Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

In just 75 words, St. Pete Beach to ask voters to forego small changes in land-use plan

ST. PETE BEACH — City officials are finding it very hard — and fraught with potential legal challenges — to write 75 words that ask voters to give up their right to weigh in on minor changes to the city's land development code.

The city has spent more than $240,000 this year to defend lawsuits relating to last year's 75-word referendum questions — the maximum allowed by law — again relating to the city's comprehensive plan and land development codes.

"This is a very tricky situation to get right," said Commissioner Christopher Leonard during a workshop session on Monday to discuss a referendum question proposed for the November ballot.

A charter change approved by voters in 2006 requires all comprehensive plan changes, as well as land development regulations affecting height and density, be put to voters before taking effect.

What the city wants is to not require voters to decide on minor changes to the city's comprehensive plan, including those mandated by the state.

Such required changes do not always coincide with regularly scheduled elections. When they do not, the city must spend roughly $20,000 to hold a special election.

Monday, the commission spent several hours debating just how two, 75-word referendum questions and their related charter changes should be worded.

"Many residents said they didn't want to vote on every issue that came down the pike," Commissioner Beverly Garnett said Monday. "When this was put into play, they didn't think there would be any comp plan voting except every eight, 10 years."

Instead, it has become apparent that there must be comprehensive plan changes virtually every year.

"The objective is to simplify the overall process and reduce costs," said Commissioner Jim Parent.

Dozens of residents spoke, some urging "clarity" while others urging that no change be made at all.

"Some of language is confusing. You need to write at a third- or sixth-grade level so everyone can understand," said resident Jim Anderson.

Bill Pyle, whose lawsuits have contributed to much of the city's legal bills, argued the city should not change its charter "until something much clearer comes up."

The debate will continue at today's Planning Board meeting. The commission must approve the wording by July 28 in order for the two referendum questions to appear on the November ballot.

So far, here are the questions:

• "Ordinance 2009-, amends Section 3.15 of the City Charter to require voter approval of comprehensive plan amendments except those affecting five or fewer parcels, those mandated by state law after the effective date of this amendment, or those addressing capital improvements, public infrastructure facilities, public educational facilities, coastal and conservation requirements, or intergovernmental coordination. Should Ordinance 2009- be approved?"

• "Ordinance 2009-, amends Section 3.18 City Charter to eliminate the requirement of submitting to a vote of the electors an amendment to the City Land Development Code which increases the allowable height of any structure (as defined by the Land Development Code) which amendment is required to conform the City Land Development Code to voter approved Comprehensive Plan or Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Should Ordinance 2009- be approved?"

In just 75 words, St. Pete Beach to ask voters to forego small changes in land-use plan 07/14/09 [Last modified: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 5:28pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Pinellas grants St. Pete's request to add millions to pier budget

    Local Government

    Times Staff Writer

    The Pinellas County Commission has granted St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Kriseman's request to dedicate millions in county funding toward the city's new pier.

    The St. Petersburg City Council on Thursday  voted 7-1 to appropriate $17.6 million for the over-water portion of the Pier District. This is a rendering of what the new Pier District could look like. [Courtesy of St. Petersburg]
  2. Man injured when small helicopter crashes into Odessa home


    ODESSA — Firefighters and sheriff's deputies were investigating Monday after a small helicopter crashed into the roof of a house in northwest Hillsborough County.

    Rescuers respond to a crash of a small helicopter on the roof of a home in the Odessa area on Monday. [Hillsborough County Fire Rescue]
  3. State investigation cites multiple failures in death of Largo child


    LARGO — It was sweltering in the bedroom of the Largo mobile home the day a child welfare case manager visited in July.

    Liz Rutenbeck, 24, poses with her son William in a Facebook photo. Baby William Hendrickson IV died while his mother was in jail after police said his father left ihim in a sweltering room.  A state investigation into the boy's death found multiple failures on the part of the child welfare system.
  4. 'Siesta Key' star punched in face, not sure who did it


    TAMPA —Alex Kompothecras, cast member on MTV's reality show "Siesta Key," tells police he was punched in the face outside a bar in Tampa's SoHo district.

    Alex Kompothecras, Juliette Porter, Pauly Apostolides, Madisson Hausburg, Chloe Trautman, Garrett Miller, Kelsey Owens and Brandon Gomes pose for a photo in Siesta Key in June before the debut of the MTV reality series Siesta Key. [
EVE EDELHEIT   |   Times]
  5. Editorial: Senate health care bill would be disastrous for Florida


    The frantic effort by Senate Republicans to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act with something — anything — ranks raw politics over sound policy and threatens the health care of millions of Floridians. It is a desperate attempt to declare victory by shifting responsibility from the federal government …

    Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., speaks in August in Doral.