Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Trees mock the name of New Tampa development

By Bill Coats, Times Staff Writer
In print: Thursday, August 7, 2008


The developers of Live Oak Preserve in New Tampa planned a whole lot of oak trees, but when the county took over, nobody watered the trees, some of which look dead.
The developers of Live Oak Preserve in New Tampa planned a whole lot of oak trees, but when the county took over, nobody watered the trees, some of which look dead.
[BILL COATS | Times]
Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

NEW TAMPA — The housing development is named Live Oak Preserve. But the road beside it features 90 dead oaks.

Among the 200 oaks freshly planted last year along the new extension of Kinnan Street, another 80 look sickly, with some bare branches, some leafy ones. Only 30 of the new oaks seem fully green.

They were planted pursuant to county law, accepted by county commissioners, but watered by nobody through one of the driest autumns in years. Now, the county is planning to pull out the dead ones.

"This is just one of those oddball cases," said John Newton, the county's director of transportation maintenance.

Newton's crews and contractors maintain the landscapes along county roads. They mow grass, trim trees and gather litter. But they leave watering to Mother Nature.

Generally, the system works, even for new plantings that can need up to a year of regular watering. Private property owners take over watering most of the time, said John Schrecengost, a natural resources manager with the county.

The Hillsborough County code requires road builders to plant a shade tree every 50 feet along each side of a new residential or commercial street, Schrecengost said. Trees planted in front of residential lots get maintained by the developer, and later by homeowners who move in. Developers who build collector roads usually want to handle the landscaping themselves to keep their developments looking nice while they sell off the properties there. Later, property owner associations, such as those in Westchase, take over the work under contract with the county because they want nicer landscaping than the county provides, Schrecengost said.

But the developer of Live Oak was different. Transeastern Homes finished the road last year two years behind schedule. Development in the 2-square-mile Live Oak, which had started with a boom, had slowed to a crawl. All the early phases were built at the opposite end from Kinnan Street.

"It's always been considered to be a road that was built because the county required it," said Rick Feather, vice president of operations for Engle Homes, the successor company to Transeastern.

So the trees became the county's responsibility on July 24 last year, the day county commissioners cast a routine vote to accept the extension of Kinnan as a county road.

Before such votes, county staffers inspect the road to ensure it's up to county standards. But the tree people in Schrecengost's office aren't always notified.

"It just kind of got around us until the issue has now recently come up," Schrecengost said.

Bill Coats can be reached at (813) 269-5309 or coats@sptimes.com.



[Last modified: Aug 08, 2008 04:57 PM]



Comments on this article
by Charlie Aug 8, 2008 4:57 PM
Never should have removed the trees that were there.
by Rich Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
This is excessive county waste. They have made developers purchase trees and place them into the ground only to take over control and allow them to die. now we will pay to have them removed. The over development is bad enough. But then to just waste?
by tim Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
Be sure to visit Seminole and the area we all knew as "Bay Pines" The new developers stripped every one of them.
by Rich Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
I would demand they replant those native oaks and take care of them, more trees and less people.
by Mike Aug 8, 2008 9:44 AM
You would think that code enforcement would hold the responsible party accountable(at their cost).We all know that as a homeowner we would get a citatioin if our new tree died and at our cost we would have to replace it.
by Sal Aug 7, 2008 6:26 PM
I would not want to see tax dollars going to waste to replant and maintain.
by R Aug 7, 2008 6:05 PM
There is unrest in the forest, There is trouble with the trees, For the maples want more sunlight And the oaks ignore their pleas.
by Jack Aug 7, 2008 10:54 AM
Fishhawk Ranch killed off the native birds, no American Indians in Calusa Trace, we've encroached on the panther territory in Panther Trace. We ruined the nesting areas for the Eagles: I doubt there are even 9 left.On and on. Hurray! Development!
by Jay Aug 7, 2008 10:24 AM
Who dropped the water can on this one!!!
by Mars Aug 7, 2008 10:23 AM
what a shame that nobody noticed the trees dying, or did anything about it. so now these beautiful trees are dead. I feel bad for the trees!!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT