Rain74° WeatherRain74° Weather

Legislature's proposed amendments offer referendum on GOP agenda

When voters head to the polls Nov. 2, they'll be judging the handiwork of the Republican-led Legislature: six proposed constitutional amendments and one straw poll.

Add in citizens' initiatives and the total number of ballot issues stands at 10.

Seven of the items are from a Legislature that, grousing about government-by-referendum, persuaded voters to change the Constitution in 2006 so amendments now must be approved by at least 60 percent of voters.

When considered together, the seven new measures offer an unofficial vote of confidence on the Republican political agenda.

The Legislature's constitutional amendments end public financing of political campaigns, change the standards for drawing legislative seats, scale back the state's class-size amendment and send a message to Washington over its health care programs and spending. Two more would expand some property-tax breaks.

"This is about good policy," said future House Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park. ''It's about reducing the role of government, and preserving the separation of powers in our Constitutional system."

Democrats like Ronald Brisé of Miami say the amendments show how Republicans failed to fix problems during the legislative session that ended Friday. He pointed to the high number of uninsured Floridians — 4 million — and the fact that the state anticipates using up to $3.4 billion in federal stimulus money.

Even as they included the federal money in their calculations, Republicans pushed a nonbinding referendum through the Legislature that asks for a U.S. Constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget and to stop "the uncontrolled growth of our national debt."

"The Republicans want to change the subject," Brisé said.

Pollsters and pundits predicts relatively easy passage for three amendments the Legislature passed last year for the 2010 ballot. Those measures end public financing of campaigns, give property tax credits to soldiers deployed overseas and property-tax breaks to first-time homesteaders and owners of non-homesteaded properties.

The Legislature's three amendments approved this session will likely have a tougher time because they take on special interest groups. Two — redistricting and the class-size scaleback — directly take on the Florida Education Association, a Democratic-leaning union that successfully backed the existing class-size amendment.

Along with trial lawyers, the union also helped underwrite the group Fair Districts Florida, which placed two of the citizen-initiated amendments on the ballot. The other citizens initiative on the 2010 ballot concerns growth management and was sponsored by a group called Hometown Democracy.

Legislative leaders have proposed their own initiative in response to the Fair Districts amendments, which could weaken the Republican leadership's ability in 2012 to draw congressional and legislative districts that benefit the GOP.

Known also as "redistricting," the once-a-decade process of drawing political boundaries happens after every census to make sure each legislative district and each congressional district has the same number of residents.

Redistricting gives incumbent legislators broad power to choose the types of voters who would elect them. Throughout the process, the majority party tries to remain in control by packing a disproportionate number of the minority party's voters into fewer districts statewide. The minority party inevitably sues.

After a court helped redraw districts in the 1990s, Republicans took control of the Legislature. Right now, Republicans control about 64 percent of seats in the Legislature. But Republicans account for just 36 percent of registered Florida voters.

"Why aren't the Democrats in control?" asked incoming Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island. "Candidates — who the candidate is — matters. Elections matter."

The Fair Districts proposals could change that. The amendments explicitly ban the Legislature from drawing boundaries "with the intent to favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent."

The two amendments — one for legislative seats, one for congressional seats — also say the Legislature cannot draw districts with the intent to deny, abridge or diminish minority voting rights.

But the amendments are still a threat to minorities, says Haridopolos, who helped propose another amendment — also on the ballot — that says lawmakers shall "take into consideration the ability of racial and language minorities to participate in the political process and elect candidates of their choice." The amendment also says "communities of interest other than political parties may be respected and promoted." That brings the number of redistricting amendments to three on the ballot.

Haridopolos said the new amendment "clarifies'' the Fair Districts proposals. Opponents say it causes confusion, in part because "communities of interest'' isn't clearly defined.

This session, class size also returned as an issue as the Senate reversed itself and approved the scale-back to the 2002 amendment.

Assuming that a school met the current average class-cap limitations, the maximum number of students in some classes would increase under the amendment to:

• 21 in preK-3rd grade. The current cap is 18.

• 27 in grades 4-8. The current cap is 22.

• 30 in grades 9-12. The current cap is 25.

The Legislature is also saying no to health reform initiatives it doesn't propose.

In response to President Barack Obama's health reform mandate that nearly everyone purchase private insurance, Republicans passed the "Health Care Freedom'' act. It says government can't "compel, directly or indirectly, any person, employer, or health care provider to participate in any health care system."

Rep. Scott Plakon, a Longwood Republican who sponsored the amendment, acknowledged that federal law trumps state law. He said the amendment would, however, block a future Legislature from passing a state insurance mandate, as Massachusetts did.

Sen. Paula Dockery, a Lakeland Republican running for governor, supported each legislative proposal except for the Legislature's redistricting amendment.

"It's kind of ironic," Dockery said. "For a Legislature that says it doesn't like putting lots of stuff on the ballot, we're putting a lot of Constitutional amendments out there of our own."

Times/Herald staff writer Mary Ellen Klas contributed to this report. Marc Caputo can be reached at mcaputo@MiamiHerald.com.

Legislature's proposed amendments offer referendum on GOP agenda 05/02/10 [Last modified: Monday, May 3, 2010 8:24am]

© 2014 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...