Detours: a country in search of direction
On the eve of the election, a reporter and photographer set out for Washington, via America. We tell stories from seven towns, touching on seven issues from politics and real life.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Game show themes
These themes are probably going to make some of you have flashbacks to wasted mornings or afternoons spent sprawled in front of the TV.
By
Aaron Sharockman, Times Staff Writer
In print: Friday, May 16, 2008
Tampa Bay Rays senior vice president Michael Kalt, left, and president Matt Silverman explain the funding components of the stadium plan to the St. Petersburg City Council on Thursday.
ST. PETERSBURG — Parking revenues and the extension of city and county taxes would play vital roles in a proposed $450-million waterfront ballpark, the Tampa Bay Rays said Thursday.
Team officials say their financial plan, laid out to City Council members during an afternoon meeting, would rely more on private resources than public.
Mayor Rick Baker called the plan "a good start.''
It includes:
• $150-million up front from the team.
• $100-million from extending a 1 percent tax on Pinellas County hotel stays for an additional 25 to 30 years. That tax is now paying for Tropicana Field.
• $75-million from extending the city's contribution to Tropicana Field for another 25 to 30 years.
• $70-million from the developer buying Tropicana Field.
• And $55-million in guaranteed parking revenue associated with the 34,000-seat ballpark.
As part of any agreement, the Rays said they would pay cost overruns if they oversee construction of the stadium.
The Rays also said the public's contribution — $175-million — would be dwarfed by more than $303-million in new taxes generated by redeveloping Tropicana Field.
"There's new revenue to the local tax base on Day One," said Rays president Matt Silverman. "The reason to do this plan is not about baseball. It's really about the opportunity to generate hundreds of millions of dollars in new tax revenues on Tropicana Field because it can be redeveloped."
Filling in the gap
The Rays have been clear since November that a new ballpark would cost $450-million and that the team would contribute $150-million.
On Thursday, team officials presented a way to fill in that $300-million gap.
Primarily, Rays officials say they are asking the city and county to extend their payments at Tropicana Field for an additional 25 to 30 years to build a new ballpark at Al Lang.
Here's how it would work, the Rays say:
First, developers bidding to buy Tropicana Field must guarantee to pay off the debt remaining at the stadium, which by next year will be about $70-million.
Next, the city and county must agree to shift the money — about $11-million annually — that local governments are paying on the dome to help build the new ballpark.
And last, the governments must agree to extend those payments, which would have expired in 2016, an additional 25 to 30 years.
The annual contribution by the city and county would begin to rise in 2017, Rays officials also say. By 2025, the city and county would be contributing $14.5-million a year to cover new debt on the new ballpark.
But in that same year, 2025, Rays officials project, local governments would receive $22.5-million in new tax revenues.
In today's dollars, the Rays say the Tropicana redevelopment would generate $73-million in new school revenues and more than $200-million in new property and sales tax revenues. The city has not conducted its own analysis.
The city contribution would come from part of its share of excise tax revenues, Rays officials say. The county would be asked to contribute 1 percent of a hotel bed tax.
A coalition of elected officials from Pinellas beaches this month voiced opposition to the funding plan, saying the money should be used to aid beach tourism.
New wrinkles
The hardest part of the Rays' financing plan to comprehend is the final $55-million, which would come from parking revenues.
Council member Jeff Danner suggested a city work session on that piece alone.
Although the Rays collect parking revenues now at Tropicana Field, they would have almost no parking at a downtown ballpark.
Instead, the Rays propose pre-purchasing as many as 2,500 city spaces downtown that the team says are not currently used on game nights. The advance money would cover up to $35-million of construction costs.
For the final $20-million, the team says it has a number of options, including a possible $1 parking surcharge for game-day crowds.
"We have several ways," Silverman said. "What we need to do is begin a discussion with the city to see how things might play out."
That discussion now will begin in earnest. Rays officials said they also plan to meet with county commissioners, perhaps as early as Tuesday.
Because local taxes are involved, the Rays' proposal must be approved by the St. Petersburg City Council and the Pinellas County Commission.
The plan also must pass a November referendum in St. Petersburg because the Rays want to build a new stadium on the city's waterfront.
City Council members on June 5 are expected to make the first of three votes required to schedule that referendum.
A public hearing on the project also is scheduled Thursday at City Hall.
Aaron Sharockman can be reached at asharockman@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2273.
Where does the proposed $450-million come from?
$150-million: From the Tampa Bay Rays.
$70-million: Developers who buy Tropicana Field.
$55-million: Parking revenue from new stadium.
$100-million: Extension of 1 percent tax on Pinellas County hotel stays for another 25 to 30 years.
$75-million: Extension of St. Petersburg's contribution to Tropicana Field for another 25 to 30 years.
[Last modified: May 19, 2008 01:40 PM]
Comments on this article
by Jason
May 19, 2008 1:40 PM
If it isn't broke then don't fix it. http://www.stpetepoww.com/
by Phil
May 19, 2008 10:46 AM
No movement is backwards movement. Establishing a stadium on the water will do 2 things for our city. 1. Raise tax dollars to pay teachers more officers, better roads etc. 2. Bring more money into the area. Its called progress.
by Zach
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
Yes, baseball is all American. However, it is a pasttime. Putting so much time, money & energy into sports and entertainment is what makes Americans seem to shallow, greedy , materialistic and money hungry. Let's re-evaluate our priorities.
by Mimi
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
Response to Cindy's comment: You want to waste a billion dollars so your three kids can be entertained? These are YOUR kids, YOU should entertain them. A billion dollar stadium is an expensive babysitter that I'm not willing to pay for.
by Marianne
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
The greed of the Ray owners sickens me. Let's stop putting so much money into sports! Take a look out of your Hummer windows and notice the need of everyday citizens. Take your money and help the schools, teachers, firefighters, etc.
by Jeff
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
Um, lets see. The money comes from taxes. We weren't going to be paying those taxes after 2016 but now we are. So that's NEW. And its tax money. So NEW TAX MONEY or in other words NEW TAXES.
by Erin
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
OH just wonderful ya know. Takes can now cost more. I'm only 13 and I know what a huge total disaster this is going to b. THX ALOT Mr. Mayor ...
by Walden
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
Uh.... they already did build it, and not enough came. What else you got?
by theresa
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
A new stadium is a bad idea! Tax dollars have already been ill spent on the existing Trop. A much better service to the community would be to spend tax dollars on elder services, uninsured free clinic health issues,and the PROTECTION of wetlands.
by Mike
May 18, 2008 11:56 AM
Renovate the Trop with the money. If you want to see the water build an observation tower at the stadium. It would be an additonal tourist attraction.
All of the facts, claims, math, tax sources, etc., are tossed around like absolute truth. History proves that the truth will only come out when the project is underway. Facts, claims, math and tax sources will all change and citizens will pay the bil
by Willy
May 18, 2008 11:55 AM
Bill, with all due respect your prediction will never bear fruit. The new stadium won't happen. It's just a ploy to allow the Rays to go elsewhere. Why would they want to stay where only a few thousand fans come to see them? Wake up, Bill!!!
by tim
May 18, 2008 11:55 AM
No tourists in the summer, Josh. That's why we've had spring training at Al Lang. Spring = tourists. Get it? Rays in 1st place in summer and still only 15,000 attendance? With air conditioning to boot!
by Troy
May 18, 2008 11:55 AM
Hey Sue, since you dont want to live in a major league city, then leave. Unfortunately for you, you DO live in a major league city. St. Pete has ALWAYS wanted baseball here -- Spring Training haven since the 30's, San Fransico Giants back in 1990?!
by Cindy
May 17, 2008 3:39 PM
Build the Ballpark. We need positive things for our kids to do! My three kids always go to the games. Why on earth is everyone so negative. If they build it they will come. Baseball is America, Build the new stadium!!!
by Bill
May 16, 2008 5:54 PM
John,
Thanks for looking stupid. Lets go over this again the Marlins play in an ugly football stadium with no roof. The Rays will play in beautiful ballpark on the water with a roof. 95% of games will be played between 7-10pm when its not 90 degrees
by John
May 16, 2008 5:25 PM
An outdoor stadium will sell out every 90 degreee day. Just ask the Marlins.
by David
May 16, 2008 5:16 PM
They still haven't answered why? Not one new fan will be converted, not one cent will be new income, The record will be whatever it is. Keeping what we have doesn't cost a penny. Suceed where your at before asking to be rewarded. Only the owners win.
by John
May 16, 2008 5:12 PM
I was hoping for their sake that they would have come up with a reasonable plan with some of their own money rather than rehashing the same old numbers again. Baker has really gotten stuck with another tar baby! Wonder how he's going to weasel out?
by Jesse
May 16, 2008 2:31 PM
Move the team to Tampa? Great idea... if they could afford to pay all the penalties to St. Pete for leaving early. They are stuck in St. Pete and St. Pete is stuck with them. Worst attendance in the league. Real nice.
by Raoul
May 16, 2008 2:28 PM
Why dun't youse guys change the city charter AGAIN to allow only the city counsel to decide capital expenditures like youse did for the first stadium, then no citizen vote is needed. Come on guys show some inventivness.
by Dave
May 16, 2008 2:28 PM
Are these parking and ticket revenue numbers based on a full house, or what they are used to... a SMALL fraction of seats and parking spaces being used? It just doesn't smell right.....
by Sean
May 16, 2008 2:26 PM
In regards to parking. Yes the stadium owners included private lots in the survey because if you own a private lot you will let people park there. At 10$ a car you would be stupid not to make more money 81 guaranteed days a year, you are not to smart
by Sue
May 16, 2008 1:59 PM
I don't know about the others J, but I personally will be jumping for joy and cheering if that albatross of a team leaves. Never wanted them, never will want them. And I never wanted to live in a major league city and wish all who did would move.
by Jon
May 16, 2008 1:59 PM
Since St. Pete is going to end up paying for this huge waste of taxpayer's money, why is the team named the St. Petersburg Ray's?
I personally don't want to give corporate welfare to a team when I don't even like baseball and won't attend the games.
by Carol
May 16, 2008 1:41 PM
Seems some of you can't add. The Rays are paying $150 million. Developer who buys trop is paying $70 million lien. Whatever money the city gets for the Trop will probably just pay the debt back. We are left to pay the rest. And pay and pay....
by MW
May 16, 2008 1:38 PM
I keep seeing people say that it's just "replacing one stadium with another". Yes there is a small ball field on the downtown site now. That is dramatically different than a 34,000 seat STADIUM that won't even fit in the footprint of available land!
by J
May 16, 2008 1:36 PM
The deal looks good. If it's not built, they will go, then what will all of you that don't currently go to the Trop say?
by Mitch
May 16, 2008 1:36 PM
Isn't this the same city that shows such contempt for their own public service they won't even sign contracts with their police and firemen? But wealthy baseball players & owners get whatever they want? Bring on the referendum--- vote no.
by Bill
May 16, 2008 1:36 PM
OK, I read the article, but tell me again why we need a new stadium, maybe I'm dense.
by Joe
May 16, 2008 1:35 PM
If the citizens of this city vote no, than St. Pete isn't going to shoot themselves in the foot. They will be unloading the entire clip.
by rayray
May 16, 2008 1:32 PM
"Take me out to a Rays game,take me out to the NEW bayfront park,buy me some peanuts & crackerjacks,I don't care if I ever get back.It's root root root for the Rays,if they don't build it it's a shame.It's not 2nd,3rd,but Nov 4 & we're in @new park"
by Stadium Opponent
May 16, 2008 1:30 PM
Not on my waterfront. Not on my property taxes. They want a new waterfront stadium - let them move to Disney and build on Lake Buena Vista. hasta la vista baby
by Steve
May 16, 2008 1:29 PM
Go ahead Rays make your pitch; Baker sign on, Danner talk it up.
If this goes to a referendum the citizens will smash it down. Go ahead I want to see your faces when the vote comes in overwhelming against you trying to screw up our waterfront.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.