Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Stop the Lens wants to be clear: it's not

Stop the Lens by Concerned Citizens seeks an ordinance to kill the Lens contract. It wants voters to know it’s not

DIRK SHADD | Times (2012)

Stop the Lens by Concerned Citizens seeks an ordinance to kill the Lens contract. It wants voters to know it’s not

ST. PETERSBURG — The men behind the second of two petitions targeting the city's Pier project are straining to distinguish themselves from the other guys — even as they share a common goal.

First, they're not the ones with the lawsuit. And the upside-down pyramid that thousands of St. Petersburg residents say they want to save? That's not their battle.

Talk to leaders of Concerned Citizens of St. Petersburg and they'll firmly declare that their focus is on blocking plans for the Lens, the controversial, would-be replacement of the inverted pyramid.

Further, they'll tell you, the Lens, with its showy double bridges and vaulting crown, is out of place on the waters that lap their beloved St. Petersburg, where they have sailed for decades.

Why is the distinction important?

The problem is, while Concerned Citizens is trying to galvanize the masses to sign its petition to "Stop the Lens," 15,652 people have already committed to an earlier Pier petition that has been in the news for a lawsuit that attempted to drag every one of the signers — many unwillingly —- into a court battle.

The fear, said Bud Risser of Concerned Citizens, is that residents will pair the petition with the lawsuit and run for cover. So, the group, with its iconic red circle crossing out an image of the Lens, is about to kick off an ad campaign to clear up misconceptions.

"We want that ad out there to eliminate the confusion, to remind people of the fact that this is all about having a vote on what goes on the waterfront," said William Ballard, president of Concerned Citizens.

Perhaps more important, the organization wants to relay the message that its anti-Lens petition has a good chance of success.

The earlier effort, spearheaded by the group, failed to get the City Council to put a question on the ballot, which led to the lawsuit.

Whereas the petition ran into snags, even city officials concede that Concerned Citizens is on the right track. As part of its painstaking mobilization, the anti-Lens group hired a lawyer versed in municipal law to make sure that if they collect the required number of signatures, City Council members will have no choice but to put their Pier question to the vote.

City Attorney John Wolfe had advised the council that it had no legal obligation to hold a referendum in voteonthepier's case. The city's charter, Wolfe said, addresses petitions only for a proposed ordinance or repeal of an ordinance, and state law refers to petitions only in relation to changing a charter.

Concerned Citizens' petition proposes an ordinance that would terminate the city's contract with Michael Maltzan Architecture, designers of the Lens.

"If the Stop the Lens group gets sufficient signatures, the council will then have to consider the ordinance they have proposed," Chief assistant city attorney Mark Winn said.

That would mean either choosing to adopt the ordinance or committing it to a public vote.

Meanwhile, the anti-Lens group is attempting to gather the required petitions. It has lined up locations, including UPS stores, Gold's Gym, Rent-a-Centers, a couple of liquor stores and its own office at 944 Fourth St. N, for people to sign petitions available at those sites or received by mail.

The group is revising its direct-mail piece to try to "enhance the returns," Risser said.

"Our test mailing suggested to us that people were confused by the two petitions and that fear of becoming involved in a lawsuit was probably keeping people from signing our petition," Ballard said.

"We realized we really have to get our message out."

But for diehard opponents in both groups against the city's plan for a new $50 million Pier, that message is inconsequential.

"We do have one thing in common," Risser said.

"All we want is a vote. You can vote on saving the Pier, or you can vote on stopping the Lens. If they had chosen a design that had captured the emotions of St. Petersburg, it would have been a done deal."

Waveney Ann Moore can be reached at [email protected] or (727) 892-2283.

fast facts

Pier schedule

May 31: Closing

Late summer: Demolition

Early 2014: Construction begins

Mid 2015: Lens opens

Stop the Lens wants to be clear: it's not 01/19/13 [Last modified: Friday, January 18, 2013 7:22pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. After Hurricane Irma, Tampa Bay officers headed south to help out

    Public Safety

    When Hurricane Irma was forecast to pummel the Tampa Bay region, Tampa police Cpl. Whitney McCormick was ready for the worst — to lose her home and all of her possessions.

    Tampa International Airport Police Department Sgt. Eric Diaz (left) stands next to Tampa Police Department Cpl. Whitney McCormick at the Collier County Command Post in the days after Hurricane Irma. More than 100 local law enforcement officers traveled from Tampa Bay to help out the county. (Courtesy of Whitney McCormick)
  2. Forecast: Sunny skies, mainly dry conditions continue across Tampa Bay


    For Tampa Bay residents, Wednesday is expected to bring lots of sunshine, lower humidity and little to no storm chances.

    Tampa Bay's 7 day forecast. [WTSP]
  3. Florida education news: Irma makeup days, HB 7069, charter schools and more


    MAKEUP DAYS: Florida education commissioner Pam Stewart waives two of the required 180 days of instruction to help districts complete the …

    Education Commissioner Pam Stewart
  4. Rays morning after: At least Archer looked good



  5. Financially strapped Brooksville raises tax rate and fire fees

    Local Government

    BROOKSVILLE — After conducting an intensive examination of the city's financial position over the past couple of months, the Brooksville City Council has settled on its 2017-18 budget and a tax increase and fire fee increase to help pay for it.

    City Council member Joe Bernardini voted against the budget and the tax rate increase, saying it contained no employee raises and almost no capital expenses.