Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Local Government
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message

Tropicana Field has a first date, not a proposal

By Howard Troxler, Times Columnist
In print: Tuesday, March 18, 2008


Social Bookmarking [+]
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

Today is a big day in the process of deciding whether the Tampa Bay Rays will get a new waterfront stadium in downtown St. Petersburg.

There's a 10 a.m. deadline for developers to give the city their proposals for what to do with the site of Tropicana Field, the existing stadium.

The idea is that the old stadium site will help pay for the new one, by being sold, redeveloped as private property, and added to the tax rolls.

So, here's hoping for all the best this morning.

Bring on the artists' renderings! Bring on the green space, the shops! Bring on the urban villages!

But let's be crystal clear about what today is not.

Today is not the day that "proves" the stadium idea will "work." We'll still be a long way from that.

The only thing today will show is whether there are any companies with any ideas that might work.

I do not mean to sound like a party-pooper. I want the plan to work. But at times like these, St. Petersburg is prone to being swept off its feet like a teenager with a crush.

How 20 years fly! Consider an article in this newspaper dated March 20, 1988:

ST. PETERSBURG — The Bay Plaza Cos. plan to build a Mediterranean village of shops, offices and restaurants in downtown St. Petersburg and finish by 1992.

Company officials say it will be an ornate, "food and fashion" mall featuring two nationally known department stores and at least a dozen new restaurants near the waterfront. …

Company president Neil Elsey predicted Friday that the Bay Plaza partners actually will build all the projects in three years, starting by January 1989 and ending in 1992.

This gasbaggery was enough for St. Petersburg to fork over its downtown, its property, its rights of way and its historical heritage. And though it all came to naught, the city, in pathetic denial, allowed it to drag on for years.

I am sure that the companies making proposals today are first-rate and honorable.

But that will not be enough. Nothing will be enough except the eventual contract.

Here is what that contract ought to say:

The taxpayers will never have to contribute any other money.

I don't care if the stadium gets only half-built and sits there rusting.

I don't care if World War III breaks out in the meantime, or if the Tropicana developer files Chapter 11, Chapter 7, or Chapter Zillion.

Never, ever, not one dime.

Here is what would be good: a vault filled with $300-million in platinum bars, with the city holding the only key, to be used the first time that the Tropicana site fails to generate the required revenue.

I would also like the developers' firstborn children, and their grandchildren's piggy banks. I'd like insurance policies and performance bonds, too.

That's the attitude that St. Petersburg should maintain as it opens the envelopes.

But if history is any guide, by the end of the day, city leaders will be gushing about how "excited" they are. And they will be scrawling the name of the developer in their school notebooks, surrounded by little hearts, and sighing.

• • •

Got a question or comment about current events? I'm holding a live chat on TroxBlog from noon to 1 p.m. today. Look under the "Blogs" menu at www.tampabay.com.



[Last modified: Mar 24, 2008 10:43 AM]



Comments on this article
by Joe Mar 24, 2008 10:43 AM
How about worrying about crime and policy so that Saint Petersburg does not end up like Detroit? I hear they got some new fancy stadiums too! Ha ha ha
by Fred Mar 19, 2008 8:13 PM
The Rays "contribution" is OUR money - they are just paying their rent in advance at a huge discount. Then ALL the new taxes from the new development go to the new stadium, NOT to city services! ITS ALL PUBLIC MONEY hiding under the sh
by Betsi Mar 19, 2008 8:13 PM
Has anyone stopped to think if there's a demand for redevelopment of the Trop area? Central Ave. isn't exacly booming and now is not a good time to flood the market with more housing, more shops and more offices! Maybe with sub-prime f
by Just say No to hogs Mar 19, 2008 8:13 PM
Show me the money! Hines only offered $50 million. That leaves $250 million. Who takes out that loan (bond debt) to pay construction? No way am I making rich guys richer with city resources! Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered! Time to slaug
by John Mar 19, 2008 8:13 PM
NO! The Trop lots can be developed now and the city gets half the revenues. If the Trop goes down, all the revenues go to the Rays new stadium and none to the city. Let them build whatever they want at Derby Lane and buy out their 20 year Trop lease.
by John Mar 19, 2008 4:57 PM
KD - I could give you three cities greatly improved by the construction of a downtown stadium, but since you only asked for one, check out Denver. Support the stadium! Tell your friends to do the same.
by pete Mar 19, 2008 1:11 PM
neil ripped us off and don't give them the ben of the doubt. these mugs are prob just as shadey. it's all about selling st pete the idea it's a real city and you keep buying it...floriduh
by rick Mar 19, 2008 1:10 PM
we have to build a new stadium or the rays w/sue us boo whoo...you are being set up people and your are going to be left with prop taxes now at 24. mills up to 40+mills,,,laught i wrote this before we went to 24mills to pay for the unvoted cap p
by rick Mar 19, 2008 1:10 PM
so they're entertaining proposals, yet not even a vote on the land to see if the elephant can move? sounds like the deal was already struck in the shadows suckers we are. i smell a rich rat. then it'll be they signed for the reconstruction
by JK Mar 18, 2008 4:13 PM
Not while we have Mayor "sign the city over to Sembler" Baker in City Hall.
by Winkler Mar 18, 2008 1:24 PM
First off I would like to point out that John Donson you need to get your facts straight the stadium will seat 34000. Why do all you old men want to knock down the dream of new and youger group of baseball fans let us have our stadium.
by Jason Mar 18, 2008 1:18 PM
Does anyone have an open mind anymore? I am interested to see the full proposal unveiled. The rays will not use public money for this project. Most of the close-minded people against it at this point have no idea of what's being proposed
by Jeff Mar 18, 2008 1:18 PM
Vote Yes, we need a solid franchise and too many good deals have slipped through our fingers. Mr. Donson, don't go if you don't want too.
by Mike Mar 18, 2008 1:18 PM
How can you already want to vote no when there is no plan in front of you. Quit being so closed minded!
by justme Mar 18, 2008 1:18 PM
I was at the Yankee Spring Training game on Sunday. People were passing out in the stands and this is only March. An outdoor stadium (covered or whatever) is not going to help with the heat & humidity of Florida. I will be voting NO
by KD Mar 18, 2008 1:14 PM
The thought of destroying our gorgeous, downtown with another horrendous sporting stadium to appease the greed of the already wealthy makes me sick. Name one city where this has been done that it actually contributed to the beauty.
by Wink Mar 18, 2008 1:10 PM
The stadium will seat 34000 and it will be about 15-20 degrees cooler then the outside temp. John Donson if you dont want to go then dont, keep your old butt at home. Its the younger generation who this renovation and stadium will benefit not yo
by Edward Mar 18, 2008 10:37 AM
Or Land O
by jumpin jack Mar 18, 2008 10:37 AM
Only Mayor Baker can salvage this stadium deal. The voters are not for it. He must use his bully pulpit to rally support and enthusiasm for this ill concieved billion dollar boondoggle.
by John Donson Mar 18, 2008 10:37 AM
Hey Andy & Stu! Just to let you know, I will not be sitting outside in 97 degree weather w/ 97% humidity to watch a baseball game. How do you plan to make more money in a 24,000 seat stadium when you have a 43,000 seat stadium now? I'll
by John C. Mar 18, 2008 10:37 AM
Jeeez, that was harsh!
by Smilin bob Mar 18, 2008 10:37 AM
Vote no, tell all your friends to do same.
by History Mar 18, 2008 10:37 AM
With the history of the city being gods's waiting room.This proposal is more than just a new Rays waterfront stadium,more important to me is the Trop redevelopment & revitalization of midtown which could tie in w/downtown nicely injecting ci
by John Mar 18, 2008 10:36 AM
Howard, You're great -- telling the brutal truth with humor.
by tim Mar 18, 2008 10:36 AM
$450+ million in public money to pay for another wart-like concrete hulk for the baseball industry? Incredible. Our happy and successful civic history of spring training hospitality is being tossed aside to appease the latest cadre of lear&
by smilin bob Mar 18, 2008 8:45 AM
Put the adults back in charge. 1 billion dollars, ridiculous.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT