Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Romano: Why, yes, I'd love to spend millions more on the pier

This is a view of the downtown St. Petersburg skyline and waterfront from over Tampa Bay looking west. The area where the St. Petersburg Pier used to be can be seen at the right, center. SCOTT KEELER   |   Times

This is a view of the downtown St. Petersburg skyline and waterfront from over Tampa Bay looking west. The area where the St. Petersburg Pier used to be can be seen at the right, center. SCOTT KEELER | Times

Well, this is bad news. They've gone and raised the price of spectacular.

Based on the latest construction catalog, a city should expect only a no-frills, starter pier for its initial $46 million investment. Throw in an additional $20 million and you can get a complementary package that links the pier to downtown and creates a super-nice waterfront district.

But if you want truly spectacular?

That might cost you $14 million more.

Which explains why St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Kriseman has been quietly lobbying City Council members and Pinellas County commissioners to shift some available funds from one pocket to another.

"I don't want us to have any regrets down the road," Kriseman said. "I want to be able to give the community something really special."

So how do you feel about this cost increase?

Misled? I'll buy that.

Annoyed? I get that, too.

Ready for battle? Sorry, but I disagree.

As frustrating as the details may be, the mayor's overall point is sound. This is a centerpiece project for a city. Not just a local amenity, but an economic asset. And do you really want to risk cheapening the city's signature landmark by arguing over an arbitrary price tag at the last minute?

To put it another way, saying no is easy.

That's why the conversation about a new pier is still ongoing 12 years after it began. That's why the new police station hasn't been built. That's why a Rays stadium is still a theory.

I'm not saying city leaders shouldn't be prudent, responsible or inquisitive. But there comes a time when you must be bold. When you must be visionary. When you must have courage.

This is one of those moments.

There will be arguments that a waterfront promenade, splash pool, floating dock, kayak and paddleboard station or covered pavilion at the pier are less important than infrastructure needs.

Like an out-of-date sewer system, for example.

But Kriseman says those arguments are misguided. The $14 million he's requesting from the county would come from a fund that cannot be used on any of the city's sewage plants.

"It sounds great to say, 'Let's use this money for this,' but legally we can't do it," Kriseman said. "At the same time, I am absolutely committed to fixing our sewer system, and we've got the funding in place to do that. It will get done."

Just to be clear, the extra pier money could be used to replace aging sewer pipes downtown, but Kriseman says those repairs would cost only $1.5 million. And, he points out, those particular pipes are not high among the problem areas.

If that's the case, I would suggest earmarking $2 million for the downtown pipes and cutting the pier amenities down to $12 million.

It's an easy compromise given the current climate. And it would help ease the perception that the mayor is more interested in shiny things than the nitty-gritty.

In the end, here's what I do know:

If the money is spent and the pier is a spectacular success, no one will be bellyaching about the $14 million in five years.

But if the city cuts corners and the pier has a limited appeal, you can count on hearing complaints for generations to come.

Romano: Why, yes, I'd love to spend millions more on the pier 12/15/16 [Last modified: Thursday, December 15, 2016 6:31am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Pentagon investigating troubling questions after deadly Niger ambush

    Military

    WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary James N. Mattis, troubled by a lack of information two weeks after an ambush on a special operations patrol in Niger left four U.S. soldiers dead, is demanding a timeline of what is known about the attack, as a team of investigators sent to West Africa begins its work.

  2. In the military, trusted officers became alleged assailants in sex crimes

    Military

    The Army is grappling with a resurgence of cases in which troops responsible for preventing sexual assault have been accused of rape and related crimes, undercutting the Pentagon's claims that it is making progress against sexual violence in the ranks.

    Christina Radomski (left) once walked into a print shop to pick up a project for her husband Mike Radomski (right) and saw the bulletin board behind the counter full of thank-you notes her Mike had written. Mike Radomski, 29, died Oct. 12, 2017 in a car accident near his home in Wildwood, Fla.
  3. Trump on his Puerto Rico response: 'I'd say it was a 10'

    Politics

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump gave himself a "10" on Thursday for his response to the widespread devastation Puerto Rico suffered after back-to-back hurricanes created a situation that the island's governor described as "catastrophic" as he met with Trump at the White House.

    Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rossello speaks with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on Thursday.
  4. Editorial: Rubio, Bilirakis owe Floridians answers on drug law

    Editorials

    Sen. Marco Rubio and Rep. Gus Bilirakis of Palm Harbor have some explaining to do. They were co-sponsors of legislation making it harder for the Drug Enforcement Administration to go after drug companies that distribute prescription pills to unscrupulous doctors and pharmacists, contributing to the deadly opioid crisis …

    Rep. Gus Bilirakis of Palm Harbor has some explaining to do. He was a co-sponsor of legislation making it harder for the Drug Enforcement Administration to go after drug companies that distribute prescription pills to unscrupulous doctors and pharmacists.
  5. Former Hillsborough school official files lawsuit alleging high-level corruption

    K12

    TAMPA — The fired human resources chief of the Hillsborough County School District is accusing district leaders and two School Board members of committing corrupt acts and then punishing her when she would not go along.

    Stephanie Woodford rose through the ranks of the Hillsborough County School District, then was fired as Chief of Human Resources on April 28. She's now suing the district, alleging numerous acts of corruption. [EDMUND D. FOUNTAIN | Times]