Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Vets' spouses lose a death benefit by staying single

Nona Chubboy's husband, an officer in the Navy, paid the premiums on a government insurance policy for years, expecting it to help his wife if he died.

Her husband, Louis, died of cancer linked to military atomic testing. But the only way Chubboy can collect the benefit is to do something she finds disloyal to her spouse's memory.

The Tierra Verde woman would have to remarry.

In a seemingly absurd quirk of federal laws on death benefits, up to 54,000 military widows and widowers around the nation are losing up to $13,000 a year in death benefits unless they take another walk down the aisle after age 57.

A federal appeals court in a recent decision made note of the unusual condition, saying, "Perhaps Congress intended to encourage marriage for older surviving spouses."

To Chubboy, 80, whose husband died in 1981 at age 54, Uncle Sam is punishing her for standing by her man.

"You love your husband and you are a dutiful wife to him," she said. "Now they're saying to go out and find a new one if you want this money. But I don't want another man. I found the best of the litter."

Lawyers who represented the Department of Defense in a case in which military widows sought lost benefits declined to comment. And a representative of the Department of Veterans Affairs with knowledge of the benefit quirk could not be reached.

But in court papers, government lawyers say they are simply following the law, though they, too, have told an appeals court that the marriage rule is "an absurd result."

Veterans advocates say the government is treating surviving spouses who don't remarry unfairly.

"It's pretty bizarre," said Vivianne Wersel, chairwoman of the governmental relations committee of the Gold Star Wives of America Inc. "It's unethical and immoral that we're forced to have to choose another man to receive what our spouses worked so hard for."

The history of this odd provision of federal law gets a little complicated.

The dispute involves monthly payments from two government programs that pay benefits to the surviving spouses or children of veterans: the Survivor Benefit Plan and the Dependency and Indemnity Compensation program.

The DIC is administered by the VA and pays the spouse of a veteran who dies on active duty or of a service-connected illness or injury after retirement from the military. The SBP, administered by the Pentagon, is akin to a life insurance annuity paid to the spouse or children of active-duty troops or veterans who die for any reason.

Active-duty troops are automatically covered by SBP. But when they retire, they must opt to stay in the program and pay premiums.

The government, however, has long barred spouses from collecting both benefits at the same time, regardless of age or marital status. So Uncle Sam subtracts whatever a spouse was owed under the DIC from the payment owed under the SBP — a loss of $1,154 a month for most spouses.

Here's where it gets even more confusing.

Congress passed a law in 2003 that said the surviving spouses of veterans could collect both SBP and DIC at the same time. But there was one condition: Spouses could only do so if they remarried after age 57.

Congress was trying to fix an unrelated problem: DIC payments stopped if a spouse remarried.

The bottom line: The only way to get both benefits is to find a new spouse after your 57th birthday.

If a veteran's children are designated as beneficiaries in the SBP program, a spouse can get around the provision. Then the monthly payment would be made to the children via the surviving spouse. And the spouse could still get DIC money.

But when the kids turn 18, the payments would stop.

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., has worked for several years to repeal the ban on the simultaneous receipt of SBP and DIC benefits for all surviving spouses, regardless of their age or marital status.

"They're two separate benefits," Nelson said in an interview last week. "Why should they offset one another? You can't make an argument for that with a straight face."

Nelson, however, said the problem is funding, which is why his efforts to repeal the offset have been defeated in previous years. One estimate said the 10-year cost of a complete repeal would be $7 billion.

"We'll try again next year," he said.

Critics say that veterans would never have signed up for the SBP insurance program if they had known.

Freda Schroeppel, 73, of Brooksville, said she attended her husband's benefits briefing before he retired from the Air Force after 35 years in 1975. She said nobody told them both benefits could not be collected at the same time.

Her husband died in 2003 of a service-connected illness, and sure enough, Schroeppel said, the government deducts $1,154 from the check it sends her every month.

"Nobody should have to get married to collect a benefit they deserve," she said. "The insurance was bought and paid for."

William R. Levesque can be reached at [email protected] or (813) 226-3432.

Vets' spouses lose a death benefit by staying single 11/14/09 [Last modified: Saturday, November 14, 2009 8:28pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Astros rout Yankees to force Game 7 of AL Championship Series


    HOUSTON — Justin Verlander pitched seven shutout innings to outduel Luis Severino for the second time, and the Astros bats came alive in their return home as Houston routed the Yankees 7-1 Friday night and forced a decisive Game 7 in the American League Championship Series.

    The Astros’ Brian McCann, who has struggled during the ALCS, breaks a scoreless tie with an RBI double during the fifth inning off Yankees starter Luis Severino.
  2. Review: Faith Hill and Tim McGraw shower love, star power on Tampa's Amalie Arena


    Near the end of their potent new duet Break First, Tim McGraw stopped singing, and let Faith Hill's powerhouse voice take over.

    Faith Hill and Tim McGraw performed at Amalie Arena in Tampa on Oct. 20, 2017.
  3. Senate to take up AUMF debate as Trump defends reaction to Niger attack


    WASHINGTON — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is taking up a long-awaited debate about authorizing military force against the Islamic State as President Trump comes under unprecedented public scrutiny for his treatment of dead soldiers' families, following an ambush on troops helping to fight Islamic …

  4. In fear and vigilance, a Tampa neighborhood holds its breath


    TAMPA — There was a time, not long ago, when Wayne Capaz would go for a stroll at night and Christina Rodriguez would shop whenever she wanted. Michael Fuller would go to his night job as a line cook, not too worried about his wife at home.

    More than 50 people gathered and walked in the Southeast Seminole Heights community Friday to pay respects to the victims of three shootings. The crowd took a moment of silence at the corner of 11th Street and East New Orleans where Monica Hoffa was found dead. [JONATHAN CAPRIEL  |  Times]