Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

The battle over St. Petersburg's Pier, in boxing terms

If only it was a real fight. Then maybe this Pier vs. Lens thing would have been decided by now. Petitions wouldn't have mattered, and an upcoming court case wouldn't be necessary.

If only the judges sat in ringside seats. The results could be recorded round by round, and the scoring could be similar to the 10-point system made famous in boxing.

Then maybe we would tune in long enough to actually choose sides between the city and the gadflies.

Round 1 (March 2006)

Two studies commissioned by the city determine the pilings on the Pier have deteriorated beyond a reasonable cost of repair. Discussions begin to heat up about solutions.

"The most important piece of the puzzle and the most important question is what does the community want,'' then-council member Rick Kriseman said.

Judge's score: 10-9 for the gadflies.

Round 2 (March 2009)

The finances do not look good. The Pier costs the city roughly $1.5 million in subsidies every year, and the number of visitors is free-falling. Two times in a matter of months, the mayor asked the council to reduce rent for vendors going broke.

Studies suggest it will cost tens of millions just to renovate the existing Pier without making any substantial improvements.

"In the private sector, nobody would spend $50 million with an operating subsidy (on top of) that,'' City Council member Karl Nurse said. "Nobody in their right mind would build it. Except the government.''

Judge's score: 10-8 for the city.

Round 3 (March 2009)

Then-Mayor Rick Baker forms a 20-person task force to determine the Pier's fate, and decide how to spend $50 million previously earmarked for capital improvements. This move conveniently means the decision will be made after Baker has left office.

Shrewd move. Baker always was the smartest guy in the room.

Judge's score: 10-9 for the city.

Round 4 (June 2009)

A poll sponsored by the then-St. Petersburg Times reveals 52 percent of residents would prefer to keep the Pier open, even if the city must spend $1.5 million annually to subsidize it.

Considering the poll had a 4 percent margin of error, the results are inconclusive.

Judge's score: 10-10.

Round 5 (July 2010)

Mayor Bill Foster says the cost of building something substantial above the water far exceeds what St. Petersburg can afford. He suggests focusing on the shore land.

Council and task force members disagree and persuade Foster to change his mind.

In hindsight, Foster's initial thinking was absolutely correct.

Judge's score: 10-8 for the gadflies.

Round 6 (August 2010)

The council votes 5-3 in a straw poll to proceed with the demolition of the Pier. Reaction is mixed. Even some council members who voted in favor of demolition are not enthusiastic.

Still, the evidence suggests it is the economically prudent decision.

Judge's score: 10-9 for the city.

Round 7 (August 2010)

Task force members say a new Pier needs to be a destination spot. Something that will bring people again and again. They say restaurants and entertainment are the best bets.

"This thing needs to start at Bayshore Drive and end at the Pier,'' said former mayor and task force member Randy Wedding. "If it doesn't, it will continue to be what it is now: A long wasteland that doesn't go anywhere.''

Which is exactly what the original version of the Lens looks like.

Judge's score: 10-9 for the gadflies.

Round 8 (November 2010)

The city spends more than $400,000 to get some preliminary ideas for Pier designs from a Miami firm. Foster tells the firm's representative to "blow us away.''

Judge's score: 10-9 for the gadflies.

Round 9 (January 2012)

The architectural competition concludes with the task force choosing the Lens design, which is later approved by the City Council.

It is an artful, circular walkway above the water, with flexibility to build more on the land in the future. The Lens itself, however, will eat up all of the city's budget for waterfront construction.

The reviews are mixed, at best.

Judge's score: 10-9 for the gadflies.

Round 10 (June 2012)

The city says proposals to save the Pier are not realistic. Fixing the pilings and doing minimal upgrades to the inverted building would cost $70 million to $80 million.

Pier supporters disagree, saying renovations could be done for the same $50 million proposed for the Lens.

Whichever figure you choose to believe, it is still an outrageous and foolhardy cost to renovate an existing attraction that has seen steadily declining attendance.

Judge's score: 10-8 for the city.

And the winner is …

A 94-94 split decision.

In the end, neither side came close to a knockout.

The gadflies are absolutely wrong about the wisdom of investing so much money in a structure that is no longer an attraction to either locals or tourists.

And the city's idea to spend $50 million for something that is largely ornamental without more concrete plans for shore features is also faulty.

A rematch isn't necessary.

What this fight needs is a new contender.

The battle over St. Petersburg's Pier, in boxing terms 08/25/12 [Last modified: Saturday, August 25, 2012 8:08pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Jameis Winston, Feeding Tampa Bay to provide groceries to families hit by Hurricane Irma

    Hurricanes

    TAMPA — Tampa Bay Buccaneers quarterback Jameis Winston, Feeding Tampa Bay and the nonprofit Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa will distribute food and gift cards Tuesday to an estimated 400 families who suffered power outages and lost food after Hurricane Irma.

    Tampa Bay Bucaneers quarterback Jameis Winston, center, in green shirt, serves a meal at a disaster assistance registration center in St. Petersburg on Sept. 15. Winston has purchased 400 $25 gift cards from Publix and is scheduled to present some of them to families who lost groceries after Hurricane Irma from 4 to 6 p.m. Tuesday at the Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa at 1907 E Hillsborough Ave. in Tampa. LARA CERRI   |   Times
  2. Hot, isolated, and running out of supplies, parts of Puerto Rico near desperation

    Hurricanes

    JUNCOS, PUERTO RICO — In the heat and humidity here in the central mountains, Meryanne Aldea fanned her bedridden mother with a piece of cardboard Sunday as the ailing woman lay on her side, relieving a large ulcer in her back.

    A man walks from Juncos in search of gasoline. The mountain town is one of the most affected by Hurricane Maria's pass through Puerto Rico. [Dennis M. Rivera Pichardo | Washington Post]
  3. President Donald Trump during a rally in Huntsville, Ala., Sept. 22, 2017. Trump called for football fans to boycott NFL games unless the league fires or suspends players who refuse to stand for the national anthem.
  4. Rick and Tom podcast: Worst-Case (Keenum) scenario

    Bucs

    Rick Stroud and Tom Jones break down the Bucs' 34-17 loss to the Vikings on Sunday in Minneapolis in their latest podcast.

    Minnesota Vikings quarterback Case Keenum (7) scrambles away from Bucs defensive end William Gholston (92) during the first half. [LOREN ELLIOTT   |   Times]
  5. Tonight: Hear ideas for remaking downtown Tampa interchange

    Transportation

    TAMPA — New concepts for rebuilding the downtown interchange will be discussed at a Florida Department of Transportation community meeting Monday night.

    The Florida Department of Transportation renamed its controversial Tampa Bay Express plan, also known as TBX. The plan is now known as Tampa Bay Next, or TBN. [Florida Department of Transportation]