Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Clearwater to keep police, but now faces tough budget decisions

CLEARWATER — Despite the temptation of millions of dollars in savings, the City Council has decided to keep the Clearwater Police Department and not to hire the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office.

A pro-police crowd packed the council chambers at City Hall until the decision came late Thursday night. More than two dozen Clearwater residents pleaded with officials to stick with the city's police force, with only one speaker arguing in favor of switching to the Sheriff's Office to save money.

However, the city is still facing a budget crisis this summer. Since council members turned down Sheriff Jim Coats' money-saving offer, they're putting pressure on Police Chief Tony Holloway and City Manager Bill Horne to make significant cuts to the Police Department's $37.4 million budget.

"I think we're a city of such a size that we need our own police department," said Mayor Frank Hibbard. But later he added, "Clearly things are not going to be status quo."

The cuts might mean making do with fewer police supervisors and office staffers. Or teaming up with another local law enforcement agency and merging the dispatch centers that take emergency calls.

During the last few years of job cuts, Clearwater has mostly left its Police Department intact, choosing to lay off city employees elsewhere. But officials say the financial situation is so dire that they can no longer let the city's biggest department go untouched.

"I would rather turn CPD into a leaner operation" than contract with the Sheriff's Office, said Councilman Paul Gibson.

For his part, the police chief was less than enthused about cutting his budget.

"What are you willing to give up?" Holloway asked the council. "What cases are we not going to investigate?

The sheriff offered a tempting deal, pledging to keep the same number of patrol officers and detectives in Clearwater. And the police chief's own analysis concluded that the sheriff's plan would cost the city only $28.7 million a year — $8.7 million less than the Police Department's current annual budget.

So why not take the deal? Council members saved the Police Department for a number of reasons:

• They think Clearwater should have total control over how the department is run. With the sheriff in charge of law enforcement, city officials would have less control.

• They were spooked by the permanence of the decision. If the city got rid of its police force, there would be no going back.

• They decided they can save money by making budget cuts themselves.

• They felt that Clearwater officers would be getting a raw deal. Although the Sheriff's Office would hire the officers, it would be at reduced wages.

Clearwater residents who came to City Hall passionately defended the Police Department.

"We know our officers," said Susie Boshoff, president of the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association. "They come through our neighborhood and they know who's supposed to be there and who's not. I don't know that you can put a price tag on that."

Shelley Kuroghlian, president of the Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition, said she'd be willing to pay more to keep the police.

One dissenting voice was Joe Paige, a former City Council candidate who argued that from a strictly economic perspective, the city should consider bringing on the Sheriff's Office. "If we don't change course, our economy is headed for a catastrophe," he said.

Council members warned the public that sticking with the Police Department will likely mean steep cuts to services like libraries, parks and recreation.

"It's difficult to look at 8.7 million a year in savings and say we're just not going to do that," said Councilman John Doran.

He asked: How deep are people willing to cut other parts of the city government? Should Clearwater go down to one library and one recreation center? Should it resurface streets every 15 years instead of every 10?

Mike Brassfield can be reached at or (727) 445-4160.

Clearwater to keep police, but now faces tough budget decisions 05/21/10 [Last modified: Friday, May 21, 2010 7:22pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Search under way for missing sailors; Navy chief orders inquiry


    SINGAPORE — The U.S. Navy ordered a broad investigation Monday into the performance and readiness of the Pacific-based 7th Fleet after the USS John S. McCain collided with an oil tanker in Southeast Asian waters, leaving 10 U.S. sailors missing and others injured.

    Damage is visible as the USS John S. McCain steers toward Singapore’s naval base on Monday.
  2. Told not to look, Donald Trump looks at the solar eclipse


    Of course he looked.

    Monday's solar eclipse — life-giving, eye-threatening, ostensibly apolitical — summoned the nation's First Viewer to the Truman Balcony of the White House around 2:38 p.m. Eastern time.

    The executive metaphor came quickly.

    President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump view the solar eclipse from the Truman balcony of the White House, in Washington, Aug. 21, 2017. [Al Drago | New York Times]
  3. Secret Service says it will run out of money to protect Trump and his family Sept. 30


    WASHINGTON — The Secret Service said Monday that it has enough money to cover the cost of protecting President Donald Trump and his family through the end of September, but after that the agency will hit a federally mandated cap on salaries and overtime unless Congress intervenes.

    Secret service agents walk with President Donald Trump after a ceremony to welcome the 2016 NCAA Football National Champions the Clemson Tigers on the South Lawn of the White House on June 12, 2017. [Olivier Douliery | Sipa USA via TNS]
  4. After fraught debate, Trump to disclose new Afghanistan plan


    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump will unveil his updated Afghanistan policy Monday night in a rare, prime-time address to a nation that broadly shares his pessimism about American involvement in the 16-year conflict. Although he may send a few thousand more troops, there are no signs of a major shift in …

    U.S. soldiers patrol the perimeter of a weapons cache near the U.S. military base in Bagram, Afghanistan in 2003. Sixteen years of U.S. warfare in Afghanistan have left the insurgents as strong as ever and the nation's future precarious. Facing a quagmire, President Donald Trump on Monday will outline his strategy for a country that has historically snared great powers and defied easy solutions.  [Associated Press (2003)]
  5. Trial begins for man accused of threatening to kill Tampa federal judge


    TAMPA — Jason Jerome Springer was in jail awaiting trial on a firearms charge when he heard inmates talking about a case that had made the news.

    His attorney said Jason Jerome Springer, 39, just talked, and there was “no true threat.”