Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Oldsmar council clucks about chickens but doesn't outright ban them

OLDSMAR — The City Council was poised to make a choice: Allow chickens or ban them.

It decided to do neither.

That means residents who own chickens can keep them if no one cries fowl.

Some people in the city want to keep chickens. A lot already have them, according to council member Janice Miller, who asked the council to consider the matter.

For years, Oldsmar outlawed chickens. Or at least, that was the common belief. But after a closer inspection of the code, it wasn't exactly clear, said City Manager Bruce Haddock.

It's livestock that's banned in city neighborhoods and the city code doesn't define livestock.

At a meeting Tuesday, Mayor Jim Ronecker said he doesn't want to "ruffle any feathers," but he thinks chickens are already banned. He read a 2003 city resolution that sought to change Oldsmar's post office classification from rural to urban. And that very resolution states that the city "no longer has cows, pigs, chickens or other livestock."

Fowl proponents rave about the convenience and earth-friendly advantages of having chickens laying eggs in their back yards. But Ronecker was worried about something they rarely mention: What happens to the chickens a few years down the road, when they stop laying eggs?

"I don't know if I want people to start slaughtering chickens in their back yards," he said.

Council member Linda Norris, who is pro-chicken, said they should cross that road when they come to it. She didn't think people were going to start whacking hens. And if that happens, she said, the city can always revisit the issue.

City Attorney Tom Trask drafted two options for city leaders to consider: a pro-chicken proposal and an anti-chicken code amendment that would include chickens in the list of banned livestock.

The pro-chicken proposal required people to clean up after their chickens. But Vice Mayor Doug Bevis said he talked to people who live in chicken-friendly communities and that doesn't always happen.

"My friend I was talking to today, he says it smells to high heaven," Bevis said.

And council member Jerry Beverland, who is anti-chicken, said chickens are a lot more work than people think. He should know because when he was a young teen in Largo, he was a member of the Future Farmers of America and one of his projects was chickens.

Three city residents spoke in favor of chickens and a few supporters wrote city leaders, too.

Nobody spoke out against chickens at Tuesday's meeting, but a couple of residents wrote City Hall to oppose them.

Resident Charles Winscott said city leaders have done a pretty good job overcoming outsiders' assumptions that Oldsmar is a "hick town." Allowing chickens would do just the opposite, he wrote in an email.

"Have you ever heard of the Beverly Hillbillies?" he asked.

Ultimately, Ronecker suggested the council do nothing. Miller asked the city manager if people who own chickens will get punished.

"I don't think the code prohibits them the way it's written now," Haddock said.

If the city gets a complaint about chickens smelling up a neighborhood, someone from the city will likely check it out, Haddock said. But city workers aren't going to drive down the street looking for chickens in people's back yards.

"I move we do nothing," Miller said.

"Point of order," Haddock said, "You technically don't need a motion to do nothing."

In the end, council members, pro-chicken and anti-chicken, reached a compromise and agreed to leave things alone.

After the meeting, pro-chicken resident Robin Friesz said she was satisfied.

"With the lack of support we had, that was probably the best option," Friesz said. "If you're a responsible chicken owner, you could fly under the radar."

Lorri Helfand can be reached at or (727) 445-4155. Go to to write a letter to the editor.

Oldsmar council clucks about chickens but doesn't outright ban them 03/07/12 [Last modified: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 7:58pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. South Florida poaches debris pickup trucks once slotted for Tampa, officials say


    TAMPA — A week into the job of picking up an estimated 300,000 cubic yards of Hurricane Irma debris from its streets, Tampa City Hall is finding to its dismay that the challenge is more competitive than expected.

    A city of Tampa truck loaded with debris from Hurricane Irma pulls into a temporary storage yard on N Rome Avenue Friday morning. There, workers from Tetra Tech, the city's debris monitoring contractor, photograph and check the load from an elevated platform to create a record that the city can use later to seek reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  2. Wisniewska: I protected our students and USFSP campus


    Throughout my tenure in academia, my focus has always been on putting students first.

    The USF St. Petersburg Campus, Thursday, June 19, 2014.
  3. Bucs defensive end Chris Baker (90) is seen during training camp last month at One Buc Place. [LOREN ELLIOTT   |   Times]
  4. Bucs' defensive attributes in opener included flexibility


    TAMPA — It's a blink-and-you-miss-it nuance, but in Sunday's opener against Chicago, on their very first defensive snap, the Bucs lined up in a 3-4 defense.

    Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coach Dirk Koetter shakes hands with cornerback Brent Grimes (24) before an NFL game between the Chicago Bears and Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Fla., on Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017. LOREN ELLIOTT   |   Times 

  5. Along the Alafia River, the grateful extend a hand to the Irma-sodden weary (w/video)


    LITHIA — The things that make a house a home dried in the afternoon sun Thursday in a front yard on Williams Street.

    Volunteers from FishHawk Fellowship Church helped Brian Hood (left) clean up debris from his yard in Valrico, Fla. Last week the Alafia River reached a depth of almost 23 feet, about 10 feet above its flood stage. Many homes were damaged, some became uninhabitable. Hood's home is 6 inches above Lithia Pinecrest Road, and did not sustain flood damage, though not all of his neighbors were as lucky.   [MONICA HERNDON   |   Times]