Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Parking revenue is key to Rays' ballpark plan

By Aaron Sharockman, Times Staff Writer
In print: Thursday, May 22, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT
Related Links

ST. PETERSBURG — The Tampa Bay Rays' plan for a $450-million waterfront ballpark hinges on $55-million in new parking revenue generated by a 34,000-seat downtown stadium.

But the success of the plan may rely on the city's willingness to lease as many as 2,500 city parking spaces and fans' willingness to fork over an extra $1 for parking.

Here is how the Rays say it could work:

The city of St. Petersburg owns as many as 4,000 parking spaces downtown that the city does not currently use most nights, the Rays say.

The team wants to purchase 2,000 to 2,500 spaces from the city for 81 games a year. The team would pay that money up front and then sell those spaces to season ticket holders.

In return, the city would take that revenue and pour it into construction of the new ballpark. The Rays say that scenario can generate $35-million for the new ballpark.

But it's not that simple, the city says.

Currently, parking revenue pays for the parking operations downtown. If money is left over — and the city says that hasn't been the case for five years — it could help pay off some of the city's debt.

Under the Rays' proposal, that money would have to be redirected to pay for the new stadium, city finance director Jeff Spies said. Spies said the Rays' request is possible.

Also, not all of the spaces the Rays may be seeking are available, according to the city. The South Core garage, the garage closest to Al Lang Field, could not be part of any agreement before 2012 because of a previous funding agreement, the city says.

Rays senior vice president Michael Kalt said there are enough spaces in the city's inventory that some will not need to be included. "If you can't use 'X' garage for games, it's not a deal breaker," Kalt said.

While purchasing parking spaces in advance covers $35-million, the team and the city must still identify an additional $20-million to complete the construction of the ballpark.

The Rays say they have several possibilities but are focusing so far on one: a $1 surcharge for fans parking at a baseball game.

Kalt said the city would have to set clear limits on who would pay. He suggested that the city create a zone around the stadium, then apply the surcharge only at certain times before and during a game, and apply it to parking lot operators charging, say, $10 or more.

That way, Kalt said, people parking at BayWalk for a movie or the Pier to have dinner would not be charged.

What's not clear, however, is whether patrons would have to pay $1 more to park or whether operators would simply shave $1 off their profit.

Also unclear is how parking operators would be able to charge different prices based on the reason people are using their garage or parking lot.

The city sent a series of questions to the Rays on Tuesday regarding the team's financing plan, including the parking revenue. The Rays say they will have more answers as soon as today, when the City Council is expected to take up the proposal at an afternoon workshop.

"For us, we think it's a fair way of approaching it," Kalt said of asking baseball patrons to share in the burden. "But if it's politically infeasible, we'll find another way."


Today

1:30 p.m., City Hall

City Council workshop on Rays' proposal

6 p.m., City Hall

Public hearing on Rays' proposal

for jump, if possible

The Rays' $450-million financing plan

• $150-million from the team.

• $100-million from Pinellas County, by extending a 1 percent tax on Pinellas County hotel stays.

• $75-million from the city, by extending the city's contribution now made to Tropicana Field.

• $70-million from the developer purchasing Tropicana Field.

• $55-million from parking revenues generated by the ballpark.

Source: Tampa Bay Rays





>>if you go

Events today

1:30 p.m., City Hall: City Council workshop on Rays' proposal

6 p.m., City Hall: Public hearing on Rays' proposal

>>fast facts

Financing plan

The Rays' $450-million financing plan:

• $150-million from the team.

• $100-million from Pinellas County, by extending a 1 percent tax on Pinellas County hotel stays.

• $75-million from the city, by extending the city's contribution now made to Tropicana Field.

• $70-million from the developer purchasing Tropicana Field.

• $55-million from parking revenue generated by the ballpark.

Source: Tampa Bay Rays


[Last modified: May 23, 2008 03:05 PM]



Comments on this article
by Mandy May 23, 2008 3:05 PM
No NEW Waterfront Stadium! No Vote without all the facts and a clear, unambiguous question! If the Rays want to leave, let 'em. Perhaps they can take all the Johnny-come-lately a-holes who are trying to destroy our city with them.
by Marco May 23, 2008 3:02 PM
They offer free parking now right? Go ahead leave, pay your $89 million lease off, then knock it down, sell the land and we take all the profit for projects we need to live. How about curbside recycling? Tampa does it with no more cost, cant we??
by Marco May 23, 2008 3:01 PM
Hey Tampa, take them, you seem to be good at paying for stadiums. Maybe the Chamber of Commerce should get on the ball and help us not got shot, stabbed or robbed at Bay Walk and then people will come downtown. We all know its not safe.
by Jim May 23, 2008 10:36 AM
I have an idea, why doesn't the city of St. Petersburg, Pinellas County, heck even the state of Florida turn ALL of their revenue over to these theives. Maybe then they'll field a viable team and quit feigning poverty.
by Seymor May 22, 2008 5:08 PM
It's not about baseball, it's about city renovation, jobs, expanding tax base, utilizing the waterfront in a unique way, becoming a great world class "destination" city. Build a multi use stadium 60-100,000 seats. Monorail people movers, etc.
by Tony May 22, 2008 5:08 PM
We must build it, Steve Raymund, co-chairman of the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce's baseball task force, said that if St. Petersburg won't build the Rays a new stadium, some other city will. We must build it.
by Merle H. May 22, 2008 5:07 PM
Join me in welcoming the new Rays stadium and the resultant renovation of the city. Soon, We'll all be drinkin' free Bubble-Up, Eatin' that rainbow stew. Hallelujah
by Bocephus May 22, 2008 5:05 PM
Where is Rick Dodge when we need him?
by Otis May 22, 2008 5:04 PM
Won't work. Will cost taxpayers. Will have to raise taxes to maintain status quo. And after it's all done, the current city leadership will go on to other things, and we will be stuck.
by Ray May 22, 2008 3:00 PM
I dont think there will be a parking issue that would require people going to the games....when are they moving to Vegas
by Demetrios May 22, 2008 2:57 PM
Bottom line, it will go to a vote and it will pass. The negative Nancy's will have their opportunity just like they did when they threatened to vote out all the councilmembers who voted for the Trop 22 yrs ago. It didn't happen then and won't now!
by Dave May 22, 2008 1:43 PM
I can't believe people are falling for this crock. Tax payers are going to get the shaft again, for some billionaire owner and millionaire cry baby players.
by Demetrios May 22, 2008 1:42 PM
To PS: When you figure out how you can make money off of "unused spaces" then you've got something! No stadium equals "unused spaces" equals no money for the city.
by Demetrios May 22, 2008 1:41 PM
To Paul: You also have a stadium that's been there for over 70 years. So what's the problem putting a new one in and what are you going to do with what is there now? Maintain it? Tear it down? That won't cost aything. There are plenty of parks.
by Jack May 22, 2008 1:40 PM
I love taking the kids to games in St. Pete and would love even more to come to a new ballpark. However, if there are too many cheap elderly complainers in St. Pete move it to Dale Mabry or near the fairgrounds.
by PS May 22, 2008 1:39 PM
Brent, That was the argument to initially build the Trop. Now the Rays are asking for the parking revenue too! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice....
by billy May 22, 2008 1:38 PM
why must this thing be shoved down our throats? this ballpark will destroy downtown. how has the current tropicana field helped its immediate area? not very much...look at how desolate the area is between mlk and 16th, even with all that parking.
by Mary May 22, 2008 1:37 PM
Is everyone also forgetting the cost to clean up the environmental issues under the Trop? The clean up could run into millions of dollars and from what I understand, the city will be responsible for it. Just let the Rays pay for the entire project.
by Greg May 22, 2008 1:36 PM
Okay...we have an indoor stadium with AC, and plenty of adequate on-siteparking, yet we only get on average 17,000 in attendance (per Baseball Almanac) a game--yet the number say they need to sellout 80% of time for financing to work--it won't happen
by ted May 22, 2008 1:33 PM
Paul-there is already a stadium on the waterfront isn't there? I don't get what the people of St. Pete have against redevelopment. Old is good sometimes, but new brings in the money.
by Dennis May 22, 2008 1:31 PM
The dumb Hillsborough people wanting to move the team should stay out of this, you don't matter and if you wanted to matter, you had your chance 15 years ago and you CHOSE the Yankees. Baseball and football in 1 loc would have worked.
by Dennis May 22, 2008 1:30 PM
Hillsborough hippocrites, how much money did you DEMAND the Glazers pay for Ray Jay? Stu and friends are offering to put 150 of their own in, 33% is good, and if some of you are crying because of a 20 mill shortfall, pennies in the grand scheme
by Paul May 22, 2008 11:28 AM
People do come from all over to see St Pete. They come to see the waterfront and the arts and the museums. Downtown is successful, now, today! No stadium on our waterfront. We've had parks on the waterfront for 100 years! That's what makes us great!
by Tim May 22, 2008 11:28 AM
Build it and they will come,they have... where are the poeple, the team is in 1st and attendance is near last.
by Brent May 22, 2008 11:21 AM
Every nay sayer needs to look at the whole picture and imagine the Revenue to the city that will come from having a state of the art MLB Ballpark... "If you build it they will come". People will come from all over to see the games. Go St Pete!!!
by Russ May 22, 2008 11:17 AM
to REALITY: Your math is right, just multiply that times 20 years. Do you think they only meant charge $1 for 1 year??
by PS May 22, 2008 11:16 AM
This makes no sense! Why wouldn't the city just keep the "unused spaces" and earn the additional parking revenue? More smoke and mirrors!
by john May 22, 2008 10:43 AM
there is a difference between being negative and realistic ..all that glitters is not gold .
by Reality May 22, 2008 10:43 AM
12,000@$1 surcharge=$12,000*81 games=$972,000??? How are we getting to $20 million? how about the Rays just pay for the stadium, and they can do whatever they want! Sternberg, you have money, try and spend some. If it was good, you would.
by Martin May 22, 2008 10:42 AM
Revitalization of downtown? It's already happened...the new stadium will just ruin it. Already limited parking (on some nights) will disappear and local businesses that need them will suffer. It's all about spending, debt and greed.
by Stuart May 22, 2008 10:42 AM
If they want to build, they should come up with the money themselves, like everyone else. Go to the banks, not the bloody tax payers!
by David May 22, 2008 10:42 AM
KNOWING that the Parking "solution" still created a 20M shortfall, and they havent come up with any viable solutions to cover that, I'de say the Rays think they are dealing with a bunch of ignorant hicks. I'de like to see how tonight turns out.
by max May 22, 2008 9:48 AM
This is a very good plan. Let's not be shortsighted folks. Most of you posters on here have made a living by being negative. Must be a sad existence. GO RAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Peter May 22, 2008 9:20 AM
Consider a purpose-built stadium in Gateway area, Toytown Dump area or at Legends Field in Tampa. Downtown on the Bay ? No Way. I oppose ANY taxes or public dollars supporting professional sports franchises.
by Bob May 22, 2008 9:18 AM
how much money can 12000 fans a game generate?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT