Sunday, May 27, 2018
Perspective

What you paid. What you'll get.

Last week, we published a story and several charts showing that average government spending on each elderly person is $26,355, compared to $11,822 for each child. Almost immediately, readers wrote to condemn us for overlooking what they considered a key issue.

"Your statements as to expenditures on the elderly is specious at best, and at the least, completely misleading," said one representative letter. "As you point out, most of the government spending on the elderly are Social Security and Medicare payments. These are not payments, but 'repayments' of money that we have been forced to hand over to the government to fund a Ponzi scheme during our working lives. It is not expenditures on the elderly — it is a partial refund of money we have been forced to hand over."

We thought this reader, and others, raised an interesting question: Are Social Security and Medicare payments actually a "partial refund" of what the beneficiary has already paid in? So we took a closer look.

The Urban Institute, a non-partisan research institute in Washington, D.C., produces statistics on this topic annually. Institute researchers figured out what people turning 65 in various years have already "paid in" to the system and what can expect to "take out" after they reach age 65.

Because marital status and family income can significantly affect both the amount paid in and the amount paid out, the institute offers its calculation for various types of family units. To make the final amounts comparable to what might have been done with the tax money had it been invested privately, the institute adjusted all dollar figures at 2 percentage points above the rate of inflation. (The authors note that different assumptions for long-term returns on investment would change the results.)

According to the institute's data, a two-earner couple receiving an average wage — $44,600 per spouse in 2012 dollars — and turning 65 in 2010 would have paid $722,000 into Social Security and Medicare and can be expected to take out $966,000 in benefits. So, this couple will be paid about one-third more in benefits than they paid in taxes.

If a similar couple had retired in 1980, they would have gotten back almost three times what they put in. And if they had retired in 1960, they would have gotten back more than eight times what they paid in. The bigger discrepancies common decades ago can be traced in part to the fact that some of these individuals' working lives came before Social Security taxes were collected beginning in 1937.

Some types of families did much better than average. A couple with only one spouse working (and receiving the same average wage) would have paid in $361,000 if they turned 65 in 2010, but can expect to get back $854,000 — more than double what they paid in. In 1980, this same 65-year-old couple would have received five times more than what they paid in, while in 1960, such a couple would have ended up with 14 times what they put in.

Such findings suggest that, even allowing for inflation and investment gains, many seniors will receive much more in benefits than what they paid in.

Jagadeesh Gokhale of the libertarian Cato Institute says it's possible to quantify exactly how much has been spent on beneficiaries beyond what they paid in, using an obscure line in the massive 2012 report of the Social Security trustees.

In wonk-speak, the figure he's referring to is the "closed-group unfunded obligation estimate for the Social Security program." In layman's terms, it's the inflation-adjusted dollar value of benefits paid — beyond the participants' tax payments — for all past and current beneficiaries by the time of their death.

According to this calculation, past and current generations will pay $71.3 trillion in payroll taxes but will receive $93.4 trillion in benefits. Adjusting for past and future transfers from the federal Treasury, the difference between "paid-in" and "paid-out" works out to $21.6 trillion.

"The $21.6 trillion number will change as soon as we change policies whereby today's generations pay more taxes or surrender some benefits," Gokhale said.

"But until that happens, the exhortation that today's generations are just getting what they are due based on their forced past tax payments is incorrect. 'We' are to get much more under current Social Security laws — to the tune of $21.6 trillion — than we'll pay into the system. The excess benefits are a 'return' on past and current generations' taxes of $71.3 trillion — and quite a handsome return it is!"

We should note a few caveats and complications.

First, this $21.6 trillion figure only addresses Social Security, not Medicare. And as it happens, there are some differences between how the two programs fare in the institute's calculations.

For an average-wage-earning, two-income couple turning 65 in 2010, the pay-in, pay-out ratio for Social Security by itself will actually be slightly negative —- the couple will have paid $600,000 in lifetime Social Security taxes and will receive only $579,000 in lifetime Social Security benefits. (Remember, the couple didn't literally pay out $600,000; that's the current value of what they paid out over the years, plus an additional 2 percent they may have gotten had it been invested.)

And even so, the Social Security shortfall will be more than evened out by the extra dollars the couple gets back from Medicare. The couple will have paid $122,000 in Medicare taxes but will receive $387,000 in benefits — more than three times what they paid in.

In addition, Timothy Smeeding, a public policy professor at the University of Wisconsin, notes that when judging Social Security, it's not just a question of dollars paid out, but also the intangible benefits bestowed. The program's future benefit checks provide a sense of financial security for one's retirement years, and beneficiaries get coverage for disability and survivors' insurance throughout their entire working careers. Such insurance would otherwise have to be purchased commercially.

"If you are 65 and crowing that you didn't get your money's worth, then you were lucky to never have used the other two parts of the safety net — disability insurance and survivor's insurance," Smeeding said.

Finally, the Urban Institute notes that, in a practical sense, Americans aren't paying their Social Security tax dollars into a personal account and then taking those dollars out, plus interest, once they retire. While there is technically a modest Social Security trust fund, the federal government has long paid out most Social Security revenues to beneficiaries, leaving the government and future workers with what amounts to an IOU to cover the next generation of beneficiaries.

The taxes paid by active workers help support today's generation of retirees — which is a big reason why some policymakers are concerned about the program's long-term solvency. In 1950, the average American lived for 68 years and retirees were supported by 16 active workers. Now, the average life expectancy is 78 and just three workers support every retiree.

By the time today's middle-aged workers reach retirement age, only two workers will be around to support their benefits. Promised benefits will exceed revenues by about 30 percent, and there will be no money in the trust fund to rely on.

Thus, Social Security is — and always has been — a transfer system from younger generations to older generations.

"We're not really entitled to get our money back since we didn't save it but rather spent it on our parents," said C. Eugene Steuerle, who helped assemble the Urban Institute's calculations. "Moreover, when 'things happen,' like a decline in kids per adult, society has to adjust regardless."

Contact Louis Jacobson at [email protected]

current retirees: Six scenarios

In most cases, people get more from Social Security and Medicare combined than they put in, though the specific amount can vary depending on income and family circumstances. Here are some examples for people who turned 65 in 2010. See the footnotes for some important caveats.



Footnotes: The calculations assume that the retiree worked from 22 until retiring at 65. The tax totals listed here are higher than the retirees actually paid. Why? The Urban Institute statisticians adjusted the value of the taxes to reflect inflation — so a dollar paid in Social Security taxes in, say, 1980 is adjusted upward as if the worker had paid it in current dollars — and a 2 percent interest rate is tacked on top of that to mimic what would have happened to those dollars had they been put in a personal savings account. (Of course, using another percentage would make a difference.) For Medicare, (a) the calculations figure that the recipient paid both her tax and her employer's contribution (because economists typically think of that as money the employer would otherwise spend on wages instead) and (b) they subtract the cost of Medicare premiums before totaling up the benefits.

Source: Urban Institute STEVE MADDEN | Times

Comments
The real stuff is how Tom Wolfe best used his write stuff

The real stuff is how Tom Wolfe best used his write stuff

Tom Wolfe’s best writing lifted real people into legend: car designers and astronauts and disciples of LSD. With that writing, Wolfe lifted himself into legend as well. The author of 16 books, including such bestsellers as The Right Stuff and ...
Published: 05/18/18
Oh, Florida! Without air conditioning we’re a stinky swamp of sweat. With it, we warm the world

Oh, Florida! Without air conditioning we’re a stinky swamp of sweat. With it, we warm the world

As I write this, some workers are disassembling the 24-year-old air conditioning system in my house. They’re clunking and clanking around, tromping up and down my stairs, so they can replace the old system with a new one that presumably wonR...
Published: 05/17/18
Updated: 05/18/18
PolitiFact: Is Mike Pence right that religion is gaining new life in U.S.?

PolitiFact: Is Mike Pence right that religion is gaining new life in U.S.?

Speaking at a commencement ceremony at Hillsdale College in Michigan, Vice President Mike Pence told the graduates that religion in the United States is going strong."The percentage of Americans who live out their religion on a weekly basis ó praying...
Published: 05/17/18
Updated: 05/18/18
Column: Why baby steps toward cheaper drugs are the best we can do

Column: Why baby steps toward cheaper drugs are the best we can do

On the stump, Donald Trump the candidate promised big changes in the way America buys prescription drugs ó allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers, and allowing Americans to buy at the prices that Canada ...
Published: 05/15/18
Updated: 05/18/18
PolitiFact: Can Robert Mueller subpoena Donald Trump? A look at the legal precedents

PolitiFact: Can Robert Mueller subpoena Donald Trump? A look at the legal precedents

President Donald Trump has said heíd "love to speak" to special counsel Robert Mueller but that some of his lawyers advise against it.The latest member of Trumpís legal team, Rudy Giuliani, said Trump is under no obligation to comply with a subpoena ...
Published: 05/09/18
Updated: 05/13/18

Column: Moms looking out for daughters who need special medical treatment

Five years ago, shortly after celebrating Motherís Day, my mom watched as her oldest child was wheeled into brain surgery to undergo a procedure to help cope with the symptoms of early Parkinsonís disease. The operation, known as Deep Brain Stimulati...
Published: 05/09/18
Updated: 05/13/18
Column: As the last Rosewood survivor dies, letís remember our duty to address injustice

Column: As the last Rosewood survivor dies, letís remember our duty to address injustice

Mary Hall Daniels was a child of 3 when a white mob destroyed her home and the predominantly African-American community of Rosewood in Levy County in 1923. The last survivor of what came to be known as the Rosewood massacre, Mrs. Daniels died on May ...
Published: 05/08/18
Updated: 05/13/18
Perspective: Let’s build a ‘house’ for Kerouac in St. Pete ... (no not that one)

Perspective: Let’s build a ‘house’ for Kerouac in St. Pete ... (no not that one)

Over my writing desk is a pop-art image of Jack Kerouac. He is so handsome. In purple, orange, and shades of green, it shows him in his prime, a typewriter in the corner and his words about the people he loves, the ones who "burn, burn, burn like fab...
Published: 05/07/18
Updated: 05/13/18
Five interesting facts

Five interesting facts

$171.5 millionis how much drug makers spent lobbying the federal government last year, more than any other industry.Just 36%of Republicans last year thought free trade had been good for the United States, down from 57 percent in 2009, according to th...
Published: 05/07/18
Updated: 05/13/18
A Little Perspective: Interesting news and notes from around the world

A Little Perspective: Interesting news and notes from around the world

Another state has joined the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, bringing electoral reformers closer to their goal of sidestepping the Electoral College to elect presidents by a nationwide popular vote instead. Under the compact, states pledge ...
Published: 05/03/18
Updated: 05/13/18