Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

If you don't like the Lens, think about the alternatives

On Tuesday, voters will get the chance to decide the fate of the Lens, the proposal to replace St. Petersburg’s iconic Pier.

City of St. Petersburg

On Tuesday, voters will get the chance to decide the fate of the Lens, the proposal to replace St. Petersburg’s iconic Pier.

Years from now, they will talk of the Lens with a mixture of mystery and awe.

Remember, they will ask, the delusion of the underwater garden?

(Blank stare.)

How about the wonder of the tiki hut that never was?

(Shoulder shrug.)

Perhaps the bitter fight that divided a city?

Oh, (slaps forehead) the Lens!

Unlike the piers that came before it, the Lens is not likely to leave postcards or family memories in its wake. If the chatter is correct, the Lens will cease to be after Tuesday's referendum, making its death certificate the only proof of its theoretical existence.

For the most part, I'm okay with that. I was never particularly drawn to the idea, arguing it was more amenity than attraction. Fifteen months ago I suggested the City Council might want to rethink committing so much money to a structure that seemed more decorative than functional.

So if you vote for the Lens' demise on Tuesday, you will not get a loud argument out of me. My only request is that you understand exactly what your vote means.

Killing the Lens will not magically, or even hypothetically, return the current Pier to its former glory. Chances are, that Pier won't return at all. It has long been a money pit for St. Petersburg taxpayers, and a diminishing beacon to the type of visitors the city should be hoping to attract.

And that doesn't even get into the debate regarding the age of the structure and the stability of its foundation.

Killing the Lens also does not mean Ferris wheels and shark tanks are going to suddenly appear in some grand structure above the water. The $50 million budget has already been dinged by Lens bills, and it wasn't enough for Disney-like fun in the first place.

So where does a vote to stop the Lens leave us?

For the most part, stranded on the shore.

A whole new set of ideas will have to be considered, and the same old economic restrictions will still be in place. The perfect solution may yet exist, but inspiration seems to be taking its sweet time in arriving.

Here's the challenge:

Build something: A) unique; B) above the water; C) on a limited budget; D) to universal acclaim. In other words, good luck to that architectural firm.

One alternative is building something attractive, and far more cost-effective, on waterfront land with a more modest pier to complement it.

Of course, that idea is not going to win much support along Beach Drive, nor will it be a hit with residents who see the Pier as vital to St. Petersburg's identity.

Another popular option will surely be the renovation of the current Pier. This option might sound appealing if you dismiss studies commissioned by the city that say renovation costs would far exceed the $50 million budget. This option also requires you to dismiss the fact that the Pier draws far fewer residents than it once did, and the city has been losing money by subsidizing tenants and paying for upkeep.

Do you see where I'm going with this?

There is no one-pier-fits-all answer. Some sizable portion of residents will always feel the solution is too expensive or too boring or too chic or too fill-in-the-blank.

Maybe the Lens doesn't do it for you. I get that. I've even said it myself.

Just be aware that you may like the alternative even less.

If you don't like the Lens, think about the alternatives 08/24/13 [Last modified: Saturday, August 24, 2013 8:21pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Search under way for missing sailors; Navy chief orders inquiry


    SINGAPORE — The U.S. Navy ordered a broad investigation Monday into the performance and readiness of the Pacific-based 7th Fleet after the USS John S. McCain collided with an oil tanker in Southeast Asian waters, leaving 10 U.S. sailors missing and others injured.

    Damage is visible as the USS John S. McCain steers toward Singapore’s naval base on Monday.
  2. Told not to look, Donald Trump looks at the solar eclipse


    Of course he looked.

    Monday's solar eclipse — life-giving, eye-threatening, ostensibly apolitical — summoned the nation's First Viewer to the Truman Balcony of the White House around 2:38 p.m. Eastern time.

    The executive metaphor came quickly.

    President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump view the solar eclipse from the Truman balcony of the White House, in Washington, Aug. 21, 2017. [Al Drago | New York Times]
  3. Secret Service says it will run out of money to protect Trump and his family Sept. 30


    WASHINGTON — The Secret Service said Monday that it has enough money to cover the cost of protecting President Donald Trump and his family through the end of September, but after that the agency will hit a federally mandated cap on salaries and overtime unless Congress intervenes.

    Secret service agents walk with President Donald Trump after a ceremony to welcome the 2016 NCAA Football National Champions the Clemson Tigers on the South Lawn of the White House on June 12, 2017. [Olivier Douliery | Sipa USA via TNS]
  4. After fraught debate, Trump to disclose new Afghanistan plan


    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump will unveil his updated Afghanistan policy Monday night in a rare, prime-time address to a nation that broadly shares his pessimism about American involvement in the 16-year conflict. Although he may send a few thousand more troops, there are no signs of a major shift in …

    U.S. soldiers patrol the perimeter of a weapons cache near the U.S. military base in Bagram, Afghanistan in 2003. Sixteen years of U.S. warfare in Afghanistan have left the insurgents as strong as ever and the nation's future precarious. Facing a quagmire, President Donald Trump on Monday will outline his strategy for a country that has historically snared great powers and defied easy solutions.  [Associated Press (2003)]
  5. Trial begins for man accused of threatening to kill Tampa federal judge


    TAMPA — Jason Jerome Springer was in jail awaiting trial on a firearms charge when he heard inmates talking about a case that had made the news.

    His attorney said Jason Jerome Springer, 39, just talked, and there was “no true threat.”