Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Tampa council disappoints cell tower opponents

TAMPA — Homeowners who oppose the proliferation of cell towers in their neighborhoods failed to persuade the City Council on Thursday to give them a voice in where the towers are placed.

City code now allows cell towers on school property, city land, utility easements and other locations with no public notice as long as they meet certain height and distance requirements.

"We aren't asking you to restrict them. We're only asking you to have a public hearing," said Carrie Grimail, who lives near a South Tampa school where a cell tower was proposed.

The principal of Coleman Middle School abandoned the plan after a public outcry. But Grimail said she wouldn't have even known about it if not for community activists.

"I was notified about the tower by a woman who came to my door with a petition," she said.

But an attorney for Collier Enterprises II, a company that has helped negotiate deals between cell phone providers and public schools, warned against revisiting the city's 10-year-old rules on cell phone towers. Those rules came about after significant input from residents, attorney Jim Porter said.

The ordinance may already go further than state and federal laws allow, and unraveling it could make it less effective, he added.

Federal law prohibits local governments from regulating the construction of cell phone towers due to concerns about potential health threats. Florida law says local governments can't make decisions about placement that would limit a company's ability to provide cell phone service.

But local governments can consider land use and zoning, aesthetics and safety when considering where to allow the towers, according to assistant city attorney Julie Cole.

The Hillsborough County Commission, at the request of cell phone tower opponents, agreed in February to require public hearings before issuing permits for the towers.

Council member John Dingfelder initially backed the idea of following suit in the city.

"There's no protection at all when anybody wants to put these up in parks, on public property or utilities' property," he said. "We should include a public hearing process for any tower that's going up in this city."

Council member Mary Mulhern suggested creating a task force to review the city's regulations.

Dingfelder and council member Linda Saul-Sena supported that idea, but the three did not get the fourth vote needed to set up the task force.

Council member Charlie Miranda said he believes driving while sending text messages on a cell phone is more deadly than the towers that carry their signals. Those who objected to the tower at Coleman Middle School should celebrate their victory and move on, he added.

The 10-year-old rule, council member Gwen Miller said, was hashed out with a significant public input and only a handful of people have a problem with it now.

"This has been working. I don't see anything wrong with it," she said.

Instead, the council voted unanimously in favor of Chairman Tom Scott's suggestion to send a letter to School Board members asking them to adopt formal rules that would require public discussion before installing a cell phone tower on school property.

That means the city could still install cell phone towers on its land with no public notice.

Tower opponents left Thursday's meeting disappointed.

"They took the easy way out," said Bill Cook. "I don't know what they're afraid of."

Janet Zink can be reached at or (813) 226-3401.

Tampa council disappoints cell tower opponents 08/27/09 [Last modified: Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:42pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Chris Archer knocked out early as Rays lose to Orioles (w/video)

    The Heater

    BALTIMORE — Another short outing by Chris Archer led to another long afternoon for the Rays in a 9-4 loss to the Orioles on Sunday.

  2. Bucs-Vikings report card: Where's this explosive offense we heard about all offseason?


    O NO

    True, the Bucs defense looked pretty leaky in the 34-17 loss to the Vikings. But you know what needs to happen when the defense is getting torched? The offense needs to step up. In games such as these, with defensive players seemingly getting hurt every play, the offense needs to outscore the other …

    Minnesota Vikings cornerback Trae Waynes (26) intercepts a Jameis Winston pass intended for wide receiver DeSean Jackson (11) during the first half. [LOREN ELLIOTT   |   Times]
  3. Bucs-Vikings: Instant analysis from Tampa Bay's 34-17 loss


    MINNEAPOLIS — Here's Rick Stroud and Tom Jones' instant analysis from the Bucs' 34-17 loss at Minnesota Sunday. More to come from Rick & Tom — and Greg Auman —- from Minneapolis later today.

    Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Jarius Wright (17) dives over the pylon for a touchdown as  Bucs cornerback Ryan Smith (29) defends. [LOREN ELLIOTT   |   Times]
  4. Worst-Case scenario: Case Keenum, Vikings hand Bucs 34-17 loss


    MINNEAPOLIS — With key defensive starters out with injury, the Bucs were dominated by the Minnesota Vikings on Sunday, with fill-in quarterback Case Keenum beating Tampa Bay for the third year in a row, …

    Bucs quarterback Jameis Winston (3) is sacked by Minnesota Vikings defensive end Everson Griffen (97) during the first half. [LOREN ELLIOTT   |   Times]
  5. Officials: 1 dead, 7 victims hurt in Tennessee church shooting


    NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A masked gunman entered a church in Tennessee on Sunday and opened fire, killing at least one person and injuring seven others before apparently shooting himself, an official said.