Marine Corps can't find records of critical tests

Some soil at Camp Lejeune, N.C., was so saturated with fuel and chemicals by the late 1980s, the Marine Corps knew it was critical to test the air in nearby buildings for carcinogens.

"We want to be sure that there are no compounds present inside the work spaces in these buildings — which could have a long-term chronic adverse health effect on occupants," base environmental engineer Bob Alexander told the public in 1988.

Testing, he said, would begin "in the very near future."

But nothing in the vast collection of public records detailing one of the nation's worst contamination sites shows the Marine Corps kept that promise.

The only indoor air quality testing reflected in records occurred a decade or more later. And by then, fuel odors were so bad that five buildings would be demolished.

After weeks of searching their files, Corps officials acknowledged to the St. Petersburg Times that they could find no documentation that testing was completed before the late 1990s.

But Marine spokesman Nat Fahy said testing may nonetheless have occurred. Records, he said, may have simply been destroyed pursuant to the Marines' document-retention guidelines.

Fahy did not respond when asked if the Corps could say independent of any record if those tests were completed.

"The absence of records more than 20 years later does not necessarily mean action was not taken," he said in an e-mail.

The Corps "takes vapor intrusion seriously and has taken . . . steps to ensure the safety of those who live and work at Camp Lejeune. We believe that any testing that may have been done was done in a timely manner."

Mildred Duncan, 62, a retired civilian computer specialist at Camp Lejeune, worked in a building in the 1980s evacuated several times due to fuel odors.

"This is a betrayal," Duncan said. "It's like they lied to us. They kept us in those buildings, breathing all that. It's not right."

Fuel and chemical fumes are one of the topics federal scientists expect to examine as they determine if up to 1 million Marines and civilian employees exposed to contaminants in water and air at Camp Lejeune suffered adverse health effects.

People who may have been exposed over a 30-year period come from every state in the nation. About 170,000 people who lived or worked on the base have signed up for a registry to get updates of research.

Some 14,500 are from Florida, the second-highest total in the nation behind North Carolina.

Contaminated drinking water is the focus of current research and undoubtedly exposed far more people than air.

But tens of thousands of Marines and civilians undoubtedly worked or passed through perhaps a dozen or more buildings near sites of contamination, Marine critics say.

These buildings included warehouses, maintenance shops and a data processing center.

They were all near vast underground plumes of solvents and fuel, including gasoline that leaked from Lejeune's Hadnot Point fuel depot, which closed in 1991 after 50 years of operation.

The depot's corroded tanks and pipes may have leaked more than 1 million gallons of fuel, records show. Fuel is still being pumped out of the ground today.

"It's unfathomable why they wouldn't have done the testing after committing to do it," said Richard Clapp, a professor emeritus of environmental health at Boston University who has worked extensively on Lejeune pollution issues.

Inhaled pollutants can be especially dangerous because they are absorbed by the body more quickly than water, he said.

• • •

The extent of fuel leakage at Hadnot Point came into sharp focus in the late 1980s when engineers discovered an underground layer of pure gasoline 15-feet thick.

In May 1988, a private contractor, Environmental Science and Engineering, finished a study with recommendations on how the Corps and Navy could clean up the contamination.

The report wasn't just about leaking fuel, though the largest source of pollution at Hadnot Point was gasoline.

ESE recommended five measures to protect public health, including air monitoring in about a dozen buildings.

"In the event of compounds being detected above the threshold limit . . . acceptable to humans, immediate measures, such as forced ventilation, should be taken to reduce health risks" until permanent measures could be taken, ESE's report said.

Camp Lejeune officials didn't raise any objection.

Indoor air testing was discussed at an Aug. 9, 1988, public meeting of base officials and environmental regulators, a transcript shows. The Corps made it clear: Testing would occur.

"We believe in maximum disclosure, minimum delay," Marine Maj. Stewart Wagner said at the meeting.

But plans hit a snag.

It was soon clear that proposed testing "exceeded the capabilities" of industrial hygiene staff at the base who were assigned to do it, said an Oct. 5, 1988, memo by Lejeune's commander.

He suggested hiring a private company. The Times asked the Corps if it could locate a contract to show if this was done.

Once again, a Corps spokesman said such a contract could not be found and noted the absence of a contract did not mean one did not once exist.

"It's the 'the dog ate my homework' excuse," said former Marine drill instructor Jerry Ensminger, whose 9-year-old daughter died of leukemia he thinks is linked to Lejeune pollution.

Were personnel at the base pressing the command about the odor of fuel?

The Corps said it could not find a record of complaints on fuel smells. But records and interviews show that complaints were, in fact, being generated.

OHM Remediation Services Corp., a contractor helping in the cleanup of Hadnot Point, noted in a 2001 PowerPoint presentation that fuel odors in Building 1101 had been "reported for years" before 1997.

Roy Bell, a retired Lejeune firefighter, said the odors could be overpowering and that workers in buildings near the fuel depot had long complained.

"There were lots of fumes," Bell said. "We would get calls that people smelled gasoline."

Bell said firefighters initially knew nothing about the extent of spillage at the fuel depot. In 1999 — eight years after the depot was closed — fumes became a critical problem.

Complaints mounted. Navy records show a series of complaints in the spring at Building 1101, just a few hundred feet from the fuel depot. On Dec. 10, 1999, workers were evacuated.

Testing commenced and the Corps and Navy implemented plans to prevent fumes from entering numerous buildings.

But despite extensive efforts, problems persisted. In late 2006, fuel fumes again led to the evacuation of 1101. Eventually, that building was converted from office space to a warehouse so workers would not be exposed. Five other buildings were razed.

All this and much more is detailed in a veritable mountain of paperwork about Camp Lejeune pollution.

The Corps said it follows Navy guidelines on how long it keeps records, and documents from the 1980s would not be saved for decades.

If true, it's a policy that is not uniformly executed.

Hundreds, if not thousands of documents from the same period have not been destroyed by the Corps and are available.

One such document is a July 15, 1988, memo by the Corps' commandant recapping requirements under the federal Superfund law for sites like Lejeune with hazardous substances.

That memo said Superfund records must be kept 50 years — a rule the Corps said did not apply in this case.

The memo notes: "It is unlawful to destroy, mutilate, conceal, or falsify such records."

Asked exactly what the Corps' policy is on records retention, a reporter was given a Web link to the current 473-page Navy manual on records management.

In that manual under the heading "Hazardous Substance Records" is this:

"Destroy when 50 years old."

William R, Levesque can be reached at levesque@sptimes.com.

Health survey

The federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry will conduct a health survey starting in June of people who lived or worked at Camp Lejeune, N.C., before 1986 who may have been exposed to pollutants. To participate, or to get more information, visit www.cdc.gov/mmwr.

Marine Corps can't find records of critical tests 05/20/11 [Last modified: Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:20pm]

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...