Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Judge tosses St. Pete Beach comprehensive plan; city looks to March election

ST. PETE BEACH — Circuit Judge David Demers doubled down Wednesday on an earlier decision invalidating the city's comprehensive plan.

The City Commission is expected to appeal the multiple rulings and will consider whether to ask voters to repeal a City Charter requirement that most of them have acknowledged has cost nearly $1 million in legal fees.

City officials hope the March municipal election will duplicate November's high city voter turnout (42 percent, double the normal turnout) and the sharp rejection (60 percent) of a state constitutional amendment imposing a similar Hometown Democracy-style voter requirement statewide.

Since a 2006 voter-approved referendum, the charter has required voters to approve all changes to the city's comprehensive plan or development regulations involving changes in building height or density.

Two years later, voters approved a new comprehensive plan and related development regulations.

In a lawsuit subsequently filed against the city by resident and now mayoral candidate Bruce Kadoura, the judge effectively told the city Wednesday that its comprehensive plan was presented improperly to voters on the 2008 ballot.

He said the same thing in November in a related lawsuit filed by resident Bill Pyle.

"This was a victory for the citizens and the taxpayers. The plan placed unfair burdens on the taxpayer," said Ken Weiss, attorney for both Kadoura and Pyle.

In the Pyle lawsuit, Demers agreed with Pyle's complaint that the language used to describe the 2008 referendum question was inadequate, particularly because the ballot summary did not tell voters that the then-proposed comprehensive plan involved increases in height and density.

The Pyle ruling, which was clarified but not substantively changed Wednesday, was cited by Demers in his decision in the Kadoura case.

The city and its co-defendant, Save Our Little Village, a political action group that drafted the comprehensive plan, did win on several points in the Kadoura case.

In the Kadoura case, the judge refused to invalidate the original settlement between the city and SOLV that led to the 2008 referendum.

"The voters decided the proper course and they could have rejected the plan," the judge ruled, also rejecting Kadoura's contention that residents were not given proper notice of the ordinance establishing the comprehensive plan.

"The purpose of the notice was met by the election and public debate that took place," Demers said.

But even though voters approved the plan, the judge said that if the city wanted that plan to be in effect — or any other plan different from the pre-2008 comprehensive plan — it would have to go back to the voters.

"This Final Judgment does not bar the city from holding another referendum," Demers stressed in his order.

The ordinance establishing the comprehensive plan does not have to be changed, he added, but the ballot language describing the ordinance does have to comply with the City Charter and state law.

Commissioners will meet with City Attorney Mike Davis on Thursday to discuss the rulings and possible referendum questions for the March ballot.

Judge tosses St. Pete Beach comprehensive plan; city looks to March election 01/01/11 [Last modified: Saturday, January 1, 2011 3:31am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Record $417 million awarded in lawsuit linking baby powder to cancer


    LOS ANGELES — A Los Angeles jury on Monday ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay a record $417 million to a hospitalized woman who claimed in a lawsuit that the talc in the company's iconic baby powder causes ovarian cancer when applied regularly for feminine hygiene.

    A bottle of Johnson's baby powder is displayed. On Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, a Los Angeles County Superior Court spokeswoman confirmed that a jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $417 million in a case to a woman who claimed in a lawsuit that the talc in the company's iconic baby powder causes ovarian cancer when applied regularly for feminine hygiene. [Associated Press]
  2. Search under way for missing sailors; Navy chief orders inquiry


    SINGAPORE — The U.S. Navy ordered a broad investigation Monday into the performance and readiness of the Pacific-based 7th Fleet after the USS John S. McCain collided with an oil tanker in Southeast Asian waters, leaving 10 U.S. sailors missing and others injured.

    Damage is visible as the USS John S. McCain steers toward Singapore’s naval base on Monday.
  3. Told not to look, Donald Trump looks at the solar eclipse


    Of course he looked.

    Monday's solar eclipse — life-giving, eye-threatening, ostensibly apolitical — summoned the nation's First Viewer to the Truman Balcony of the White House around 2:38 p.m. Eastern time.

    The executive metaphor came quickly.

    President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump view the solar eclipse from the Truman balcony of the White House, in Washington, Aug. 21, 2017. [Al Drago | New York Times]
  4. Secret Service says it will run out of money to protect Trump and his family Sept. 30


    WASHINGTON — The Secret Service said Monday that it has enough money to cover the cost of protecting President Donald Trump and his family through the end of September, but after that the agency will hit a federally mandated cap on salaries and overtime unless Congress intervenes.

    Secret service agents walk with President Donald Trump after a ceremony to welcome the 2016 NCAA Football National Champions the Clemson Tigers on the South Lawn of the White House on June 12, 2017. [Olivier Douliery | Sipa USA via TNS]
  5. After fraught debate, Trump to disclose new Afghanistan plan


    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump will unveil his updated Afghanistan policy Monday night in a rare, prime-time address to a nation that broadly shares his pessimism about American involvement in the 16-year conflict. Although he may send a few thousand more troops, there are no signs of a major shift in …

    U.S. soldiers patrol the perimeter of a weapons cache near the U.S. military base in Bagram, Afghanistan in 2003. Sixteen years of U.S. warfare in Afghanistan have left the insurgents as strong as ever and the nation's future precarious. Facing a quagmire, President Donald Trump on Monday will outline his strategy for a country that has historically snared great powers and defied easy solutions.  [Associated Press (2003)]