Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Politics: Elections & Campaigns
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Considering new energy plan, Obama softens stance on drilling

By Adam Smith and Wes Allison, Times Staff Writers
Posted: Aug 01, 2008 03:30 PM


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

ST. PETERSBURG — Long an opponent of offshore drilling, Sen. Barack Obama offered encouraging words for a bipartisan energy plan that would permit oil drilling within 50 miles of Florida's west coast.

In an interview with the St. Petersburg Times and Bay News 9's Political Connections this morning, Obama commended the self-styled "Gang of 10" senators who earlier in the day introduced a broad energy bill that also would funnel billions into developing renewable sources.

"My attitude is that we can find some sort of compromise," Obama told the Times shortly after talking with voters at Gibbs High School. "If it is part of an overarching package, then I am not going to be rigid in preventing an energy package that goes forward that is really thoughtful and is going to really solve the problem."

Although short of an endorsement, Obama expressed a new willingness to consider the U.S. coast for oil exploration.

This morning at the U.S. Capitol, five Democrats and five Republicans announced a comprehensive energy plan designed to break the gridlock over energy policy that has nearly brought the Senate to a standstill in recent weeks.

It calls for allowing offshore drilling as close as 50 miles from Florida's west coast, which is currently protected by a 2006 law banning drilling within about 230 miles of Tampa Bay and 125 miles from the Panhandle.

Drilling would also be allowed 50 miles off the coasts of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia if their state legislatures allowed it. Florida would have no say over the matter because Senate advocates think the eastern Gulf of Mexico offers the best chance to get more oil and natural gas to market quickly.

Years-old surveys suggest recoverable reserves there, particularly of natural gas, and drilling operations in the eastern gulf could easily tap into existing pipelines and other infrastructure off the coasts of Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana, the senators said.

"It's only a logical extension of what's happening in the gulf" to the west, said U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, the lead Republican sponsor of the plan.

U.S. Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, his Democratic counterpart, said, "We know that because of soundings that have already been made, there is tremendous potential in the eastern gulf."

If Obama were to formally embrace the plan, it would go a long way toward making passage possible this fall. One key reason Democrats in the Senate and House have been reluctant to support Republican challenges to allow more offshore drilling has been Obama's opposition. Congressional leaders of either party are unlikely to take a position on any major policy that runs counter to their presidential candidate's views.

In the interview, Obama reiterated his belief that "we are not going to drill our way out of this problem. We have 3 percent of the world's oil reserves. We use 25 percent of the world's oil.

"And what I've also said is, if people are expecting short-term relief because of offshore drilling, then they're not going to find it because we won't see a drop of oil for at least a decade."

Still, Obama's willingness to go along with any new drilling off the U.S. coast is a marked shift from his previous statements. Earlier this summer, Obama sought to distinguish himself from GOP rival Sen. John McCain, who wants to lift a moratorium on offshore drilling.

"And when I am president," Obama said in June in Chicago, "I will keep the moratorium in place and prevent oil companies from drilling off Florida's coasts. That's how we can protect our coasts and still make the investments that will reduce our dependence on foreign oil and bring down gas prices for good."

This morning, Obama said this: "So what I want to do is just to make sure that we are putting together the kind of comprehensive plan that is going to work. And if you have a package that is offshore drilling only, which is essentially what Bush and McCain have been emphasizing, then I think that that is not going to solve the problem and I would be opposed to that."

Both of Florida's U.S. senators, Democrat Bill Nelson and Republican Mel Martinez, oppose the idea on grounds that it's unfair to Florida.

But members of the Gang of 10 said they think the key to getting more drilling through the Senate is balance, so the bill also calls for spending $84-billion over 10 years on research and development of better batteries, fuels and energy-saving technologies, including tax incentives for people who buy hybrid and alternative-fueled cars and trucks.

The plan would be funded largely by the royalties that energy companies pay the government for the right to drill in federal waters, and the repeal of $30-billion in tax breaks given to oil and gas companies.

Republicans have long opposed repealing those tax breaks, saying they encourage oil companies to explore for more oil and gas. But with record oil company profits — ExxonMobile posted quarterly profits this week of $11-billion, for instance — the senators said that argument is getting tougher to make.

"With oil at these levels, we don't think the manufacturing credit is necessary to encourage them to explore for oil and gas," Conrad said.

Adam Smith reported from the Obama campaign in Florida. Wes Allison reported from Washington. Rob Farley contributed to this report.



[Last modified: Aug 06, 2008 03:45 PM]



Comments on this article
by jim Aug 6, 2008 3:45 PM
the both of them quit flip flopping
by JIM Aug 6, 2008 3:18 PM
drilling now won't solve our oil problem.it will take 2/3 years or longer to see the down size of oil drilling, but at the start of just saying it will drop the price of a gallon of gas. starting drilling will drop it more per gallon. start drilling
by Dan Aug 6, 2008 12:15 PM
Hey you can drill right in my yard. Our screwed up tax system has made my property worth less then ever so maybe I can make some money on oil.
by Franki Aug 4, 2008 6:09 PM
No more drilling. Just not a wise move.
by Theresa Aug 4, 2008 5:49 PM
The only reason he has changed his stance on drilling is the fact he is tied with McCain in the polls. Same way the only reason he recommended FL get back their full delegation. He is unelectable and an opportunist.
by Darren Aug 4, 2008 4:32 PM
Obama is brave to change his position (based on the realities on the ground), knowing that he would take a big hit from the left for enviro, and the right for flipping. He knows it carries a big political price. The win? 84b for renewable energy.
by Kelly Aug 4, 2008 3:13 PM
Bad idea Barrack!! Have you been to South Texas? The beaches are covered in oil tar and the waters are a mess. Just say no Florida.
by Edna Aug 4, 2008 2:39 PM
I passionately hope Obama will return to his original position of NO offshore drilling. We cannot drill our way out of our addiction to oil, we must instead move toward a clean, green, sustainable, self-sufficient future based on solar and wind.
by James Aug 3, 2008 11:23 AM
Think first... Obama is personally opposed to drilling, but will consider it in order to get something done because the GOP won't budge otherwise. McCain is gung-ho, all for it. So, if you're against drilling, for whom should you vote?
by Kim Aug 3, 2008 8:57 AM
I think it's ironic, that when the drilling plan was being embraced by Crist a month ago, everyone on here was all for it--"Yeah! Drill the Gulf! Lower gas prices!" Then when someone who was against it is now FOR it, you all jump on his case.
by luke Aug 3, 2008 8:57 AM
This is a smart idea. I like the bill. I think ofshore drilling is nonsense, but I'm happy to let it happen if we rescind the subsidies and tax credits to these oil companies. And under the condition that all this petroleum be sold in the U.S. -Debs
by LisaHussein Aug 3, 2008 8:57 AM
It amazes me that we can't get an objective report on what the man said. Tell the WHOLE STORY. Don't just include the parts that fit your narrative
by halisi Aug 3, 2008 8:57 AM
You left this part of his statement: "Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always supported...I remain skeptical that new offshore drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly reduce oil dependency..."
by Barry In Las Vegas Aug 2, 2008 11:03 PM
This was for Saturday's news. Moveon.org and the other crazies will have a "Come to Jesus" conversation with Obama, and by Tuesday he will be saying he was misunderstood and go back to his no drilling position. Both ways Obama.
by Robert Aug 2, 2008 11:03 PM
Ohhh wow.. Yet ANOTHER FLIP-FLOP. I'm so shocked and outraged. Yawn.
by KenBenobi Aug 2, 2008 11:03 PM
Nothing wrong here, folks. WAKE UP. Obama's job is to get us off oil any way he can. The Oil Companies OWN Washington, so the only way to beat them is to go around back. If you want FLIP-FLOPS, McSurge is your man.
by Tom Aug 2, 2008 11:03 PM
Do you all not realize without compromise, Congress will do nothing? NO drilling, NO solar, NO wind, NOTHING. We will all keep being bled dry by oil companies and power companies. Don't turn your back on the guy who is willing to try to compromise.
by Tom Aug 2, 2008 11:03 PM
Many of you miss the point, Obama still believes that drilling will not solve our problems, but compromise is necessary to acheive the greater goal of getting those right wing oil mongers to go along with investing in alternative energy resources.
by Jack C. Wheeler Aug 2, 2008 11:01 PM
As each of you campaign for votes during your FIVE WEEK ?RECESS?, would ask you share answers to the following questions with your constituents: ? What is the estimate of job losses from the lack of an energy policy from the US Congress? ? What perc
by Peter Aug 2, 2008 7:50 PM
I have a great idea! California and Florida can just ban the importation of all fossil fuels whatsoever and mandate horse barns, corrals and feeding stations. Oh I forgot, they should also include a $500 fine for not cleaning up after your horse.
by Marross Aug 2, 2008 7:50 PM
Again the media shows its bias toward Obama. Your headline is Obama "softens" stance on drilling. What a nice, gentle word. Almost nothing to it, really. Of course if it had been Clinton or McCain, the headlines would have been "flip-flops" or worse!
by Clearwater Steve Aug 2, 2008 7:50 PM
I believe that his campaign motto is "change we can believe in"....so any changes should not surprise...
by mister rodgers Aug 2, 2008 7:49 PM
McCain was against drilling just 3 months ago until big oil started funding his campaign. Obama is clear he does not favor drilling, but will compromise if these hard-headed republicans will finally stop the tax breaks to oil companies. Do you want leaders who are hard-headed partisans or do you want someone who will actually work with the other side to accomplish something?
by RoberttheBob Aug 2, 2008 5:52 PM
I think this just might be the beginning of the ANWR Awakening - a dramatic example of former opponents coming to the realization they've been on the wrong side all along. I hope it eventually extends to McCain - the logical conclusion to the issue.
by Mary Ellen Aug 2, 2008 5:52 PM
Wow! And they said John Kerry was a "flip flopper"... No politician in recent memory has flip flopped more than Obama.
by LaughingLou Aug 2, 2008 5:52 PM
Bush often made decisions on things he had little clue about, but at least he understood that leaders make decisions. It is clear Obama does not get that, and is not decisive. For him being a leader means sitting on the fence about everything.
by Edward Aug 2, 2008 5:52 PM
He called for a $1,000 emergency tax rebate to help taxpayers offset rising energy costs. He proposed paying for the rebate with the windfall profits of oil companies. Obama needs to immediately retract that or he will lose.
by Jesse Aug 2, 2008 5:51 PM
andre- are you really saying that you think it is okay for Iran to have nukes?? If so, you need your head examined! I suppose you think Obama can keep this guy in a trance (like his supporters) and keep him from killing millions!
by Pam Aug 2, 2008 5:51 PM
Obama is hedging words to deflate McCain & the Drill Now Movement & will say anything just to get elected. If elected he will claim to study it & "find it not to be a plausible solution". Beware this Obama Flip Flop. He speaks with a forked tongue.
by BRob Aug 2, 2008 5:51 PM
For all those yelling about the flip flop, one question: is his new position good or bad? I looked at the plan and it is sound. So why in the hell should he oppose a sound plan for the sake of consistency? He is a realist, not an ideologue.
by Marty S. Aug 2, 2008 5:35 PM
Rose - your stats on rigs during Katrina/Rita are entirely WRONG and what hurricane has occurred since McCain started runnning? Susan - the only issue he HASN'T flipped on is the "I'm going to tax you into oblivion" issue.
by Tom Aug 2, 2008 5:35 PM
I thought inflated tires was the answer, another flip flop, sorry but senator obama is as phony as a 3 dollar bill. how can there be any doubt in anyones mind that this guy does not have what it takes to be president.
by joe Aug 2, 2008 5:34 PM
While I'm sure many Floridians oppose offshore drilling, and for good reason, the fact remains that compromise is the cornerstone of good government. A comprehensive energy bill will require such concessions as a result of congress's current struct.
by gladRocks Aug 2, 2008 5:27 PM
Eric M who we should "keep speculators out of oil futures". Speculators are the futures. Without them, there would be no market and no oil. Speculators sell as well as buy, which you will see based on Monday. Obama flops on Oil. Oil goes down.
by Tim Aug 2, 2008 5:26 PM
The plan sounds reasonable, although it does seem that Florida should have a say so since drilling might affect tourism. Good for Obama for willingness to compromise. The bipartisan divide on issues does not serve the public well.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT