Thursday, December 14, 2017
Perspective

Perspective: I got the wrong drug. And $2,500.

I hadn't eaten a big or particularly spicy dinner, so I was surprised to be awakened at midnight by a severe burning in my sternum. I'd dutifully taken — so I thought — Omeprazole, an anti-heartburn drug prescribed for me two years ago for a hiatal hernia. As night wore on, the glass of milk didn't help and the burning got worse. I began to think "ulcer" or "heart attack." At 3:30 a.m., I drove to an all-night drugstore and left with a bottle of generic pink antacid, easing the pain a little. Finally I fell asleep.

After taking another "Omeprazole" to no avail the next day, it occurred to me to look at the container. I saw a female first name, someone else's last name and the name of a drug I'd never heard of: Diflucan.

Google revealed this to be a cure for vaginal yeast infections, with possible side effects of upset stomach. I fished the bag it had come in out of the garbage; my name and "Omeprazole" was printed on its label. The bag was right; the bottle was wrong.

I hadn't looked closely. I've never looked closely because I've never thought I had to. I've never checked the gas pump, either, to make sure it wasn't dispensing orange juice. One trusts certain institutions.

The first thing I did was call my sister-in-law, a doctor, asking her if I would keel over from the Diflucan. "No," she said. "You just won't get a yeast infection." Next I called the pharmacy. The person who answered the phone listened and said: "Okay. Just bring it back, and we'll exchange it."

"That's a pretty big mistake, boss," I said.

"Just bring it back, and we'll exchange it." Click.

We swapped medications without a word between patient and pharmacist other than "Sign here" and "Next!" I opened the bottle at the water cooler, popped a pill and within 20 minutes, abdominal freedom.

I'm not a litigious person, but I was a little riled up, not just because of the physical pain I'd had to endure because of the pharmacy's bungling, but because no one seemed particularly concerned.

It seemed to me that if the pharmacy wasn't interested in apologizing or acknowledging a mistake, some kind of dollar figure was appropriate.

And yet I hesitated. For years I've loathed the American culture of litigiousness, which has only gotten worse since the infamous Liebeck vs. McDonald's lawsuit of 1994, in which a jury awarded the plaintiff $2.86 million for the pain and suffering she endured after spilling hot coffee on herself.

It's common knowledge, too, that squeezing insurance money out of fake or exaggerated injuries is a racket. Ratso Rizzo, played by Dustin Hoffman in the film Midnight Cowboy, is famous for shouting "I'm walkin' here!" when a cab almost hits him; less well-known is what he says to Joe Buck as the two continue: "Actually, that ain't a bad way to pick up insurance."

But I also discovered this wasn't some odd one-off mix-up. Medication mistakes make up a significant portion of the millions of medical errors made each year in the United States. While estimates vary, medication errors injure more than a million patients each year and kill roughly 100,000 of them. These errors can happen during ordering, preparation and dispensing, or just by way of an administrative mistake, in hospitals, doctors' offices or in pharmacies, like mine did. At least I wasn't alone.

I finally called my 93-year-old mom, dispenser of wisdom, telling her I felt like a heel for seeking money when I didn't suffer serious harm from taking the Diflucan.

"That's outrageous," she said. "Go after them."

I didn't know where to start, so I talked to a lawyer friend. "Don't even bother with the store," she told me. "Send a letter to the legal department of the pharmacy and tell them what happened. They'll write you a check. They do it all the time."

Trying to locate the correct person at this nationwide chain store to send my letter of grievance took a lot of time in research, unreturned calls and emails to the abyss. Eventually, though, I found the right fellow and mailed him photos of the bag and bottle along with a letter outlining the situation. I declared that my night of pain and suffering was worth $5,000, the number suggested by my lawyer friend.

A month went by with no response. On day 31, I called the guy up and left him a voice message. To my surprise, he called right back, said he'd gotten my letter, but that $5,000 was too much money. He offered half. I told him I'd call him back.

"Take the $2,500," my lawyer friend told me. "They really don't have to give you anything unless you sue them, and they know most people won't do that unless someone dies or is seriously injured. Most companies count on people cooling off, then throwing up their hands and forgetting about it. If you wait too long, too, they'll probably withdraw the offer."

I called the pharmacy lawyer back and told him I'd take his 50 percent. The call, I should add, was polite on both sides, no growling, neither of us bringing much energy to the negotiations.

My lawyer friend was right — they do this all day long, 40 hours a week. It was like calling the bank. But at the end of the conversation, the lawyer surprised me with: "I'm sorry that happened to you."

I accepted his apology and asked him if I'd be forever unwelcome in that drugstore and whether I should stay away. No worries there. "Actually, the pharmacy will never know a mistake was made," he said. "The money comes from the main office."

My idea had been to make the pharmacy pay for its mistake with a financial tap on the nose, so the pharmacists might be a little more careful in the future.

But it was me who got the wake-up call, after realizing that no one involved, except perhaps the polite man in the main office, seemed to care whether I got the right medication, was sick or well, or whether this systemic problem would ever be cured.

Josh Max is a writer and musician.

© 2017 New York Times

Comments

President Trump isnít watching too much TV; itís just the wrong kind.

By JAMES PONIEWOZIKBecause President Donald Trump has said he is a reader ó big-league reader, reads documents, the best documents ó I hope that he is reading this, and not, say, watching a Fox & Friends recording on the gigantic flat-screen TV that ...
Updated: 9 hours ago
PolitiFact: What you need to know about net neutrality

PolitiFact: What you need to know about net neutrality

The Federal Communications Commissionís vote to scrap Obama-era internet restrictions creates the potential for broadband providers like Frontier and Spectrum to divide their networks into fast lanes and slow lanes, throttle rivalsí video-streaming s...
Updated: 9 hours ago

Perspective: Sexual harassment training doesnít work, but some things do.

Many people are familiar with typical corporate training to prevent sexual harassment: clicking through a PowerPoint, checking a box that you read the employee handbook or attending a mandatory seminar at which someone lectures about harassment while...
Updated: 9 hours ago

12Thatís how many cans of Diet Coke President Donald Trump drinks each day, according to the New York Times.3 timesThatís how much likelier farmed salmon are to be partially deaf than their wild relatives. Scientists at the University of Melbourne de...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Perspective: The year Santa Claus didnít come

Perspective: The year Santa Claus didnít come

The doctor studied the glob of puss oozing from the patchwork of scabs along my one-year-old sonís left index finger."Itís definitely infected. And you have no idea when or how it happened?"He didnít say it, but hereís what I heard next in my head: "...
Updated: 8 hours ago
Perspective: An economist explains how to sort facts from fictions

Perspective: An economist explains how to sort facts from fictions

In public debates about economic policy, it can be hard to separate real insights from political posturing. But a few simple rules of thumb can help.Start with information you can count on. Crucial economic statistics ó like the unemployment rate, in...
Updated: 10 hours ago
News media offers consistently warped portrayals of black families, study finds

News media offers consistently warped portrayals of black families, study finds

If all you knew about black families was what national news outlets reported, you are likely to think African Americans are overwhelmingly poor, reliant on welfare, absentee fathers and criminals, despite what government data show, according to the r...
Updated: 9 hours ago
Perspective: Is the GOP tax plan an unprecedented windfall for the wealthy? We look at 50 years of data to find out.

Perspective: Is the GOP tax plan an unprecedented windfall for the wealthy? We look at 50 years of data to find out.

The Democrats say President Donald Trumpís tax cuts are a massive giveaway to the rich, the most unequal overhaul of the U.S. tax system in modern history. Republicans argue they are a huge middle class tax cut ó "a great, big, beautiful Christmas pr...
Published: 12/05/17
Updated: 12/07/17

Perspective: Guilt can be good for your kid

Guilt can be a complicated element in the parent-child equation; we feel guilty, they feel guilty, we may make them feel guilty and then feel guilty about that. But certain kinds of guilt are a healthy part of child development.Tina Malti, a professo...
Published: 12/04/17
Updated: 12/07/17
Perspective: Why trying new things is so hard to do

Perspective: Why trying new things is so hard to do

By SENDHIL MULLAINATHANI drink a lot of Diet Coke: 2 liters a day, almost six cansí worth. Iím not proud of the habit, but I really like the taste of Diet Coke.As a frugal economist, Iím well aware that switching to a generic brand would save me mone...
Published: 12/03/17
Updated: 12/07/17