Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

First Amendment Foundation says St. Pete Beach City Commission violated Sunshine Law

ST. PETE BEACH — The nonprofit group that publishes the official guide for public officials on the state's Sunshine Law claims the City Commission has violated that law.

The First Amendment Foundation Inc. filed an amicus curiae brief Wednesday supporting the appeal by resident Bruce Kadoura of a case he brought against the city.

Kadoura, who recently lost a close election for mayor, filed multiple lawsuits against the city relating to the city's comprehensive plan.

In the case, he claims the city violated the Sunshine Law when it rejected a settlement offer and made a counter offer during a closed meeting with its attorneys.

Last year, Circuit Judge David Demers privately reviewed transcripts of a number of the City Commission's shade meetings and found "the meetings did not violate the Sunshine Law."

Although the judge found that "most" of the shade meeting discussions involved legal settlements and litigation strategies, he agreed the commission had made "some decisions" related to counterproposals.

State law allows local governments to meet privately with their attorneys to discuss strategy or settlement when they are sued, but it does not allow those "shade" meetings to include actions or decisions that should require formal action at a public meeting.

The foundation's brief to the 2nd District Court of Appeal maintains that Demers' ruling was in error.

"When a commission makes an unconditional offer which, if accepted, would finally settle a case without further action at a public hearing, the commission has violated the Sunshine Law by deciding to settle a case during a shade meting without public input or discussion," the foundation stated in its brief to the court.

The foundation maintains such a violation is an "irreparable injury" to the public.

The trial judge's decision in effect leaves it up to the city to decide if it is violating the Sunshine Law, according to the foundation.

"The trial court's decision converts any properly noticed shade meeting into a shield against disclosure, regardless of the subject of the discussions or whether final decisions are made," the brief states.

The brief notes that the city "consistently refused to produce the transcripts" of the shade meetings and "denied that any violation occurred."

The foundation's brief cited substantial case law relating to the Sunshine Law and concluded "the city did violate the Sunshine Law" by making decisions in shade meetings to settle pending litigation and approved counter-offers that should have been discussed in open meetings.

Ironically, in a special commission meeting Wednesday called to set a run-off election for mayor, the commission gave City Attorney Mike Davis permission to release some shade meeting transcripts "as a means of reducing your expenses."

The commission had met in a shade meeting prior to the public meeting.

How the transcript release will affect Kadoura's appeal or a related Sunshine Law violation case filed by resident Jim Anderson was not clear.

Ken Weiss, attorney for both Kadoura and Anderson, maintains the city deliberately uses shade meetings to avoid discussing controversial decisions in public.

The city's attorneys insist the commission has completely abided by the Sunshine Law.

First Amendment Foundation says St. Pete Beach City Commission violated Sunshine Law 03/12/11 [Last modified: Saturday, March 12, 2011 3:31am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Told not to look, Donald Trump looks at the solar eclipse

    National

    Of course he looked.

    Monday's solar eclipse — life-giving, eye-threatening, ostensibly apolitical — summoned the nation's First Viewer to the Truman Balcony of the White House around 2:38 p.m. Eastern time.

    The executive metaphor came quickly.

    President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump view the solar eclipse from the Truman balcony of the White House, in Washington, Aug. 21, 2017. [Al Drago | New York Times]
  2. Secret Service says it will run out of money to protect Trump and his family Sept. 30

    National

    WASHINGTON — The Secret Service said Monday that it has enough money to cover the cost of protecting President Donald Trump and his family through the end of September, but after that the agency will hit a federally mandated cap on salaries and overtime unless Congress intervenes.

    Secret service agents walk with President Donald Trump after a ceremony to welcome the 2016 NCAA Football National Champions the Clemson Tigers on the South Lawn of the White House on June 12, 2017. [Olivier Douliery | Sipa USA via TNS]
  3. After fraught debate, Trump to disclose new Afghanistan plan

    War

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump will unveil his updated Afghanistan policy Monday night in a rare, prime-time address to a nation that broadly shares his pessimism about American involvement in the 16-year conflict. Although he may send a few thousand more troops, there are no signs of a major shift in …

    U.S. soldiers patrol the perimeter of a weapons cache near the U.S. military base in Bagram, Afghanistan in 2003. Sixteen years of U.S. warfare in Afghanistan have left the insurgents as strong as ever and the nation's future precarious. Facing a quagmire, President Donald Trump on Monday will outline his strategy for a country that has historically snared great powers and defied easy solutions.  [Associated Press (2003)]
  4. Trial begins for man accused of threatening to kill Tampa federal judge

    Criminal

    TAMPA — Jason Jerome Springer was in jail awaiting trial on a firearms charge when he heard inmates talking about a case that had made the news.

    His attorney said Jason Jerome Springer, 39, just talked, and there was “no true threat.”


  5. Editorial: Tampa Electric customers should not pay for utility's fatal misjudgments

    Editorials

    There will be financial fallout from the terrible miscalculations that resulted in five workers being killed in June at Tampa Electric's Big Bend Power Station. State and federal regulators should ensure those costs are borne by the company's shareholders, not its customers. Monetary considerations will not begin to …

    LUIS SANTANA   |   Times
There will be financial fallout from the terrible miscalculations that resulted in five workers being killed in June at Tampa Electric's Big Bend Power Station. State and federal regulators should ensure those costs are borne by the company's shareholders, not its customers.