Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Pier petition deadline comes and goes

ST. PETERSBURG — According to Mayor Bill Foster's calculations, Monday was the beginning of the end for the group trying to force a vote on the Pier, which is set to be replaced.

Foster had given voteonthepier.com a June 11 deadline to submit the almost 16,000 petitions needed to get on the Nov. 6 ballot. But Monday came and went without a single petition delivered to City Hall.

Wengay Newton, who is the sole council member against the new $50 million Pier and who signed the first petition in 2010, called Foster's deadline arbitrary.

"The petitions are good for two years. … How are you going to tell 16,000 registered voters you can't vote and then say, 'Vote for me?' " he said.

"I'm not trying to dictate their timing,'' Foster said. "I'm trying to give them the best road map possible to even have a chance of getting something on the ballot."

Foster said he factored in time for the city clerk to count the petitions, for the council to consider an ordinance to put the issue on the ballot and for the petitions to be delivered to the supervisor of elections by the Aug. 3 deadline.

"This August date is really the driving force to have anything on the November ballot," Foster said. "I do not support a special election. This is really it."

Tom Lambdon, the Safety Harbor man heading the voteonthepier.com effort, said the group has 14,100 petitions and will have the required number within two weeks.

"We have time to get this done,'' he said.

Lambdon's group may have options. The council could agree to a special election, at a cost of about $300,000. The council also could pass an emergency ordinance by July 26 to get the question on the November ballot.

"I have to look very carefully at the merit of doing that,'' said council member Steve Kornell. "They've had 18 months to try to get things together.''

City attorney John Wolfe has said that legally, the city does not have to hold an election. The city charter addresses petitions only for ordinances. Foster has said the Pier question should be on the ballot if the group collects the petitions. Meanwhile, the city has signed a contract with Michael Maltzan Architecture, designer of the new Pier, and set next May 31 as the date for closing the current structure.

"The beauty of a November election is we are still in the conceptual stage," Foster said. "We need finality."

Council member Charlie Gerdes said he might consider an ordinance to put the question on the November ballot. As for the actual question, he said it should contain "accurate information about what the consequences would be" for preserving or renovating the inverted pyramid.

"What it would cost and how many subsidies would it require every single year after that?"

Council member Karl Nurse also would feel obligated to put the measure on the ballot if the petitions are received, but he wants to make sure voters understand the cost.

"We really have done a poor job communicating the condition of the Pier and the choices,'' he said. "We really should have been able to communicate how structurally unstable the Pier was."

Waveney Ann Moore can be reached at wmoore@tampabay.com or (727) 892-2283.

FAST FACTS

Public input sessions

6 p.m., today, Enoch Davis Center, 1111 18th Ave. S

6 p.m., Thursday, J.W. Cate Recreation Center, 5801 22nd Ave. N

6 p.m. June 19, Lake Vista Recreation Center, 1401 62nd Ave. S.

.

Public input sessions

6 p.m. today, Enoch Davis Center, 1111 18th Ave. S

6 p.m. Thursday, J.W. Cate Recreation Center, 5801 22nd Ave. N

6 p.m. June 19, Lake Vista Recreation Center, 1401 62nd Ave. S

Pier petition deadline comes and goes 06/11/12 [Last modified: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:41pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Editorial: A proud moment for civic involvement in Hillsborough County

    Editorials

    It took private citizens less than 24 hours to do what their elected leaders in Hillsborough County could not for the past three months: Find the moral fortitude and the money to move a century-old Confederate war memorial from outside the county courthouse. Thursday's achievement was a lesson in leadership to county …

    The Hillsborough County Commission dithered for three months over moving the Memoria in Aeterna monument from the old county courthouse.
  2. Fort Myers woman arrested for doing cocaine off iPhone in parent pick-up line

    Bizarre News

    A Fort Myers woman was arrested Tuesday after police saw her snorting cocaine off her iPhone while in the parent pick-up line at a Lee County middle school.

    Christina Hester, 39, faces two different drug-related charges, according to police records. [Lee County Sheriff's Office]
  3. Tropical Storm Harvey forms in Atlantic

    Hurricanes

    UPDATE: At 5 p.m. the National Hurricane Center said a hurricane hunter plane had determined that Tropical Storm Harvey had formed with sustained winds of 40 mph.

    Three tropical waves are expected to strengthen as they move across the Atlantic Ocean. [Courtesy of the National Hurricane Center]
  4. Editorial: Pinellas should join lawsuit challenging new state law

    Editorials

    The Florida Legislature has been on a cynical, constitutionally dubious quest to render local school boards powerless. The most direct assault is a new state law that strips school boards of much of their authority when it comes to the creation and funding of charter schools. It's time for the Pinellas County School …

  5. Editorial: Fix funding unfairness in Florida foster care system

    Editorials

    Many of the children in Florida's foster care system already have been failed by their parents. The last thing these kids need is to be failed by bureaucracy, too, and yet that's exactly what appears to be happening because of a needlessly rigid funding formula set up by the Florida Legislature. Child welfare agencies …

    The Legislature may have had good intentions when it came up with the funding plan, but it’s obvious that there is some unfairness built into it. The funding may be complicated, but the goal is simple: Making sure every child in need gets the help he or she needs.