Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

St. Petersburg's choice: Spend $50 million to keep the Pier or close it and save $1 million a year

ST. PETERSBURG — The city's iconic Pier is on such wobbly financial footing that taxpayers would save $1 million a year by simply closing it, according to a new city analysis.

The analysis creates questions about the city's long-held plans to spend $50 million to rebuild the Pier's deteriorating infrastructure.

Since 2001, the Pier has cost city taxpayers nearly $12 million, budget figures show. Last month, the city further reduced rents for about a dozen struggling tenants who threatened to close.

City officials acknowledge there is no plan to ever break even, let alone turn a profit.

The sobering financial outlook surfaced during a discussion about rebuilding the Pier's quarter-mile-long approach and pier head. The project would not include replacing the Pier building, which opened in 1973. The Pier is owned by the city but managed by a private company.

"In the private sector, nobody would spend $50 million with an operating subsidy (on top of) that," said City Council member Karl Nurse. "Nobody in their right mind would build it. Except the government."

City officials have not decided what to do, and a decision could be years away. Mayor Rick Baker is forming a citizen task force to recommend a course of action.

A 5-year-old engineering study determined that the Pier's approach and base must be rebuilt by 2014. Exposure to saltwater has weakened it, requiring costly maintenance and ongoing repairs. If the $50 million overhaul is approved, work is expected to begin in 2012.

The project would be paid for through a process called tax increment financing, which dedicates city and county property tax dollars for capital projects downtown.

While no one wants the Pier to disappear, economic realities suggest something might have to change. The city faces a possible $20 million budget shortfall next year.

Baker has asked each city department to plan for budget reductions up to 3 percent, and City Council members have discussed switching some employee work schedules from five eight-hour days a week to four 10-hour days.

Despite its cost, some defend the Pier as a treasured piece of city history.

"The Pier is an attraction," said City Council member Leslie Curran. "Love it or hate it, it does draw people not only to St. Petersburg, but Pinellas County."

But the Pier has seen attendance drop by almost half this decade — from nearly 2 million visitors in 2001 to just over 1 million in 2008.

The complex's small retail spaces have made it unattractive to regional and national chains, and uncertainty about the Pier's future make current tenants hesitant to improve their stores.

Negative perceptions of the kitschy shops have kept locals away.

Keeping it open indefinitely would cost taxpayers almost $1.5 million a year, plus the $50 million in needed infrastructure repairs.

Closing and fencing off the Pier would cost about $500,000, according to city officials. Demolishing the Pier and its approach would cost $6 million.

"These are the doomsday scenarios that have to be said," said City Council member Herb Polson. "You could spend $50 million and not see a thing differently. That's hard for the common man to understand."

36 years at the upside-down Pier

1973: Upside-down pyramid structure is built.

1975: "The Laser," an artistic display that featured inch-thick beams of light crisscrossing triangular patterns above the Pier, makes its debut. It's discontinued in 1978 due to technical difficulties.

1978: City enlists additional "foot patrolmen" to stave off drunks and other undesirables. The Pier is renamed "Pier Place."

1983: Double-decker bus service arrives, along with new laser lights.

1986: The Pier is closed for an $11 million renovation.

1987: A new $187,000 outdoor lighting system debuts.

1989: A nighttime curfew is enacted after a 16-year-old girl is shot and killed near the Pier. She and a group of friends were being escorted away by security guards when a friend of the girl's fired at a guard, but shot the girl instead.

2006: City officials announce plans for a major $50 million restoration.

St. Petersburg's choice: Spend $50 million to keep the Pier or close it and save $1 million a year 02/27/09 [Last modified: Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:28pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Police: Uber driver's gun discharges during fight at Adventure Island in Tampa

    Public Safety

    TAMPA — An Uber driver's gun went off Sunday at Adventure Island during a fight between the driver and two passengers.

  2. Baker cautious on Pride politics


    Rick and Joyce Baker strode down Central Avenue Sunday amid rainbow flags, corporate booths, and blaring music of the St. Pete Pride Festival.

    St. Petersburg mayoral candidate Rick Baker chats Sunday with people at the St. Pete Pride Festival. As mayor, Baker did not sign a Pride parade proclamation, but now he says he would.
  3. Rays' bullpen stars lit up in loss to Orioles

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — Saturday it was the soft underbelly of the bullpen that let one get away from the Rays, incurring the wrath of the team's faithful followers, who wondered why the high-leverage guys weren't pitching.

    Rays closer Alex Colome, coming in with the score tied in the ninth, allows three runs in his second straight poor outing.
  4. Lightning among early suitors for defenseman Kevin Shattenkirk

    Lightning Strikes

    TAMPA — Lightning general manager Steve Yzerman said he planned to explore free agency for potential needs, which include bolstering his blue line and adding a wing or two.

    Defenseman Kevin Shattenkirk, who can be a free agent Saturday, counts the Lightning among his early suitors.
  5. Senate leaders try to appease members as support for health bill slips


    WASHINGTON — Senate Republican leaders scrambled Sunday to rally support for their health care bill, even as opposition continued to build outside Congress and two Republican senators questioned whether the bill would be approved this week.

    Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill on Thursday, is one of the five Republican senators who announced they cannot support the health care bill as drafted.