Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Everyone wants a voice on stadium plans

By Cristina Silva, Times Staff Writer
In print: Friday, July 4, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

ST. PETERSBURG — It sounded simple enough.

Gather a group of local leaders to figure out how to build a baseball stadium.

But a week after Mayor Rick Baker and Tampa Bay Rays officials tapped Progress Energy chief executive Jeff Lyash to head the effort, it's clear that his task will be anything but easy.

City, county, business and neighborhood leaders already are battling for a voice on the committee, ensuring politics will dominate the selection process. Everyone seems to have an opinion on how the group should be formed. And even the size is subject to debate — big enough to be diverse but small enough to be effective.

"You have a have a lot of different interests there that have to be reconciled," said Will Michaels, chairman of the Council of Neighborhood Association's baseball committee. "He is going to have to be able to broker compromises, and that is no easy thing to do."

Lyash, who is on vacation this week and could not be reached for comment, hasn't said much about what he plans to do, other than forming a group that is as inclusive as possible.

The idea of a stadium task force was born in the wake of the Rays' decision last week to indefinitely withdraw their $450-million downtown stadium proposal.

Team officials say Lyash will have absolute authority over the coalition's inner workings.

"The first order of business will be putting the group together and deciding what the scope of their charge will be," said Michael Kalt, the Rays' senior vice president of development and business affairs. "Obviously you would want to see representatives from all parts of the community represented on the coalition. Jeff is smart enough to know how to make this thing successful."

Community leaders agree Lyash will have to include officials from north and south Pinellas, and maybe Hillsborough County.

But that's about the only thing they agree on.

St. Petersburg leaders say city officials should comprise the majority of the group and that the focus should be on keeping the team in the city. County leaders, however, say the group should include an equal mix of people from throughout the Tampa Bay area.

And debate over whether the coalition should include elected officials, neighborhood leaders, organized groups for and against the stadium or business owners is even more heated.

"You wouldn't want it to be all chamber people or all members of POWW (Preserve Our Wallets and Waterfront) or all people for the stadium. And obviously, none of the council members should be on it," said St. Petersburg City Council member Wengay Newton. "That would be too much of a conflict of interest."

But Pinellas County Commissioner Bob Stewart said the group should include as many different parties as possible, including activists, elected officials and regular sports fans.

"Along the journey you have to build public support," he said. "You do that through involvement, participation and extensive communication."

Opinions also differ over how the members should be selected.

Council member Karl Nurse said people should be able to nominate themselves.

Jim Lawrence, president of the Barrier Islands Government Council, said Lyash should first figure out the qualities he's looking for.

Some groups have already volunteered their services, including the Council of Neighborhood Associations, POWW and the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce.

"The important criteria is that the members have an open mind," said Steve Raymund, co-chairman of the St. Petersburg Area Chamber of Commerce's baseball task force. "This committee had been formed on the premise that we want the Rays to be successful in St. Petersburg for a long time. The other premise is that the Rays will need to find a new home way before their lease runs out. So whomever joins the committee needs to be on board with these two premises."

Cristina Silva can be reached at (727) 893-8846.



[Last modified: Jul 07, 2008 05:41 PM]



Comments on this article
by EQUAL FOOTING Jul 7, 2008 5:41 PM
IF POWW ("WE WILL DO ANYTHING TO DERAIL THIS") GETS ONE PERSON ON THE COMMITTEE, THAN FANS ALSO NEEDS TO GET ONE PERSON. IF POWW GETS TWO, THAN FANS GETS TWO
by since1962 Jul 7, 2008 5:25 PM
No loyalty oath need be administered nor should this be a Rays/political/chamber conference call. CITIZENS groupS questioned Rays AND "official(s)" veracity so they MUST be fully represented if failure is to be avoided.
by Ed Jul 7, 2008 5:07 PM
So when are the St Pete Rays(pop. 275,000) moving to San Antonio (Pop. 1,850,000)?
by Steve Jul 6, 2008 3:23 PM
What group has its own website, webmaster, newletter, sign committee, choice sign locations, dozens of researchers, hundreds of volunteers, three attorneys, and various other professionals, virtually working 24/7 on their "position"? Only one, POWW!!
by Phil Jul 5, 2008 10:57 PM
"members [must] have an open mind," said Steve Raymund. Yet the members must conform "with these two premises." A real leader. Nothing will come of this; What a joke!
by Get Smart Jul 5, 2008 10:57 PM
POWW and CONA have more leadership skills and following than the empty suits of Baker, the chamber and the rest of these blow hards with jobs combined.
by Ben Jul 5, 2008 10:57 PM
With some exceptions, stadium supporter arguments are usually attack stadium opponents intelligence. Whereas opponent arguments are generally reasoned, citing priority, need, cost, and best use of property. There is no good reason for a new stadium.
by Dom Jul 4, 2008 1:23 PM
Would Yankee Stadium average crowds of 52,000 every night if the Lexington Ave IRT didn't run next to it? Would Fenway sell out every night if the MTA'S Green Line didn't run next to it? Etc, etc and etc.
by Dom Jul 4, 2008 12:09 PM
At the north end of the Trop's parking lot, lies the terminus of the CSX rail line coming from Tampa. In this day & age of high gas prices & traffic congestion,it's beyond me why our leaders eliminated the only site that could utilize rail access.
by Tony Jul 4, 2008 12:03 PM
Now you see why the Rays did this? All the squabbling from the business sector. Guess what, if the fans don't like the stadium or the location it wouldn't be the Rays fault. Smart move to the rays management.
by ed Jul 4, 2008 11:56 AM
Open mind to waste money building a new ballpark.
by Lopaka Jul 4, 2008 11:36 AM
"The important criteria is that the members have an open mind..." Most people in St. Petersburg think they have open minds when in fact they are merely vacant.
by tim Jul 4, 2008 11:27 AM
Again, Michael Kalt of the Rays is telling that eunich, Rick Baker how to operate. Now he says North Carolina's Progress Energy should have the final say. The Rays will do anything to keep the taxpayers from voting on this.
by bill Jul 4, 2008 11:09 AM
It seems that the Rays are the ones not open minded cause if the people say they don't want a new stadium and thier tax money spent in that way, then DROP the subject. If the city would really profit then I'm sure there wouldn't be so much opposition
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT