LAND O'LAKES — An environmental group has given county officials a list of demands that it wants met before it will agree to drop its challenge to the proposed T. Rowe Price project.
Only one of Citizens for Sanity's six demands is about T. Rowe Price.
The other five address broader development issues, from increasing wetland buffer zones to establishing wildlife ordinances.
Citizens for Sanity member Clay Colson said the group came up with the additional demands after County Commission Chairman Jack Mariano called him to try to persuade him to drop his permit challenge. Colson said the list is part of settlement discussions.
"They wanted to know what needed to be done," Colson said. "And when you ask me what needs to be done, I'll tell you what needs to be done."
State Sen. Mike Fasano questioned Citizens for Sanity's motivations, saying Colson had told him that he wanted only to get the county's attention.
"They have jeopardized a project because they're trying to send a message to the commission," Fasano said. "They should be ashamed of themselves."
Plans to lure the investment firm — and 1,600 jobs — to central Pasco hit a roadblock last week after Citizens filed its objection to Southwest Florida Water Management District's permit for the proposed office complex on 94 acres off State Road 54.
The environmental group objected to the proposed destruction of a wetland area on the site, which T. Rowe's engineers say is less than a quarter of an acre. Colson said in an interview that any passer-by can tell the wetland is much bigger than that.
County and state officials, who have been courting T. Rowe Price since last summer, say they are racing against the clock because the firm may walk away from its $26-million financial incentive package if the permit challenge takes too long.
Swiftmud spokeswoman Robyn Felix said Wednesday that district officials are hoping to expedite the administrative hearing on the matter.
Colson and fellow Citizens member Dan Rametta met Tuesday for about two hours with Mariano and County Administrator John Gallagher.
Colson and Rametta turned in their list, which was labeled "Proposed Concepts to Resolve the T. Rowe Price Project Matter."
No. 1 on the list was to require the protection of all wetlands and requests that any proposed wetland impacts on the T. Rowe Price parcel or the adjoining parcel to the east be stopped.
Colson said he is convinced the wetland that T. Rowe Price would pave over is larger than a quarter acre, in large part because the developer's engineering firm had already made a mistake in the wetlands delineation on the property just to the east.
He said the group won't drop its challenge unless the wetland is protected. If T. Rowe decides not to impact the wetland, Colson said he'd find another way to pursue the group's other demands.
He said the group will meet soon with other county officials and T. Rowe Price project officials.
Gallagher said Wednesday that he didn't think it was fair to tie the T. Rowe project to bigger policy issues that would require public input, study and time.
"These are larger, global issues that need to be addressed by the board (of County Commissioners)," said Gallagher. "I guess they feel this is something they can gain ground on."
Jodie Tillman can be reached at email@example.com or (727) 869-6247.