Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Carlton: They tried and failed to put Amendment 1 over on Florida voters

As voters, we sometimes get fooled.

Candidates and causes fill our mailboxes with fliers that say the other guy lies, cheats and deliberately blocks the Publix aisle with his cart. This particular election, some savvy ads implied a certain constitutional amendment we were about to vote on would surely fill our lives with sunshine.

And sometimes, voters are smarter than that.

Amendment 1 looked like a done deal for Florida. Earlier polls had the so-called solar amendment easily getting the 60 percent of the vote a proposed amendment needs to become enshrined in our state Constitution.

Because of course we were for it. We live in Florida, where sun is abundant. Isn't it time we got serious about harnessing all that potential energy in a meaningful way — and maybe even bringing down our own electric bills to boot?

Except the utility-backed Amendment 1 would have actually limited rooftop solar expansion. What might have looked to a reasonable person like an effort to expand our ability to make good use of the sun was really about restricting third-party sales of rooftop solar and keeping the utilities in control.

How cynical was this push to make us believers in Amendment 1?

Backers tried to use our trust in firefighters in ads implying that solar panels could be a fire hazard, saying Amendment 1 would do solar "the right way." One retired fire captain who actually uses solar came forward to call this "one of the biggest scams on Floridians in the history of the state."

How low would cynical go? Ads told Florida seniors that Amendment 1 would protect them from "scams and ripoffs" — a brilliant play, given that our seniors have reason to be leery of an ever-ready contingent of grifters out there.

Except it turned out that Amendment 1 wouldn't particularly protect seniors or anyone else.

The Florida Supreme Court narrowly approved the amendment's ballot language, 4-3. But for the record, dissenting Justice Barbara Pariente did call it "a wolf in sheep's clothing" because it was "masquerading as a pro-solar energy initiative."

Disheartening, yes. But in a world of dirty politics, here's the happy ending.

Word got out about Amendment 1 and spread. Environmental types, people of all political stripe, newspapers, solar businesses and others united for a little truth-telling. Days before the election, the Florida Professional Firefighters association withdrew its support. "Vote No On 1" signs with a sun peeking from behind an appropriately dark cloud sprouted everywhere.

And this week, an allegedly pro-solar amendment died short of the 60 percent it needed.

We are still picking through the aftermath of a monumental election and figuring out what to take away from it all. But this one is as clear as Florida morning sunshine through a kitchen window.

Some seriously cynical people spent millions counting on voters of this state to be complacent, or busy or to assume they were told the truth. They set out to use any optimism about the possibility of a sunny solar future against us.

Thanks to an outraged grass roots campaign that pushed back, Florida voters were not having it. So at least on 1, score one for us.

Sue Carlton can be reached at

Carlton: They tried and failed to put Amendment 1 over on Florida voters 11/10/16 [Last modified: Thursday, November 10, 2016 7:00pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. New owners take over downtown St. Petersburg's Hofbräuhaus


    ST. PETERSBURG — The downtown German beer-hall Hofbräuhaus St. Petersburg has been bought by a partnership led by former Checkers Drive-In Restaurants president Keith Sirois.

    The Hofbrauhaus, St. Petersburg, located in the former historic Tramor Cafeteria, St. Petersburg, is under new ownership.

  2. Editorial: Once more, homeowners are let down by state housing agency


    Once upon a time, the federal government created a program called the Hardest Hit Fund. Its goal was admirable, and its mission important. The fund was designed to aid Americans in danger of losing their houses after the Great Recession had wreaked havoc on the economy. Unfortunately, the folks in Washington erred in …

    The Hardest Hit Fund was designed to aid Americans in danger of losing their houses after the Great Recession. Unfortunately, the folks in Washington trusted Florida to get that money into the hands of people who needed it most.
  3. Editorial: Lessons from Hurricane Irma


    Two weeks later, Florida is still recovering from Hurricane Irma. But with federal, state and local officials still on the ground, and the experience fresh, now is a good time to start assessing what went right, what went wrong and how Florida can better prepare for the next one.


    More than 6 million of Florida’s 10 million residential and business customers lost power, including about 80 percent of Duke Energy’s customers in Pinellas.
  4. Back in bargaining, Hillsborough school district and its teachers are $50 million apart


    It started off nice and friendly. Gretchen Saunders, chief business officer for the Hillsborough County Public Schools, passed candy around the room. Negotiators for the district and the teachers' union commended one another for their good work during Hurricane Irma. The union thanked the district for paying everybody a …

    This a breakdown of what the school district says the teachers' union requests would cost if granted. The union rejects many of these numbers.
  5. Study: Dispersant used to clean 2010 BP oil spill harmed humans


    A first-of-its-kind scientific study has determined that the dispersant BP sprayed at the oil gushing from the Deepwater Horizon rig in 2010 harmed human health.

    This image from a 2010 video provided by BP shows dispersant, white plume at center, being applied to an oil leak at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. A first-of-its-kind scientific study has determined that the dispersant BP used to clean-up the oil spill harmed human health. (AP Photo/BP PLC)