Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

From top to bottom, FEMA has botched handling flood insurance rates

Let's play a game. We'll call it Spot the Flaws.

Here is part of FEMA's official explanation about how its National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) arrived at new premiums for homes that had rate subsidies:

"The single most important (factor) is the elevation of the structure in relation to the Base Flood Elevation.''

And here is a snippet from an inquiry by an investigative arm of Congress that examined subsidized flood policies:

"According to NFIP data, property elevations relative to the base flood elevation are unknown for 97 percent of … the 1.15 million historically subsidized policies.''

Do you spot the flaw?

FEMA officials are raising premiums despite not having the single most important piece of information they themselves say is needed to establish accurate rates.

Seems kind of nutty, right?

Just wait, there's more.

Because the NFIP has pretty much cornered the market on flood insurance policies for the past 40 years, no one else has had reason to produce rate studies. FEMA does not publicize its accounting methods and did not return a call this week.

"We've been talking to FEMA about how they set their rates for some time,'' said Alicia Puente Cackley, who has authored several flood insurance studies for the U.S. Government Accountability Office. "We've asked them to explain it to us.

"It hasn't been the exact same explanation each time.''

Spot the flaw?

FEMA not only lacks basic information, it also lacks a checks and balance system. It can set rates without transparency, recourse or even logic.

The accountability office's report last July indicated FEMA has, at different times, suggested subsidized policy holders were paying between 35-45 percent of their true cost. Yet some Pinellas County residents say rates have jumped 500 percent or more.

Spot the flaw?

When Congress passed Biggert-Waters in 2012, FEMA was instructed to rid itself of subsidized policies and produce an affordability study.

By the end of 2013, the agency had eliminated 40 percent of its subsidized policies and had begun increasing rates for the rest. It obviously moved quickly to comply. Yet in early 2014, the agency still had not started an affordability study. In other words, FEMA selectively chose which edicts it would jump on.

Meanwhile, the accountability office warned that by moving so quickly to raise rates, the program could be putting itself in increased financial jeopardy due to a loss of revenue from homeowners who simply stop carrying coverage.

Spot the flaw?

In short, everything about FEMA's implementation of Biggert-Waters stinks.

It appears the agency employed a whatever-it-takes attitude to get out of debt while ignoring basic science, math, business and fairness doctrines.

Which means the debate in Congress is all wrong.

This is not about WHY Biggert-Waters is needed. We already know that answer. The NFIP was heavily in debt, so changes had to be made.

The issue should be HOW Biggert-Waters was implemented. Because it seems fairly evident that FEMA went off half-cocked.

This is an agency designed to help homeowners in crisis, and what it has actually done is created a new crisis.

So, tell me, who will save us from our saviors?

From top to bottom, FEMA has botched handling flood insurance rates 02/07/14 [Last modified: Saturday, February 8, 2014 6:13pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Judge throws out $458,000 condo sale, says Clearwater attorney tricked bidders

    Real Estate

    CLEARWATER — Pinellas County Circuit Judge Jack St. Arnold on Monday threw out the $458,100 sale of a gulf-front condo because of what he called an "unscrupulous" and "conniving" scheme to trick bidders at a foreclosure auction.

    John Houde, left, whose Orlando copany was the high  bidder June 8 at the foreclosure auction of a Redington Beach condo, looks in the direction of Clearwater lawyer and real estate investor Roy C. Skelton, foreground,  during a hearing Monday before Pinellas County Circuit Judge Jack St. Arnold.  [DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD   |   Times ]
  2. Vision Zero plan to make Hillsborough roads safer to be unveiled


    TAMPA — Vision Zero, the coalition trying to make Hillsborough County safer for bicyclists and pedestrians, is set to unveil its action plan on Tuesday morning.

    Members of the Vision Zero workshop cross Hillsborough Avenue and Kelly Road during a on-street audit of Town 'N Country roads in January. [JAMES BORCHUCK  |   Times]
  3. Pasco EDC names business incubator head in Dade City, will open second site


    Pasco County economic development officials are busy reigniting their business start-up resources following the departure earlier this year of Krista Covey, who ran the Pasco Economic Development Council's SMARTStart business incubator in Dade City.

    Andrew Romaner was promoted this summer to serve as program director of the Dade City SMARTStart Entrepreneur Center, a start-up incubator service of the Pasco Economic Development Council. He succeeds Krista Covey, who relocated to Texas for another startup position. [Courtesy of Pasco EDC]
  4. Clearwater lawyer and real estate investor Roy C. Skelton, center, attends a hearing on Monday Circuit Court Judge Jack St. Arnold at the Pinellas County Courthouse in Clearwater. The hearing was requested by attorneys representing John Houde, left, who filed a motion to invalidate the sale of a $458,000 Redington Beach condo, a deal orchestrated by Skelton, who stands accused of deliberately misleading bidders in a the June 8 foreclosure auction. [DOUGLAS R. CLIFFORD | Times]
  5. Sarasota GOP names Dick Cheney 'Statesman of the Year'


    Former Vice President Dick Cheney will be honored as "Statesman of Year" by the Sarasota GOP, a title that twice went to Donald Trump.

    Dick and Liz Cheney