Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Indian Rocks Beach garbage, sewer fees poised to rise by 60%

By Sheila Mullane Estrada, Times Correspondent
In print: Sunday, August 17, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

INDIAN ROCKS BEACH — Huge increases in sewer and garbage rates appear assured here as the city struggles to return its utility operations to profitability.

Tuesday, the City Commission tentatively approved 60 percent increases in residential solid waste and sewer fees. Similar increases also were approved for commercial customers. A final vote is set for Aug. 28.

"Anybody who is a commissioner does not like to talk about, vote on, or have any part of increases," Mayor R. B. Johnson said. "But we are the ones who have to make this decision. It's us five. This is one of the toughest times I can recall being a commissioner."

The proposed garbage rate increase means that single-family homeowners will pay $21.30 a month instead of the current $13.31 a month.

Similarly, monthly residential sewer fees will jump from $23.72 to $37.95.

A higher, 80 percent increase (to $42.70 monthly) for sewer fees was rejected, largely because the city is considering selling its sewer system to the county.

The unanimous decision came after months of discussion and accusations from some residents that the city's finances were badly mismanaged.

"I am upset by these numbers, as well. There are a lot bigger errors than I even expected," said Commissioner Daniel Torres.

"As a city we are in a very bad position, and I don't want to see us get in a worse position. I want to get on the right course."

A consultant hired earlier this year found both funds were losing money, had no reserves left and would continue to depend on infusions of taxpayer dollars without significant fee increases.

"We quickly determined that since 2001 to 2008 the sewer fund has been operating at an annual loss," said Andrew Burnham, vice president of Burton & Associates.

By the end of this year, transfers from the general fund to support the solid waste fund since 2001 will total about $440,000, according to the Burton study. Likewise, transfers to the sewer fund will total about $770,000.

Without the rate increases, continuing losses in the two funds would require more than $4-million in general fund loans over the next five years, according to Burnham.

Within five years, the proposed fee increases will result in the funds becoming self-sufficient.

In addition, the money "borrowed" from the general fund since 2001 will be repaid and reserves will be created equivalent to three months of working capital.

Burnham urged the city to review its sewer and garbage rates on a regular basis to ensure that the funds remain self-sustaining.

Some residents accused past city administrations of making illegal or improper money transfers to keep the two utility funds solvent.

"The loans from the general fund were advances and were legal," countered City Attorney Maura Kiefer, while adding that the action "was not the greatest accounting procedure."

Ed Pinero, a former city commissioner, urged the city to ask the state attorney general for a legal opinion on whether the city was required to pay back the general fund loans.

"We're not stupid," he said. "Listen to what we have to say. We put you up there to listen to us. Nobody denies that you need an increase, but how much it is is at issue."



[Last modified: Aug 17, 2008 07:56 PM]



Comments on this article
by John Aug 17, 2008 7:56 PM
The revenue shortfalls averaged 5% but they want a 60% increase, AND voted on a 49% mil rate (property tax)increase. We all know that raising taxes and increasing spending is always the EASY way out for politicians. Cutting spending is the hard part.
by Larry Aug 17, 2008 7:25 PM
Let the mayer pay for it he is the rich hippy who has 2 houses on the gulf
by Bill Aug 17, 2008 7:16 PM
Sounds like a load of crap! You shouldn't be charging for poo and trash just to make a profit! That what it's all about making a profit as a non profit company
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT