Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Mystery deepens over botched Election Day robocalls in Pinellas County

LARGO — The mystery of Pinellas County's confusing Election Day robocalls deepened Thursday as elections supervisor Deborah Clark reiterated via a news release that her office was not to blame.

But then she refused to discuss any details about what did happen.

It was the second day Clark refused to answer questions about the robocalls. Instead, she dribbled out three sporadic and incomplete written statements.

The California company she hired to send out the calls — CallFire Inc. — also failed to respond to repeated requests for comment Thursday.

Clark had blamed CallFire for the fiasco on Tuesday night. On Wednesday, CallFire's CEO fired back that Clark's office had initiated the calls.

On Thursday, both refused to answer questions.

The calls first went out to voters on Monday, saying they had until "tomorrow" to cast their ballots. It targeted people who had requested absentee ballots but not yet sent them back.

That message was fine on Monday. But then the same call went out to thousands of people Tuesday morning — an obvious mistake because, by then, "tomorrow" meant Wednesday, the day after the election.

On election night, Clark told a Tampa Bay Times reporter that CallFire was to blame.

"We used a vendor to do this," Clark said. "The vendor was supposed to finish the calls yesterday (Monday)."

The office IT manager discovered Tuesday morning that some calls were never sent, she said.

"He was looking at a spreadsheet for the calls when he came in this morning, and realized they had not completed them. What the vendor did this morning (Tuesday) was go ahead and complete the calls this morning without consulting us, using the script from yesterday."

CallFire CEO Dinesh Ravishanker squarely placed the blame on Clark's office. Pinellas — like other clients — completely controlled both the content of the calls and when they were sent out, he said Wednesday.

CallFire's records show that someone in the elections office signed into the account on the CallFire website at 4:30 p.m. Monday and clicked a button to start the calls, Ravishanker said. Then someone halted the calls at 8 p.m. Monday and started them back up at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, he said. "Someone in their office logged in and clicked start and made a very bad mistake," Ravishanker said.

News of the botched calls went viral on Election Day, with rating it the nation's biggest Election Day blunder.

After Ravishanker made his statement around noon Wednesday, Clark declined to answer further questions and also declined a request early Thursday for a face-to-face interview.

At 1:04 p.m. Thursday — more than 48 hours after the calls went out — Clark's spokeswoman, Nancy Whitlock, issued a two-sentence statement that Clark would not talk "until all of the facts have been gathered."

At 6:20 p.m., Whitlock released a four-paragraph statement. It contained no information about who initiated the calls nor why, and Whitlock told the Times via text message that Clark would answer no further questions Thursday night.

That statement did add a few details.

"At 8:34 a.m. we discovered that all of the calls were not completed on November 5, and the remaining calls had resumed at 8:00 a.m."

The supervisor's office then immediately halted the calls and began sending out new calls to the same voters 22 minutes later, correcting the misinformation, the statement said.

Within three hours, 99 percent of voters who had received the bad call also received the correction.

The statement slightly misstated the content of the initial, erroneous phone calls.

"We used an automated dialing service to initiate a courtesy call to 38,702 Pinellas County voters to remind them that the election was tomorrow and to return their mail ballots by 7 p.m. Election Day," the statement said.

Actually, a script of the calls that Clark's office provided Tuesday told people to return their mail ballots "by 7 p.m. tomorrow," not "by 7 p.m. Election Day."

The statement did not say how many people received the bad message, but said that staffers personally called 46 — or about 1 percent — to inform them of the error. That would indicate that about 4,600 people were initially told they could vote on Wednesday.

The Times previously reported that 12,500 people may have received the erroneous call, but that was based on the number of people on the list who were not called on Monday. Fewer may have received the erroneous call Tuesday if elections officials did indeed stop them quickly.

Pressed by the Times for an opportunity to question Clark directly, Whitlock emailed one last statement at 7:21 p.m. Thursday.

This time, Whitlock reiterated that the elections office did not initiate the confusing Tuesday morning calls.

"We DID NOT restart the calls and did not realize they had resumed at 8 a.m. on November 6," the statement said. "We did not log onto the system until 8:34 a.m., to STOP the calls. We did not want the calls to be made on Election Day."

Left unanswered was what conversations Clark's office has had with CallFire over the last three days.

It is not clear whether the robocalls discouraged or disenfranchised any voters. Whitlock said early Wednesday that the Tuesday morning calls did not give either Democrats or Republicans any particular advantage. The call list did not include party affiliation, she said.

CallFire is known for working with Democratic candidates.

Ravishanker did not return two telephone calls, two emails and a Twitter message Thursday.

At one point, an employee in his office said he was busy with post-election business but would return a call soon.

But he did not.

.Let us know

Hed goes here

Did you experience election problems, with robocalls or any other matter? Please send a brief explanation, with your name and telephone number, to

Mystery deepens over botched Election Day robocalls in Pinellas County 11/08/12 [Last modified: Thursday, November 8, 2012 11:31pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Bucs talk social issues, protests at team meeting


    TAMPA — Each time Dirk Koetter walks through the door of his office at One Buc Place, he passes by the only jersey framed on his wall.

    Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Mike Evans (13) wears custom cleats to represent Ross Initiative in Sports for Equality (RISE) as part of the NFL???‚??„?s "My Cause, My Cleats Campaign" before the start of a football game between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and San Diego Chargers at Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego, Calif., on Sunday, Dec. 4, 2016.
  2. UPS relocates express operations from St. Pete-Clearwater to TIA


    TAMPA — United Parcel Service Inc. is switching airports for its express air operations. Beginning in October, UPS will relocate from St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport to Tampa International Airport.

    Beginning in October, UPS will move from St. Pete-Clearwater International Airport to Tampa International Airport. [Associated Press file photo]

  3. St. Petersburg man shot in arm during home invasion robbery


    ST. PETERSBURG — One man was arrested on charges he shot another man in the arm while attempting to rob a home in what St. Petersburg police are calling a drug-related incident.

    John Alam, 25, faces charges of home invasion robbery, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and possession of a firearm by a felon after deputies said he tried to rob a home Wednesday morning and ended up shooting someone. [Courtesy of Pinellas County Sheriff's Office]
  4. Bob Buckhorn, a mayor who knows what he wants, surveys constituents on what they want


    TAMPA — Focus has not been a problem — or really, even a question — during the six-plus years that Mayor Bob Buckhorn has been in office.

    Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn keeps a digital countdown clock in his office showing the days, hours. minutes and seconds until he is term-limited out of office on April 1, 2019. As of Wednesday, he had 584 days to go. [City of Tampa]