Scattered Clouds66° FULL FORECASTScattered Clouds66° FULL FORECAST
Make us your home page
Instagram

Obama says threat of military strike stays on table

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said in a nationally televised address Tuesday night that recent diplomatic steps offer "the potential to remove the threat of chemical weapons" inside Syria without the use of force, but he also insisted the U.S. military will keep the pressure on President Bashar Assad "and be ready to respond" if other measures fail.

Speaking from the East Room of the White House, Obama said he had asked congressional leaders to postpone a vote on legislation he has been seeking to authorize the use of military force against Syria.

Acknowledging the weariness the nation feels after a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama said: "America is not the world's policeman."

And yet, he added, "When with modest effort and risk we can stop children from being gassed to death and thereby make our own children safer over the long run, I believe we should act. That's what makes America different. That's what makes us exceptional."

"Our ideals and principles, as well as our national security, are at stake in Syria," he declared.

The speech capped a frenzied 10-day stretch of events that began when he unexpectedly announced he was stepping back from a threatened military strike and first asking Congress to pass legislation authorizing the use of force against Assad.

With public opinion polls consistently showing widespread opposition to American military intervention, the White House has struggled mightily to generate support among lawmakers — liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans alike — who have expressed fears of involvement in yet another war in the Middle East and have questioned whether U.S. national security interests were at stake in Syria. Obama had trouble, as well, building international support for a military attack designed to degrade Assad's military.

Suddenly, though, events took another unexpected turn this week. First Russia and then Syria reacted positively to a seemingly off-hand remark from Secretary of State John Kerry indicating that the crisis could be defused if Damascus agreed to put its chemical weapons under international control.

Obama said he was sending Kerry to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Thursday, and added that "I will continue my own discussion" with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

At the same time, he said, the United States and its allies would work with Russia and China to present a resolution to the U.N. Security Council "requiring Assad to give up his chemical weapons and to ultimately destroy them under international control."

In a speech that lasted 16 minutes, Obama recounted the events of the deadly chemical weapons attack on Aug. 21 that the United States blames on Assad and that U.S. officials say killed more than 1,400, including at least 400 children. "When dictators commit atrocities, they depend upon the world to look the other way until these horrifying pictures fade from memory. But these things happened. The facts cannot be denied," he said.

Assad has said the attack was launched by rebels.

Obama said firmly that Assad's alleged attack was "not only a violation of international law, it's also a danger to our security."

If diplomacy now fails and the United States fails to act, he said, "the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using chemical weapons" and "other tyrants will have no reason to think twice about acquiring poison gas and using" it. Over time, he added, U.S. troops could face the threat of chemical warfare, and if fighting escapes Syria's border, "these weapons could threaten allies like Turkey, Jordan and Israel."

The president sought to deal methodically with what he said were questions asked by lawmakers and citizens who took the time to write him with their concerns about U.S. military action.

"I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria," he promised. "I will not pursue an open-ended action like Iraq or Afghanistan. I will not pursue a prolonged air campaign like Libya or Kosovo. This would be a targeted strike to achieve a clear objective: deterring the use of chemical weapons and degrading Assad's capabilities."

As for a diplomatic solution, Obama "wasn't overly optimistic about" prospects for a solution at the United Nations, said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democrat, after his party's rank and file met privately for lunch in the Capitol with the president. He quoted Obama as saying that even if a credible plan could be worked out, it could be difficult to push through the Security Council. And, indeed, Putin said such a U.N. effort could work only if "the American side and those who support the U.S.A., in this sense, reject the use of force."

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said Tuesday that his government was ready to turn over its chemical stockpile in line with Russia's proposal in order "to thwart U.S. aggression." He also said Syria was prepared to sign an international chemical convention it has long rejected.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell became the first congressional leader to come out against legislation giving the president authority for limited strikes. "There are just too many unanswered questions about our long-term strategy in Syria," he said.

By contrast, Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia, the top two Republicans in the House, have endorsed Obama's request.

President Barack Obama addresses the nation Tuesday in a live speech from the White House.

Associated Press

President Barack Obama addresses the nation Tuesday in a live speech from the White House.

Reactions

to the president

"Launching a strike in the Middle East with no clear military objective could very well make a bad situation worse. The last thing we want to do is incite further chaos in a part of the world that is already on the brink."

Rep. Vern Buchanan,

R-Sarasota

It is the threat of military force that has brought Assad to the point of considering international control of his chemical weapons. What Congress should do now is authorize the president's request of a limited strike. Assad should be warned that if he does not turn the chemical weapons over to international custody in the next three weeks, then the president is authorized to strike."

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla.

"It is only now, faced with the threat of U.S. military action, that Russia has suddenly expressed any interest addressing the crisis in Syria through peaceful means."

Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Boca Raton

"Again, after 2night, classified briefings & committee hearings, the admin has failed to present a clear & compelling case 4 US intervention. I will vote NO #Syria."

Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fort Myers, via Twitter

"There are few good options here. But elevating a civil war into an international event should not be one of them.''

Rep. Tom Rooney,

R-Okeechobee

"The president's address to the nation tonight proved that his administration's diplomacy lacks focus and is wholly incapable of articulating what success would look like in Syria.''

Rep. Steve Southerland,

R-Panama City

"The use of chemical weapons merits a strong U.S. military response that will act as a deterrent for other rogue regimes such as Iran and North Korea. . . . The Geneva Convention should not be interpreted as allowing a 'free first use of gas.' ''

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen,

R-Miami

"My position remains unchanged. U.S. military intervention is not the right course in Syria. I have long said that the president should have pursued these peaceful negotiations with Russia 18 months ago.''

Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Lakeland

Obama says threat of military strike stays on table 09/10/13 [Last modified: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:28pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...