Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

St. Petersburg art gallery owner says he's being railroaded

By Cristina Silva, Times Staff Writer
In print: Tuesday, July 29, 2008


Bill Schramm, owner of 2501 Gallery, was arrested on two charges, including violating an ordinance that prohibits places that serve alcohol from allowing the public display of genitals. He said he plans to fight the charges and sue the city.
Bill Schramm, owner of 2501 Gallery, was arrested on two charges, including violating an ordinance that prohibits places that serve alcohol from allowing the public display of genitals. He said he plans to fight the charges and sue the city.
[WILLIE J. ALLEN JR. | Times]
Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

ST. PETERSBURG — An erotic art gallery owner arrested Friday for hanging a naked man from his ceiling says he is being forced out of business after months of harassment by the city and a few angry neighbors.

"It's been the most horrific experience of my life," said William Schramm, owner of 2501 Gallery. "I'm getting railroaded out of this town. But I'm not leaving without a fight."

Police arrested Schramm and model Joshua Culotta during an art opening Friday night.

Schramm was charged with battery of a law enforcement officer and the unlawful exposure of private parts, a violation of a city ordinance that prohibits places that serve alcohol from allowing the public display of genitals.

The raid was not coincidental, Schramm said.

He has been cited four times for code compliance violations since May, including for leaving a large pile of mulch in front of his property, failure to apply for a certificate of occupancy and parking a trailer on his property.

City officials are targeting him, he said, because he is a gay man running an erotic art gallery that focuses on homoerotic images.

"I'm realizing that this is the most rednecked, backward town," he said. "They want me out of here."

Police Chief Chuck Harmon said the city has no problems with gay-centric businesses.

"To me, it's a clear-cut violation of the ordinance," he said. "We are a very diverse community and respectful of the diversity of the community."

Schramm, who hosted his first erotic art show in August, said he has to close the gallery to focus on the legal battle before him. He plans to fight the charges and sue the city for discrimination and other civil rights violations.

Several artists have begun to auction their erotic images on eBay.com to help cover Schramm's legal fees.

But for Schramm's critics, the shop's demise is a victory.

"Big penises in the yard don't exactly make people feel comfortable," said City Council member Jeff Danner, who represents the Grand Central District and has received some complaints about the gallery.

Police descended on the gallery Friday after a neighbor complained about an oversized penis statue Schramm had displayed outside near the entrance.

A police officer told Schramm it was pornographic and told him to take it inside. Schramm refused.

"I don't feel an 8-foot-tall wooden penis is pornographic," he said. "If it is, then they need to go through St. Petersburg and chisel the genitalia off of every statue in the city."

Soon after, several officers appeared at the gallery, demanding to be let in. Undercover officers were already at the party.

"We got indication there would be some sort of live performance," Harmon said.

Schramm said he tried to show a police officer how to push the door open, but he was tackled to the ground. Schramm, who has a heart condition, said he was pushed so hard the lead in his defibrillator fell out.

Police said Schramm touched the officer's hand and tried to prevent him from entering.

Once inside, police found Culotta naked, sitting in a swing and hanging from the ceiling.

Culotta, who is deaf, did not know what was happening, Schramm said.

"He was crying," Schramm said. "They just laughed at him. It was horrific."

Harmon said Culotta was not ridiculed and an officer fluent in sign language translated for him.

The event, called "men in trees," was intended to provoke dialogue about boundaries, Schramm said.

"I knew it was questionable, I really did," he said. "I told everyone I am going to be arrested tonight."

But Schramm, who has featured nude models at the gallery before, said police had no right to treat him and Culotta as brutally as they did.

"I will stand by my art," he said. "But you can't take away my civil rights."

Cristina Silva can be reached at (727) 893-8846 or csilva@sptimes.com.



[Last modified: Aug 04, 2008 03:29 PM]



Comments on this article
by EWall Aug 4, 2008 3:29 PM
I'm not following the straight logic on this. If it is *gay art* it is automatically perverse? Would we be more respectful people if we dressed up our art (like straight guys do) and made it wear hose and skimpy tops that show cleavage and force it to serve us beer and chicken wings? What about stuffing beer-stale dollar bills down its chest at a strip club?
by Jan Jul 30, 2008 2:46 PM
People get a grip - the genitalia on display at the Dali museum as art are inanimate items - not live "models". He deliberately violated laws to get media attention so he could cry "poor picked on gay guy" - now he's crying cause it worked
by Lisa Jul 30, 2008 2:12 PM
The guy is eccentric but Its the human body folks.those who wanted to see this "art" could go in those who did not dont go..I recently went to see the nw Batman..and saw children.6 yrs old now thats disturbing..violence is ok a penis is not?
by Melissa Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
I agree with the comment that this is why gay men are equated as perverts!
by Ed Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
Who cares about this idiot? Bennigan's is closing after 45 years in business and the really filthy places like Taco Bell and KFC remain open.
by Germaine Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
I totally agree with Tito on this one. The bums lost, Lebowski.
by Clear Cut Discrimination Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
The Dali museum serves alcohol on S'Real Fridays and Dali's art includes a multimedia vagina shot and phallic "bread loaves". It is also the pride of the city! This city will direct resources anywhere but towards the drugs and guns all around.
by Tramor Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
TS, there's a difference between having a liquor license and where beer and wine have been served at galleries. If they don't charge for the drinks, then yes, they can provide the drinks for their guests. You are choosing to be ignorant of the laws!
by Larry Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
Art has often been about pushing the limits, but it seems that St. Pete has no concept that at the turn of the century modern art set new rules. It may be time for the city to wake up and get into a new century.
by t Jul 30, 2008 8:26 AM
if schramm was not gay none us this would have happened. I'm not gay and am real tired of all the homophobia going around. Don't like that kind if art then don't go to see it.
by Zuly Jul 29, 2008 6:54 PM
This has nothing to do with the art, or sexual orientation. It is all about the gallery owner pushing boundaries that he was WELL aware would cause him problems.
by TS Jul 29, 2008 6:21 PM
The double-edged sword here is where tax dollars are being spent. And by the way, I have been to plenty of art galleries where wine and beer have been served. This was an inside job by the City to bag this guy. Let's not forget last year his building's windows were smashed and fag painted on the front door. Which is better?
by Yuk Jul 29, 2008 6:20 PM
If you want to look at those things, just look at your own. I don't get the "art" involved from an organ that is used to urinate? Toilets must be the Mona Lisa. Call Joe Waller, he hasn't had anything to do for a while...
by Mia Jul 29, 2008 5:29 PM
Then get rid of the bare breasted statues, too. Why are they okay to display? Men, were you intimidated?
by Jim Jul 29, 2008 5:25 PM
How could you tell the cops from the statues,... he shoulda told them they were exact replicas of every cop he knew.
by JR Jul 29, 2008 5:20 PM
America is afraid of nudity. Plain and simple. Go overseas and check out Europe. You can walk pretty much anywhere naked and no one really says anything to you. They may check you out, but who wouldn't? I guess st. pete peeps have no private parts.
by Dave Jul 29, 2008 5:19 PM
Dwama queen, nothing more....
by Marty S. Jul 29, 2008 5:17 PM
Yeah, about that headline - does anyone else see the double edgeness to it? and how exactly do you provoke dialogue with a deaf guy that just happens to be swinging nude from the cieling? Small ones too Councilman Danner...small ones too.
by st.pete Jul 29, 2008 4:25 PM
Are the boohooroos going to protest on behalf of this guy?
by Mel Jul 29, 2008 4:23 PM
Scram!
by Edward Jul 29, 2008 4:23 PM
If your art is so important to you, tell me why you can't enjoy it without a drink. This has nothing to do with art, it's just about this dude trying to push the limits. If he didn't want to be noticed, he could've enjoyed his art quietly.
by Patrick Jul 29, 2008 3:17 PM
Well it's good to know that South St. Pete is free of crime.
by Jim Jul 29, 2008 2:41 PM
if that's the owner,.. he oughta take a shower and get a shave,.. he looks like a bum.
by John Jul 29, 2008 2:17 PM
This is why homosexuals get grouped with perverts.
by GG Jul 29, 2008 2:06 PM
He has a right to run a Business, they probably are Targeting him, I would sue too If I were him!
by DL Jul 29, 2008 2:05 PM
There is no double standard. If you violate the law you get arrested. Remember they arrested "the Christians" when their signs were to big. But of course that was ok because they were on your side that day. Double Standard Indeed!!
by VJ Jul 29, 2008 2:04 PM
Ed, I think straight sex is GROSS and needs to be kept away from children. It is an abomination. All in perspective, my friend... Would the naked Venus di Milo be offensive if it were Victor di Milo? Why is it art if it is a female, but a perversion if male? What is this conservative fear of the penis???
by Roger Jul 29, 2008 2:02 PM
Next time I hope he goes for a 10 ft. penis. Maybe two. Despite the rednecks, Tampa/St. Pete is the next Lauderdale, the next San Francisco, and you can't do anything to stop it.
by Tramor Jul 29, 2008 1:53 PM
VJ, don't try deflecting the main issue, Bill Schram violated two ordinances. You can address the other issues with the Police Department and the owners of the other businesses. Your excuse is part of the problem and not part of the solution!
by Tramor Jul 29, 2008 1:52 PM
The story headline says it all "arrested on two charges, including violating an ordinance that prohibits places that serve alcohol from allowing the public display of genitals.". This man and his patrons should cower in a corner outside city limits!
by JP Jul 29, 2008 1:48 PM
Sorry man, you were totally asking for this issue. gay/straight doesn't make a difference. You knew the rules and obviously understood the consequences. Don't bash St Pete as being a backwards redneck city when we do have a wonderful gay culture here
by Pete Jul 29, 2008 1:46 PM
Nude statues in the city don't have 8 ft penises.Schramm told people he would get arrested.He did.He flagrantly disobeys ordinances, he gets cited.What's your problem, Schramm?St Pete is VERY diverse.You have gone over the edge.We won't have it here.
by Jan Jul 29, 2008 1:45 PM
The officers were responding to a complaint re: something in view from the street not inside the bldg. So now they are supposed to pick and choose what complaints they respond to? He wanted this to be a "news event" or he would have cooperated
by VOR Jul 29, 2008 1:43 PM
The issue here is not sexual oreintation but respect for the laws of public decentcy. the man is violating city ordinances and demanding the right to violate them because of his sexual oreintation. Its not art its defiance and rebellion.
by Jim Jul 29, 2008 1:43 PM
This is absurd. The difference between this gallery and strip clubs is that there is no money being collected by the models. What a waste of time and tax payers money. Let these guys enjoy their art.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT