Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Group seeking referendum on the Pier plans to file most petitions Friday

Tom Lambdon and his group oppose plans to demolish the current Pier and say the 1973 structure can be renovated for less than the $50 million the city budgeted to replace it.

DIRK SHADD | Times (2010)

Tom Lambdon and his group oppose plans to demolish the current Pier and say the 1973 structure can be renovated for less than the $50 million the city budgeted to replace it.

ST. PETERSBURG — Sometime Friday afternoon, the group pushing for a referendum to preserve the city's iconic Pier expects to deliver the bulk of its petitions to City Hall.

The remainder, said Tom Lambdon, the Safety Harbor man who is leading the effort, will be dropped off early next week. The group's effort needs close to 16,000 petitions.

"We're comfortable that we're there," Lambdon said Tuesday, but added that he has been painstakingly purging those submitted by supporters who live outside St. Petersburg and are ineligible to vote.

Almost two weeks ago, his group mailed close to 40,000 postage-paid petitions across the city to ensure its goal.

"We don't want to send any kind of message that we're done," Lambdon said. "I don't want to be 50 short of stardom."

Lambdon and his group oppose plans to demolish the current Pier and say the 1973 structure can be renovated for less than the $50 million the city budgeted to replace it.

The city says the superstructure of the Pier approach and Pier head — the area surrounding the five-story structure — is crumbling, and the cost of renovation would be prohibitive. It recently signed a contract with Michael Maltzan Architecture, the Los Angeles designer of the new Pier referred to as the Lens. The plan is to demolish the old Pier next summer. is rushing to get the measure on the November ballot. Mayor Bill Foster had given the group until June 11 to submit its petitions, a deadline that he said would allow time for the city clerk to count the petitions, City Council members to consider an ordinance to put the issue on the ballot, and for the petitions to be delivered to the supervisor of elections.

"I've never wanted to stand in their way," Foster said.

Lambdon's delayed delivery is "going to make it hard, but not impossible," for council members to meet the city's deadline, Foster said.

But City Council member Leslie Curran, who sat on the Pier Advisory Task Force and the jury that chose the Lens design, said the mayor already gave a deadline.

"It seems the rules are being changed for one group,'' she said, going on to outline the yearslong public process that brought the project to this point. "So now we want the side that abided by the rules to wait while we put something on the ballot at the last minute."

City Council member Jeff Danner says he is torn about what he will decide.

"I think that there was a lot of misinformation given to people to sign those petitions," he said. "We've had this process going on for five years, and all of sudden people are energized in this 11th hour. I talked to a lot of people this weekend who like the Lens."

Lambdon's group has attracted support from at least one influential businessman. Bud Risser of Risser Oil Corp., who has urged Foster not to build the Lens, has given money to the cause, but declines to say how much.

"I frequently give money to people whose passion I value," he said. "I value their willingness to do something. At least these people are doing something, whether you agree with them or not."

City Council member Wengay Newton, who opposes the new Pier, anticipates a successful completion of Lambdon's petition drive.

"I can't wait for the day when the supervisor of elections certifies all these petitions. It's going to get real exciting. It's a shame that people have to go through all this," he said. "Everybody should get to vote."

Waveney Ann Moore can be reached at [email protected] or (727) 892-2283.

Group seeking referendum on the Pier plans to file most petitions Friday 07/04/12 [Last modified: Thursday, July 5, 2012 8:57am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Editorial: The unknown price tags in the mayor's race


    St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Kriseman has been busy promoting all sorts initiatives in the months leading up to the Nov. 7 election, doubling down on his progressive agenda without spending much money or generating much controversy. But make no mistake, the cost will come due after the election. Without a change in …

    The mayor is determined to get artist Janet Echelman to create a sculpture for the new Pier. But the cost would be much higher than what is allocated. Above is Echelman’s As If It Were Already Here in Boston.
  2. Massachusetts firm buys Tampa's Element apartment tower

    Real Estate

    TAMPA — Downtown Tampa's Element apartment tower sold this week to a Massachusetts-based real estate investment company that plans to upgrade the skyscraper's amenities and operate it long-term as a rental community.

    The Element apartment high-rise at 808 N Franklin St. in downtown Tampa has been sold to a Northland Investment Corp., a Massachusetts-based real estate investment company. JIM DAMASKE  |  Times
  3. Judge won't cut prison term of man who pleads obesity


    TAMPA — A claim of obesity won't shave time off a Tampa man's prison sentence.

    Duane Crithfield and Stephen Donaldson Sr. were sentenced to prison after marketing a fraudulent offshore tax strategy known as a "Business Protection Plan" to medical practices, offering doctors and others coverage against unlikely events such as a kidnapping.
  4. Advocates for charter, public schools argue their cases at education forum


    TAMPA — Advocates of charter schools argued for diversity in education while supporters of traditional public schools charged that state funding is stacked against them during a forum Friday titled "Choices in Education."

    Schools such as Winthrop Charter School deserve greater public support, their operators say, because they offer a choice in education that is popular among parents. Public school advocates say charter and voucher schools represent a double standard in accountability and enrollment. [WILL VRAGOVIC  |  Times]
  5. Editorial: UF shows how to preserve free speech


    The University of Florida was forced to navigate a treacherous terrain of constitutional concerns and public safety this week, all in a glaring public spotlight. In the end, Thursday's appearance by Richard Spencer was a success — as much as an unwelcome visit from a notorious white nationalist can be. The …