because the city seems like they're trying to cut their budget," she said. "On the other hand, they're building the Riverwalk."
Attorney James Purdy filed the suit in the Hillsborough Circuit Court last week. He did not return calls for comment.
Biddle wouldn't give specifics on why she decided to sue now, using as evidence a piece of paper that has been handed down as an heirloom for generations.
"This thing has been in the family since the date on the note, and it has never been repaid," said Biddle, 77. "My daddy told me, and I certainly believe him."
Tampa City Attorney David Smith said he doesn't consider the claim valid.
In legal documents, Biddle's attorney argues that the statute of limitations doesn't apply in the case because at the time the note was issued, the state had no such statute on such documents.
And Biddle pointed out that in the 1990s the federal government agreed to pay the Seminole tribe for land illegally taken in the 1820s.
But attorney John Grandoff said the city can defend against the case using the "doctrine of laches," which prevents claims from being made after an extraordinary passage of time.
"It's kind of how the court feels about whether it's been too long or not," Grandoff said. "It's total discretion on the judge's part."
Rodney Kite-Powell, curator at the Tampa Bay History Center, noted that the Tampa of 1861 is not the same city that exists today — literally.
Tampa was originally incorporated in 1855, but was abolished in 1869 in part because residents had no money to pay taxes, and the city had no money to pay its bills, Kite-Powell said. It was reincorporated in 1887.
At the time the note was issued, Tampa was a tiny town with about 800 residents, city limits that included just a portion of downtown. It also was home to Fort Brooke, where local Confederate soldiers were stationed.
Biddle's great-grandfather, Thomas Pugh Kennedy, was one of the city's most significant pioneers, Kite-Powell said.
He operated a store with business partner John Darling.
"Merchants are always important because they're the way people get stuff — from cannons to clothing and food," he said. "People really relied on these early merchants to supply people with what they needed."
Joan Kennedy Biddle grew up on Davis Islands and attended Plant High School. She moved to east Hillsborough in the 1960s and ran a lumber business with her late husband. She now owns a three-bedroom home in Brandon.
Biddle said she's known about the note since she was a little girl. "I showed it to the attorney, and he said it looked very interesting," she said. "It's strange that the thing has never been collected."
Times researcher John Martin contributed to this report. Janet Zink can be reached at jzink@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3401.
[Last modified: Mar 23, 2008 06:03 PM]
Comments on this article
|
by Anonymous
|
Mar 23, 2008 6:03 PM
|
|
This shows how many folks don't know what they are talking about. Ammendment 14 passed in 1868 doesn't apply to debts owed in 1861. Not that this will be payable.
Also - No differet from a 1920 stock certificate. If it has value it
|
|
by Alex
|
Mar 23, 2008 6:02 PM
|
|
Hey, if any of you have ever been to an antiques auction, you'd know that Confederate bills can go for thousands! If you ask me, giving her 20 thousand in CSA money is just as good as 23 million in USA money.
|
|
by Anonymous
|
Mar 23, 2008 6:02 PM
|
|
As for the Bankruptcy, I think the test is to see if the city paid any other debts off owed. If they did, and as amendment 14 probably won't apply (Note dated before amendment) then there may be precident to pay.
|
|
by Earl
|
Mar 23, 2008 6:02 PM
|
|
Is the note payable in US or Confederate dollars??
|
|
by Huckleberry
|
Mar 21, 2008 3:33 PM
|
|
Yes this was an Andy Griffith show. She is greedy. Pay her in Confederate money. The war been over more than 140 years. If the government pay her they may as well pay those seeking retribution in Dog Patch and Owls Hollar too.
|
|
by Steve M
|
Mar 21, 2008 3:05 PM
|
|
14th Amendment Sctn 4 ..nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, ... but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
|
|
by EB
|
Mar 21, 2008 1:20 PM
|
|
The city has stated Amendment 14 being a protection for this.
Amendment 14 was added to the constitution July of 1868 - 7 years after the note.
This is clearly a issue a Judge needs to decide. It may not be a cut and dry as many may thin
|
|
by Anonymous
|
Mar 21, 2008 1:20 PM
|
|
A Person finds stocks from the 1920s. They are from a company still in business. Do they discard them because they are old?
The first step is finding the validity of the document. And if she has an paid note, shouldn't the city show proof?
|
|
by maggie
|
Mar 21, 2008 1:19 PM
|
|
perhaps she plans to donate the money to the city so they can hire back all the employees they had to lay off. would her grandfather want her to put hardship on more people? sad.
|
|
by Matthew
|
Mar 21, 2008 1:19 PM
|
|
well seeing city went bankrupt in 1869 the note is as good as a stock (note) given by a company that goes bankrupt...nothing
|
|
by Robert
|
Mar 21, 2008 10:49 AM
|
|
She is stating that the only proof she has that the note was never repaid was that her father told her it wasn't, and she believed her father. Where are the business documents which would show whether it was repaid or not? Without those, no case
|
|
by Chris
|
Mar 21, 2008 10:07 AM
|
|
Some money is due but 8% interest is crazy since her father made no effort to collect the money 100 years ago. Adjusting for inflation it is worth about $7000. http://www.westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi
|
|
by tony
|
Mar 21, 2008 9:44 AM
|
|
I have a suggestion give this note to display in city hall forever. The city will give you the Keys to the City and
a lifetime pass to all the museums.
Just a suggestion...
|
|
by Sakred Kow
|
Mar 21, 2008 9:43 AM
|
|
Pay her $22.7 million?? Suuuuure. And while they're at it, why don't they approve slave reparations??
|
|
by Jason
|
Mar 21, 2008 9:43 AM
|
|
I happen to know Joan the lady from the story..and greedy is the last thing she is.Consider this...if you were in debt to the city wouldnt they sure as hell want their money back? So tell me why it doesnt work the other way around. Give her the money
|
|
by Eric
|
Mar 20, 2008 8:14 PM
|
|
Well since Florida was part of the Confederacy then she should get the money in useless Confederacy cash.....Now I would love to see her spend that.
|
|
by steve
|
Mar 20, 2008 3:33 PM
|
|
The loan was made to the City of Tampa (which still exists). It was signed by the Mayor. Does the City of Tampa renige on contractual agreements? Unfortunately for them, they owe the money.
|
|
by Roger
|
Mar 20, 2008 1:00 PM
|
|
Govt money promised was CSA money. Repay it in CSA money. (CSA - Confederate States of America) Oh Wait they lost! Have a nice day.
|
|
by PASCO PETE
|
Mar 20, 2008 12:54 PM
|
|
THIS IS SO STUPID PURDY SHOULD BE FORCED TO RETAKE THE FL. BAR EXAM. I BET HE WOULD FLUNK!!
|
|
by Charles Cummings
|
Mar 20, 2008 9:37 AM
|
|
This agreement was worthless then and it is worthless now. Put it on display in the History Center, call it a day, and let one of us include it as a citation in a graduate thesis.
|
|
by cancer
|
Mar 20, 2008 9:02 AM
|
|
Neat story, I will give her family 300 for the note. I only wish the confederate army had won.
|
|
by JK
|
Mar 19, 2008 8:16 PM
|
|
Statute of limitations, that's the law.
|
|
by Kat
|
Mar 19, 2008 8:13 PM
|
|
Five year statute of limitations on a promissory note, if the statute of limitations was in effect at the time. Otherwise, common law applies. Perhaps, there will be an equitable solution.
|
|
by Bob
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:28 PM
|
|
Way to go lady. Your grandpappy committs high treason against the United States, and you want to make the $ back. Classy...
|
|
by Brian
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:24 PM
|
|
>>And why do people think gov. money is like mana from heaven - as if it just materializes out of thin air?<<
It does materialize out of thin-air. The Fed prints it daily to bail out investement banks. Why not this lady t
|
|
by Joe
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:22 PM
|
|
Meh, loan was made in Confederate dollars, and thus needs to be repaid as such.
Current exchange rate: 0. Cheap loan to repay, even though it was nullified when the CSA dissolved.
|
|
by Dave
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:21 PM
|
|
The city should give her two grand for the document, then display it in a museum.
|
|
by LawGirl
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:08 PM
|
|
Unbelievable. The Courts are already working on a shoestring budget and she wants to clog it up with this stupid lawsuit. By the way, check out the 14th Amendment lady and fire your attorney for his lack of understanding it.
|
|
by Fools
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:08 PM
|
|
uhhhh, yeah, worthless.
All you people out there with "worthless" confederate money, send it to me.
|
|
by Sarah
|
Mar 19, 2008 5:06 PM
|
|
This note is a piece of history. It's priceless--literally--and should be in a museum. The family should be happy to have it, and happy to be a part of Tampa's history. This ridiculous lawsuit should be thrown out of cou
|
|
by jro
|
Mar 19, 2008 4:59 PM
|
|
seems to be a no-brainer. the note was made in 1861 - the city was abolished in 1869 . . . sorry great grand dad no money for you
|
|
by Linda
|
Mar 19, 2008 4:59 PM
|
|
OMG. This is a joke Right? What the flippin' world. Perhaps she is suffering from some type of mental illness, I mean come on now...This is beyond rediculous...and whoever her attorney is...you are even more so....way to much time on both your h
|
|
by tennesseenow
|
Mar 19, 2008 4:57 PM
|
|
"I showed it to the attorney, and he said it looked very interesting,"
cant blame him for trying
|
|
by JJ
|
Mar 19, 2008 4:48 PM
|
|
Just wondering did she retain Barry Cohen?
|
|
by Sammye
|
Mar 19, 2008 4:46 PM
|
|
It was a legal note..the city never paid it...its way past due WITH interest. IF it were reversed, the city govt would do their best to collect it..why shouldn't this family?
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|