Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Florida's stand your ground lawSherdavia JenkinsTrayvon MartinGeorge ZimmermaTrevor DooleySarah Ludemann

What the 'stand your ground' panel didn't do

The task force appointed by Gov. Rick Scott to review Florida's controversial "stand your ground" law spent six months traveling the state, held seven public meetings and heard from 10,000 citizens.

In the end, it did little.

The 19-member group, weighted with supporters of the 2005 bill, issued a report last week, but stopped short of addressing obvious flaws in the law and inconsistencies in its application across the state.

Earlier this year, the Tampa Bay Times spent months identifying "stand your ground" cases and analyzing their outcomes. The results of that investigation were published in a series of stories that could have informed the panel's recommendations.

Here are five glaring issues the panel failed to address:

1. 'Proportionate force'

The panel's report states that "all persons, regardless of citizenship status, have a right to feel safe and secure in our state," and that people have a right to defend themselves from attack "with proportionate force." But it left unstated the fact that most "stand your ground cases" fail that test.

Times' research found that one man killed two unarmed people and walked out of jail. Another shot a man as he lay on the ground. Others went free after shooting their victims in the back. In nearly a third of the cases the Times analyzed, defendants initiated the fight, shot an unarmed person or pursued their victim — and still went free.

In more than half of the cases where the killer got off, the victim was unarmed.

2. Who qualifies?

Defendants engaged in "unlawful activity" are barred from claiming "stand your ground." The panel suggested that lawmakers may want to clarify what they consider "unlawful."

But the panel report did not describe the widespread problem of criminals successfully claiming the defense. The Times revealed that defendants involved in gang shootouts or drug deals have gone free. So have chronic lawbreakers. In fact, nearly 60 percent of defendants in fatal "stand your ground" cases had at least one prior arrest.

One Manatee County drug dealer killed someone, successfully claimed the defense, then killed another man and was forgiven once again under the law.

Instead of focusing on such cases, some panel members fretted about "what-if" scenarios where an overly strict interpretation of "unlawful activity" might prevent someone from claiming self-defense. What if the shooter was an illegal immigrant? What if he was double-parked or littering?

3. Very different outcomes

Can you claim "stand your ground" if your victim is retreating? Can you step outside your front door and shoot someone? Or do you have to lock your door and wait inside?

Courts have come down on both sides of these issues, with defendants in similar circumstances getting the opposite outcome.

Republican Durell Peaden, the former state senator from Crestview who sponsored the bill, said it was never intended for people who put themselves in harm's way before they started firing. But the task force ignored data showing the law is being interpreted precisely that way.

4. Tracking cases

People will always argue over whether making it easier to claim self-defense is a good idea. One indisputable fact — it is extremely difficult to measure the impact if no one keeps track of the cases. The Times spent three months meticulously identifying "stand your ground" cases. But many are nearly impossible to find because when police decide not to pursue a case, no one keeps an account. Even "stand your ground" immunity hearings in front of judges are not systematically logged.

The panel could have called for case tracking, similar to what is required more generally for "justifiable homicide" cases. But it did not mention the issue.

5. Race matters

The task force suggested that lawmakers fund a study to determine how race, gender and other factors affect "stand your ground" outcomes. But the report does not mention what already is known about race and the new law.

The Times found that blacks, whites and Hispanics all have successfully claimed the defense. And the vast majority of the cases reviewed involved victims and defendants of the same race. Outcomes for multirace cases were virtually identical regardless of who was shooting. The only significant difference among races came when looking at who was killed. When the victim was white, the killer went free 59 percent of the time. When the victim was black, the killer went free 73 percent of the time.

What the 'stand your ground' panel didn't do 11/17/12 [Last modified: Sunday, November 18, 2012 2:17pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Trump condemns 'evil losers' who carried out Manchester concert attack

    Politics

    BETHLEHEM, West Bank — President Donald Trump condemned the "evil losers" responsible for the deadly attack on concert-goers in England Tuesday and called on leaders in the Middle East in particular to help root out violence.

    President Donald Trump pauses as he makes a statement on the terrorist attack in Manchester, after a meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Tuesday, May 23, 2017, in the West Bank City of Bethlehem. [Associated Press]
  2. Tampa Bay Times journalists wins 17 Green Eyeshade Awards

    Human Interest

    Tampa Bay Times journalists placed first in seven categories of the prestigious Green Eyeshade awards, which honors outstanding journalism in the Southeast.

  3. A manatee swims near the entrance to Three Sisters Springs on Kings Bay, some of many springs that feed the Crystal River in Citrus County. The Southwest Florida Water Management District is considering a proposal that would allow a decrease to the amount of fresh water flowing in the Crystal River so that water can be diverted to fuel development. Critics say similar proposals around the state could threaten Florida's environmental health. [DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD | Times (2014]
  4. Ailing Florida springs could be tapped further to fuel development

    Water

    BROOKSVILLE — Efforts by state officials to set a minimum flow for its iconic springs have stirred up a wave of public opposition. Opponents contend the state is willing to destroy its springs in order to justify continuing to provide water for new development.

    A manatee swims near the entrance to Three Sisters Springs on Kings Bay, one of many springs that feeds the Crystal River in Citrus County. The Southwest Florida Water Management District is considering a proposal to decrease the amount of fresh water flowing in Crystal River so that water can be diverted to fuel development. Critics say similar proposals around the state could threaten Florida's environmental health. [DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD | Times (2014
  5. Canned by lawmakers, PTC staff say they are now forgotten

    Transportation

    TAMPA — After roughly 20 years in the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Mike Gonzalez got another job with a uniform and badge when he was hired in 2015 as an inspector for the Public Transportation Commission.

    The badge that PTC inspectors carry while on duty. State lawmakers voted to abolish the agency this year leaving its remaining employees fearing for their future.