Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Pasco plan to ban smoking may not come with cash savings

NEW PORT RICHEY — Hoping to save money, Pasco County wants to trim some nagging expenses:

Related News/Archive


Yes, smokers need more medical care and take more sick days, says the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A smoker costs nearly $3,400 a year in extra medical costs and lost productivity.

So, keep them off Pasco's 2,300-person workforce and the savings will roll in, right?


Major health insurance companies say they don't offer a discount for employers who bar smokers. And other government agencies that have adopted such a policy cannot pinpoint any savings.

"It has not been an industry standard to offer a discount for not hiring smokers, simply because the data-gathering would be so difficult," said Valerie Rubin, spokeswoman for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, the state's largest insurer.

If officials approve the policy this summer, Pasco would join a small but growing resistance to hiring smokers, particularly in the public sector. Tampa Bay area sheriff's offices already bar tobacco users from their payrolls, and firefighters aren't supposed to smoke by state law.

Healthier? Yes. More productive? Maybe. Thriftier? Well ...

In 1995, the Florida Supreme Court upheld North Miami's hiring ban on smokers (unlike 30 other states, Florida doesn't have any kind of smokers' rights law). But the city dropped the policy five years ago. Officials realized they needed a bigger applicant pool, and they could not find any savings from the ban.

Pinellas and Pasco counties' sheriff offices say they can't show a savings after several years of turning smokers away. And the rising costs of health care have dwarfed any savings the policy brought Atlantic Beach, a city of 13,000 near Jacksonville.

"If they're looking to cut costs so much, why don't they just stop having 75 meetings to determine who's going to buy pencils?" scoffed Kevin Holobaugh, 46, a two-pack-a-day smoker from New Port Richey.

But Pasco's leading advocate for the policy, County Commissioner Michael Cox, said whatever the savings, reducing smoking "is the right thing to do."

According to the CDC, part of the cost of smoking is $1,700 in lost productivity per worker per year. Besides a healthier workforce, officials in communities with hiring bans say the workforce can become more productive. They miss less work. And ultimately, the health care claims decrease — helping lower rates.

But for now, the discounts mainly go to self-insured employers, who cover the total health insurance risk, and people who buy individual policies.

Only 1 percent of employers specifically bar tobacco users, according to a national survey by the Society for Human Resource Management in January 2006. But the share of employers who prefer to not hire smokers rose to 7 percent from 4 percent two years earlier.

Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce officials said they've seen no trend in local businesses embracing such a ban, although national companies such as Union Pacific have made headlines for not hiring smokers.

With property tax revenue dropping, more public agencies are stepping into the debate. Naples officials recently discussed it, as did Melbourne a few years ago. Cox modeled Pasco's proposal after a policy Sarasota County adopted in May, in which job applicants must take a nicotine test. (Current employees are exempt from the ban.)

"It started to make sense for the county, particularly to show that when tax revenues are being scrutinized, that we're doing something to save money," said Sarasota benefits manager Steve Marcinko, who expects to realize the $3,400-per-worker savings projected by the CDC.

But smoker Kirk Petrunak, 46, of Dunedin said such a policy doesn't make sense: It makes for discrimination. Other unhealthy habits, such as overeating or alcohol use, aren't being targeted. And current employees who smoke could keep on puffing — they would be grandfathered in.

Commission Chairman Ted Schrader said banning other vices could be dicey: obesity, for instance, can be influenced by genetics. But he said because of the potential savings, barring smokers is "the best choice you can make because of health care costs and what it does to co-workers, taxpayers and constituents who come to the county."

Critics, however, argue the payoff isn't there.

"I think the way they're doing it, it won't produce any kind of immediate savings," said Joseph Barton, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who represents smokers in discrimination cases. "The troubling thing is, the people we're seeing right behind the smokers is people who are overweight. Where does this end?"

Times researcher Shirl Kennedy contributed to this report. David DeCamp can be reached at [email protected] or (800) 333-7505, ext. 6232.

Pasco plan to ban smoking may not come with cash savings 06/21/08 [Last modified: Monday, June 23, 2008 5:07pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Dunedin man arrested for having destruction devices, deputies say

    Public Safety

    DUNEDIN — Deputies will be speaking later today to discuss a Dunedin man who was charged with possessing destruction devices in his home.

  2. Officials release names of those aboard plane that landed in St. Pete neighborhood


    ST. PETERSBURG — Officials released the names of the two people aboard the plane that made an emergency landing Wednesday on a neighborhood street in south St. Petersburg.

  3. Spencer: 'A better and more beautiful world if people like me were in power'


    In the a small theater crammed with cameras, Richard Spencer and a small group of his coordinators clashed with reporters as his controversial speech in the Phillips Center drew near Thursday.

    A crowd gathers ahead of Richard Spencer's appearance at the University of Florida on Oct. 19, 2017. [LUIS SANTANA | Times]
  4. Analysis: George W. Bush's unmistakable takedown of Trumpism - and Trump


    For the last nine years, George W. Bush has largely stayed out of presidential politics; he declined to criticize his successor, Barack Obama, and he chose not to endorse but largely ignored President Donald Trump. While Mitt Romney and others spoke out publicly against Trump, Bush stayed above the fray.

    That …

    Former President George W. Bush speaks at a forum sponsored by the George W. Bush Institute in New York on Thursday, Oct. 19, 2017. [Seth Wenig | Associated Press]
  5. Fennelly: Even frustrated Bucs fans hold out hope


    Many fans wrote back when I threw out an all-points the other day, asking if Bucs fans are perpetually in a state of expecting the worst.

    Bucs fans cheer during a preseason game against the Washington Redskins in August at Raymond James Stadium.