The girl in the window Three years ago detectives and a social worker arrived at a dilapidated house in Plant City and made a heartbreaking discovery: A tiny girl living in a dark closet.
Criss Angel escapes as Spyglass crumbles
Thousands on Clearwater Beach watch and wonder as Criss Angel escapes the Spyglass Resort just before the building is demolished in a series of explosions.
Best Super Bowl moment? To commemorate the Super Bowl's return to Tampa Bay next February, we chose 25 nominees for the most memorable play in the championship game's history.
Progress Energy CEO Jeff Lyash, St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Baker, Rays senior vice president Michael Kalt and Rays president Matt Silverman discuss the Rays’ search for a new stadium Wednesday. Baker says the Rays need a new venue.
The Tampa Bay Rays suspended their all-out push for a waterfront stadium Wednesday as community leaders vowed to help the team find the best site for a new ballpark and money to build it. The Rays acknowledged that complex negotiations over stadium construction, redevelopment of Tropicana Field, parking and other issues would be difficult to resolve in time for a November referendum. "The tight timetable and looming November referendum was a constant shadow, a cloud that was looming over the process," said Rays president Matt Silverman. "There wasn't broad support for the time period we brought forward."
The downtown waterfront location will still be considered along with other sites. No time frame for a new stadium or a possible referendum was set.
Team officials said they will let a group of community, city and county leaders lead the search for a new stadium. Progress Energy CEO Jeff Lyash will head the group.
On the table will be the location, funding and design of a new ballpark, said Mayor Rick Baker.
Missing from Wednesday's discussions: keeping Tropicana Field as the Rays' long-term home. The mayor said he is convinced the team needs a new stadium.
In recent months, opponents of the waterfront location suggested alternatives such as the county's old Toytown landfill, Derby Lane's property and a Tropicana Field glitzed up with shops, restaurants and lofts. All those sites fall within St. Petersburg city limits.
But the Rays, Baker and others who broke the news Wednesday studiously avoided speculating about where a new stadium might go.
Lyash refused to rule out any location.
"I'd be very reluctant to constrain that or enforce limits right now,'' he said, though he later noted that the Rays are a "St. Petersburg-based team and a Pinellas County team and there's a weight that comes with that.''
Baker, who said he prefers the Trop site or some other downtown location, was open to the Gateway area, but no farther. "I would not support a stadium outside St. Petersburg.''
Rays vice president Michael Kalt indicated the team is open to a midcounty site. "A tradeoff might come between an iconic location on the waterfront and being 15 minutes closer to the center of the region,'' he said.
Deal hatched Sunday
The Rays' decision to postpone the stadium vote solidified during a Sunday meeting at Tropicana Field between Baker and Rays principal owner Stuart Sternberg.
Sternberg, in town for the first time in more than a month, told Baker that team officials would ask to delay a referendum.
The two then talked about the future, and the need to find common ground.
"They informed me where they wanted to go," Baker said.
The two then floated the idea of a broad community coalition to lead a search for alternatives.
On Monday, Baker asked Lyash to lead the group while Silverman informed Pinellas County Commissioner Ken Welch.
"I told him it was a great idea," Welch said Wednesday. "This thing was not going in a direction that was going to be successful for the Rays."
On Tuesday, Welch and others told the St. Petersburg Times about the shift without offering details. On Wednesday, the team and city made it official at an afternoon news conference.
Lyash has not yet named members to his group but said he expected them to come from myriad backgrounds around the Tampa Bay area. He said he hopes to make considerable progress in a year to 18 months.
The group will have a broad scope to examine potential sites but will also look at ways to improve the relationship between the Rays and the community. Its role will be advisory.
"The Rays have stepped up their game," Lyash said. "We have to step up our game."
Among other things, Silverman said to be competitive the Rays need local corporations to buy a lot more season tickets.
Coming together
Wednesday's announcement marked the first time community leaders presented such a unified front since the Rays announced their plans in November.
For the first time, Baker said that the team needed a new stadium to remain viable in the long run.
He was flanked by city officials, members of the St. Petersburg Chamber of Commerce, Rays officials and Barbara Heck, the president of St. Petersburg's Council of Neighborhood Associations.
The Rays characterized it as a watershed moment.
"We're excited about passing the torch to the community," Silverman said. "We're open to all possibilities."
City and county leaders admitted the change of course was overdue.
County leaders said the Rays probably could not get support from the county's Tourism Development Council for extending a bed tax that was critical to their financing plan.
Neither, admitted the city, was it likely that St. Petersburg voters would support the team's waterfront ballpark proposal in a November referendum.
A June St. Petersburg Times/Bay News 9 poll found 68 percent of St. Petersburg residents opposed the Rays' waterfront plan.
"Now the work starts, the community can roll up its selves and find a location for a new stadium complex that will benefit all residents of Pinellas County," said former City Council member Bill Foster.
New questions raised
Expanding the stadium discussion past the waterfront creates new questions for city and team officials.
While the waterfront proposal required a referendum, any site away from the waterfront site would not.
Baker said he had not decided whether he would seek a referendum for any new ballpark. That decision will likely be left to the city's next mayor and City Council. Baker's term expires in January 2010. Scuttling the November referendum means the November 2009 city elections could be dominated by the question of a new ballpark.
Also to be considered is the short-term future of Al Lang Field, the former spring training home of the Rays. Opponents of the Rays' stadium plan want the land turned into a park, which would eliminate the site for the Rays.
For now Baker said he envisioned keeping the site as it is, with the hope of attracting college or amateur baseball tournaments.
Times staff writers Marc Topkin, Cristina Silva and Will Van Sant contributed to this report.
What the delay means
For the Rays: No longer will lead the stadium talks.
For the downtown St. Pete waterfront: Still a possible stadium site, but not the only option.
For Al Lang Field: Mayor Rick Baker favors leaving it as is for now.
For redevelopment of the Tropicana Field site: Delayed.
[Last modified: Jul 01, 2008 08:43 PM]
Comments on this article
by Glenn
Jul 1, 2008 8:43 PM
I find it disturbing that our elected officials still want the general public to foot the bill for the stadium. They did not "get it" that a large segment of opposition does not want public money spent on a private business.
by Lucas
Jul 1, 2008 1:51 PM
What would the waterfront stadium do to the Indycar race? I would rather lose the Rays than the Indycar race.
by Philip
Jul 1, 2008 9:31 AM
The newer ballpark in San Francisco has shown us the light ! Waterfront stadia generate excitement ! The Retractable Dome will work, just as it has in Seattle and in Arizona.
by Chip
Jun 28, 2008 8:33 PM
Build a stadium closer to Tampa. The Rays appear to be one of the best teams in baseball. They may win 50 games before the All Star break. Yet, the fans are not filling the stands. Build it in or close to Hillsborough, and the people will come.
by Ari
Jun 27, 2008 7:02 PM
To all of you negative nellys in Tampa...The people of St Pete love the Rays. We are just trying to make sure we don't get screwed with this new stadium the way you let yourselves get thrown around by the Bucs! How easy you forget that horrible deal!
by mooky
Jun 27, 2008 5:13 PM
Go Rays Go! And take mayor baker and the city council with you!...Good riddance!
by Paul
Jun 27, 2008 5:13 PM
...who cares...improve the schools
by ken
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
just be warned the leader of this new community group heads a power company based in North Carolina. And when I lived in Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman(former mob lawyer)vows to get them. To be honest this area does not deserve Major League Baseball
by Barbara
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
There was no reason to make life hell for the people who live and work downtown. The traffic would have been a nightmare. Build a new stadium where the trop is! Problem solved.
by Sween
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
A not so well orchestrated PR event to try to save face spun by the Rays, Baker, Progress Energy, St. Pete Times and irrelevant Chamber of Commerce. Not buying the BS they are still selling.
by Janice
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
The Rays are having an outstanding season, even generating news and respect up here in New England. What's the matter with people down there that they can't get excited about this team and give them the support they deserve.
by Jason
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
Boooo!!
by Ed
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
Boston sports show on WBZ(AM redio) pm today referred to the great new rivalry between the Rays & Red Sox: wake up St.Pete!! History is being written!
by Wes
Jun 27, 2008 9:41 AM
Perfect, move the Rays to downtown Tampa or somewhere near the fairgrounds. Will attract more fans and finally we don't have to drive to Pinellas anymore.
by come on
Jun 26, 2008 7:31 PM
Toytown just sounds like a stupid name for a development. Might as well put the letter in turquoise colors and have pink flamingos as the mascot. We can never get respect with Toytown...
by chd
Jun 26, 2008 6:40 PM
Yet another lesson in the short-sighted-ness of presenting a solution rather than identifying and analyzing the problem (if any)and engaging in a process whereby all interested parties arrive together at the solution. Think process!
by Steve
Jun 26, 2008 5:12 PM
Wow! Common sense prevailed? Here in St. Pete? Astonishing!
by Dave
Jun 26, 2008 5:07 PM
The high ground for the upcoming "Battle of the 2009 Mayorial-Council Election" has already been gained by the "anti-waterfront" stadium advocates! The P.R. damage done by the Rays & City on this ill-conceived & forced fiasco may be insurmountable!
by colt
Jun 26, 2008 5:04 PM
This is on the New Owners. They were not ready and they PULLED THE VOTE.. Dont blame St.Pete.
Amazing that business men like this got caught with their pants down
by Ron
Jun 26, 2008 5:04 PM
I hope the effort continues to have the vote. Let's get this on record and get it killed. Otherwise the snakes are still waiting in the grass at City Hall to develop the waterfront.
by Dennis
Jun 26, 2008 5:04 PM
This is somewhat sad, the very few downtown win out, kind of like albert whitted. If they can solve parking, Al Lang, now a revenueless area, is still the best choice (of course eveyone in Tampa will disagree), move the Bucs to Toytown!
by Heidi
Jun 26, 2008 5:03 PM
With today's economy this is not the time for a new, grandiose stadium along our beautiful waterfront. The team should go green and consider alternatives at its present sight. What a huge waste to completely abandon a 20 yr old expensive stadium!?
by richie rich
Jun 26, 2008 5:03 PM
Is this a good time to build a half a billion dolar stadium? What's wrong with the old one?
by DL
Jun 26, 2008 5:02 PM
Wow, what a beautiful picture. See you later MLB baseball in the Bay. Here we come Charlotte, here we come.
by christina
Jun 26, 2008 5:02 PM
you can't have an outside stadium in this weather and summer rain season.look at miami,the games are empty.if everone works together for awhile maybe the plan could be worked out to please a majority.im happy this one was not forced on us tax payers'
by johnny
Jun 26, 2008 5:01 PM
Geez, you think the world can stand no new stadium? Great news
by John
Jun 26, 2008 4:36 PM
I think it is a good idea to mull over other alternatives within the county that might benefit the Rays and Pinellas county as well. However Jeff Lyash with his 66% raise should be running Progress Energy and leave this issue to professionals.
by MIKE
Jun 26, 2008 4:33 PM
Tim, if this action has caused St. Petersburg to lose major league baseball, then so be it. Having previously mortgaged the futures of ourselves and our children, many were not willing to mortgage our grandchildren.
by dm
Jun 26, 2008 4:27 PM
Anyone who thinks we've lost MLB must be new in town. StPete and MLB have had 83 years of history. Your assuming they will find another city in a better place with enough ignorant people to finance a group of millionares with tax funds for 30 years.
by joe
Jun 26, 2008 4:27 PM
Wnt by Al Lang today not one person there except bums...HAHA! St. Pete is the scum of the earth so I hope they move somewhere else in Pinellas so I don't ever have to see that dump of a city again!!!
by MPN
Jun 26, 2008 4:26 PM
MLB moves out of town we follow.
by Matt
Jun 26, 2008 4:26 PM
Toytown is off the same I-275 as the Trop, only the developer and pols benefit from that location. MLB has significant history on the Al Lang site and is the ONLY reasonable location for anyone who understands St. Pete's significant baseball history.
by Don
Jun 26, 2008 4:25 PM
I am disappointed that we did not get to vote the waterfront site down. Hopefully, the study group will realize that many of the citizens of St. Petersburg oppose the waterfront location even if they solve the financial, design, & parking issues.
by paul
Jun 26, 2008 4:25 PM
Goodbye Pie-nell-us..hello Raleigh Rays!
by tim
Jun 26, 2008 4:25 PM
When you know you'll lose, change the rules. This gives these slime-balls time to pay off the politicians. Vote now, and put this lunacy to rest.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.