Thursday, January 18, 2018

Baby picture of the universe

The universe is a wee bit older than we thought. Not only that, but turns out the ingredients are a little bit different, too. And not only that, but the way they're mixed isn't quite what we expected, either. And not only that, but there are hints and whispers of something much grander going on as well.

So what's going on?

The European Space Agency's Planck mission is what's going on. Planck has been scanning the entire sky, over and over, peering at the radio and microwaves pouring out of the universe. Some of this light comes from stars, some from cold clumps of dust, some from exploding stars and galaxies. But a portion of it comes from farther away … much farther away. Billions of light years, in fact, all the way from the edge of the observable universe.

This light was first emitted when the universe was very young, about 380,000 years old. It was blindingly bright, but in its eons-long travel to us has dimmed and reddened. Fighting the expansion of the universe itself, the light has had its wavelength stretched out until it gets to us in the form of microwaves. Planck gathered that light for over 15 months, using instruments far more sensitive than ever before.

The light from the early universe shows it's not smooth. If you crank the contrast way up you see slightly brighter and slightly dimmer spots. These correspond to changes in temperature of the universe on a scale of 1 part in 100,000. That's incredibly small, but has profound implications.

We think those fluctuations were imprinted on the universe when it was only a trillionth of a trillionth of a second old, and they grew with the universe as it expanded. They were also the seeds of the galaxies and the clusters and galaxies we see today.

What started out as quantum fluctuations when the universe was smaller than a proton have now grown to be the largest structures in the cosmos, hundreds of millions of light years across.

Let that settle in your brain a moment.

And those fluctuations are the key to Planck's observations. By looking at those small changes in light we can find out a lot about the universe. Scientists spent years looking at the Planck data, analyzing it. And what they found is pretty amazing:

• The universe is 13.82 billion years old.

• The universe is expanding a bit slower than we expected.

• The universe is 4.9 percent normal matter, 26.8 percent dark matter, and 68.3 percent dark energy.

• The universe is lopsided. Just a bit, just a hint, but that has profound implications.

What does all this mean? Let's take a quick look, one at a time, at these results.

The universe is 13.82 billion years old.

The age of the universe is a little bit higher than we expected. Planck's measurements will become the new benchmark for astronomers.

The universe is expanding a bit slower than we expected.

The universe is expanding, and has been ever since the moment it was born. The farther away you go, the faster the universe expands.

The universe is 4.9 percent normal matter, 26.8 percent dark matter, and 68.3 percent dark energy.

I love this bit. The amount of the fluctuations in the light from the early universe as well as how they are distributed can be used to figure out what the universe is made of. The ingredients and amounts of the universal constituents are:

• 4.9 percent normal matter

• 26.8 percent dark matter

• 68.3 percent dark energy

Normal matter is what we call protons, neutrons, electrons; basically everything you see when you look around. Stars, cashews, dryer lint and books are all made of normal matter. So are you. (Fun fact: People are 93 percent stardust by mass.)

Dark matter is a substance we know exists, but it's invisible. We see its effects through its gravity, which profoundly alters how galaxies rotate and clusters of galaxies behave. There's more than five times as much of it as there is normal matter.

Dark energy was only discovered in 1998. It's very mysterious, but acts like a pressure, increasing the expansion rate of the universe. We know very little about it other than the fact that it exists, and it's a bigger component of the universal budget than normal and dark matter combined.

The best estimates for these numbers before Planck were a bit different: 4.6, 24, and 71.4 percent, respectively. That's neat: There's less dark energy than we thought, so the universe is made up a little bit less of that weird stuff, if that makes you feel better. But there's still a lot of it!

The good news is that having better numbers for all these means astronomers can tune their models a little bit better, and we can understand things a little better. Different models of how the universe behaves predict different ratios for these ingredients, so getting them focused a bit better means we can see which models work better. We're learning!

The universe is lopsided. Just a bit, just a hint, but that has profound implications.

Of all the results announced so far, this may be the most provocative. We expect the universe to be pretty smooth on large scales. Those early fluctuations should be random, so when you look around at this ancient light, the pattern should be pretty random.

And it is! The distribution of the fluctuations is quite random. It may look to your eye to have patterns, but our brains are miserable at seeing true randomness; we impose order on it. You have to use computers, math, and statistics to measure the distribution to test for true randomness, and the universe passes the test.

Kind of. The distribution is random, but the amplitudes of the fluctuations are not. Amplitude is how bright they are; like the height of a wave. It's hard to see by eye, but in the big map made by Planck, the fluctuations are a wee bit brighter than they should be on one side, and a wee bit dimmer on the other. It's an incredibly small effect, but appears to be real.

A simple model of the universe says that shouldn't happen. The universe is lopsided on a vast scale! What can this mean?

Right now, we don't know, and there are far more ideas for why this would happen than we have data to test for. It could mean dark energy is changing over time, for example.

Another idea, and one that is terribly exciting, is that we're seeing some pattern imprinted on the universe from before the Big Bang. I know, that sounds crazy, but it's not completely crazy.

We may be seeing something so big in extent it's happening over scales we literally cannot see. It's like having a house built on a slight incline. Standing in one room you might not notice it, but measuring the elevation in a room on one side of the house versus one all the way on the other side might show the discrepancy. And even then, it only gives you a taste of how big that hill might be.

We're seeing that on a cosmic scale. The universe itself appears to be slightly canted, and we only get a hint of it when we take the measure of the entire universe.

I am entirely and thoroughly delighted by these new results.

As a scientist, of course, I like it when we get better measurements, more detail, refined numbers. That's how we test models, and it helps us understand our ideas better.

But I'm human, and a big part of my brain is still reeling from the fact that we can accurately measure the age of the universe at all. We can figure out what's in it, even when most of it is something we cannot see. We can determine not only that it's expanding, but how quickly.

And best of all, we see that the universe is doing things we still don't understand. It's showing us that there is still more out there, things occurring on so vast a canvas that it both crushes utterly our sense of scale and expands ferociously our imagination.

Every day, we get better at learning what the universe is doing. And the work continues to find out how. It may even lead us to the answer of the ultimate question of all: Why?

If that answer exists (if the question even makes sense), and we can understand it, then we are making our first steps toward it right now.

I still hear some people say that science takes the wonder out of life. Those people are utterly and completely wrong.

Science takes us to the wonder.

Phil Plait is an astronomer, lecturer and author. He worked for 10 years on Hubble Space Telescope data and has written two books, "Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Astrology to the Moon Landing 'Hoax' " and "Death from the Skies! These Are the Ways the universe Will End."

© 2013 Slate


By the numbers, a story of the federal worker and the size of government

Politicians have often painted the federal workforce as a drag on the budget and burden for the taxpayer. Look no further than President Ronald Reagan, who famously said, "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ĎIím from the gove...
Updated: 1 hour ago
PolitiFact: How trustworthy are the polls, more than a year after the 2016 election?

PolitiFact: How trustworthy are the polls, more than a year after the 2016 election?

Over the past year, political professionals have been picking over the pre-election polling data to figure out whether the polls failed to predict Donald Trumpís upset victory over Hillary Clinton.In many peopleís minds, the polls were flat wrong in ...
Published: 01/09/18
Updated: 01/11/18

Five interesting facts

2 hoursis how long the power was out last week for the CES, the consumer electronics show, in the Central Hall of the Las Vegas Convention Center. The biggest electronics show of the year couldnít do much without a key ingredient: electricity. The ca...
Published: 01/08/18
Updated: 01/12/18
Perspective: Two dying memoirists wrote best-sellers about their final days. Then their spouses fell in love.

Perspective: Two dying memoirists wrote best-sellers about their final days. Then their spouses fell in love.

By Nora KrugSAN MATEO, Calif. ó The literary pairing was inevitable.When Breath Becomes Air, Paul Kalanithiís memoir of his final years as he faced lung cancer at age 37, was published posthumously, in 2016, to critical acclaim and commercial success...
Published: 01/08/18
Updated: 01/12/18

Perspective: Why do we get so itchy when we canít use our smartphones?

Americans spend a lot of time on their smartphones. But what can we learn about the connected state of mind by observing what happens when we canít use our devices?While much has been written about the effects of using our phones, from worries about ...
Published: 01/08/18
Updated: 01/11/18
Perspective: Oprah, donít do it

Perspective: Oprah, donít do it

PARIS ó I miss a lot of must-see TV on this side of the Atlantic. But by the time Iíd dropped off my daughter at school Monday morning, it was impossible not to notice how many people in my social media feeds felt something politically significant ha...
Published: 01/08/18
Updated: 01/11/18
Perspective: The systematic crushing of a #MeToo pioneer

Perspective: The systematic crushing of a #MeToo pioneer

Eight decades ago, Patricia Douglas made nationwide headlines, upstaging even the wedding of the former king of England and the American double-divorcťe Wallis Simpson. Then, just as suddenly, she vanished, hounded into exile by Hollywoodís most omni...
Published: 01/05/18
Updated: 01/11/18
Florida Insiders assess the #MeToo, post-Jack Latvala era in Tallahassee

Florida Insiders assess the #MeToo, post-Jack Latvala era in Tallahassee

Infidelity. Snooping private investigators. Big money. Conflicting political ambitions. Sexual harassment. The #MeToo movement. Donald Trump. Paranoia. And the interests of 20 million Floridians.With these issues looming over Floridaís 2018 legislati...
Published: 01/05/18

Romano: Terms limits are for voters who donít trust themselves

Happy 25th anniversary, Florida.Now, letís talk about a divorce.Seriously, this arrangement is no longer working. To be perfectly honest, itís never worked at all.Iím talking about Amendment 9, which Florida passed with great exuberance 25 years ago....
Published: 12/27/17
Updated: 01/04/18
A Little Perspective: Interesting news and notes from around the world

A Little Perspective: Interesting news and notes from around the world

Forget baby showers. Thereís a proposal to give every newborn in the United States a "Baby Bond" account with somewhere between $500 to $50,000 in cash. Neither the kids nor their parents would be able to touch the money until the child turned 18. Th...
Published: 12/26/17
Updated: 01/12/18