Make us your home page
Instagram

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Here's what we learned (and still don't know) about the Russia investigation

Former FBI Director James Comey takes his seat after being sworn in during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing Thursday on Capitol Hill in Washington. [Alex Brandon | Associated Press]

Former FBI Director James Comey takes his seat after being sworn in during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing Thursday on Capitol Hill in Washington. [Alex Brandon | Associated Press]

Six-plus hours of public testimony (and much more behind closed doors). Five witnesses. Dozens of questions. Eighteen Trump tweets.

This was a massive week for:

1) The investigation into Russia interference in the U.S. election.

2) The investigation into whether Trump's campaign helped that interference.

3) The growing investigation into whether Donald Trump tried to interfere in any of the other investigations.

This week likely marks a turning point for all those investigations. Before this week, the focus was on whether Trump's campaign colluded with Russia during the election. Revelations this week could force the FBI, the special counsel and Congress to focus their investigative (and, in the case of the special counsel, prosecutorial) powers on the president himself.

Let's review what we learned — and what we still don't know.

What we learned this week

1) The FBI director ousted by Trump seems pretty darn sure the president tried to obstruct justice.

In testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, James Comey did everything but directly accuse the president of this: "My impression was, something big is about to happen. I need to remember every single word that is spoken," Comey said.

"I was honestly concerned that he might lie about what happened, and I needed to document it," he said at another point.

However, when asked directly whether he thought Trump was trying to obstruct justice, he said special counsel Robert S. Mueller III would have to make that determination.

Why this is new: Until this point, we had never heard from Comey directly about his conversations with the president.

2) The president is going to deny two key Comey accusations. Immediately after Comey's testimony, Trump's personal lawyer for all things Russia, Marc Kasowitz, denied two key accusations:

• That Trump suggested in any way that Comey stop investigating Flynn, or anyone else

• That Trump asked Comey for loyalty

3) But Trump won't deny everything.

Trump's lawyer didn't address Comey's accusations that:

Trump lied about why he fired him. ("The president is not a liar," deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Thursday.)

Trump asked Comey repeatedly to "lift the cloud" of the Russian investigation as it relates to whether Trump was under investigation.

Trump asked top officials to leave him and Comey alone in the Oval Office, something even a GOP senator said was inappropriate.

Whether Trump did anything inappropriate or illegal.

If Trump asked top intelligence officials to push back or intervene on the FBI's probe.

Speaking of . . .

Alex Brandon | Associated Press

FBI acting director Andrew McCabe, left, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, are seated as National Intelligence Director Dan Coats, speaks, with National Security Agency director Adm. Mike Rogers, during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, June 7, in Washington.

4) Trump may have asked other intelligence chiefs to interfere, too.

In testimony Wednesday, both Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, and Adm. Mike Rogers, the head of the National Security Agency, left open the possibility that Trump asked them to push back or intervene in the FBI investigation — although they did say they didn't feel pressured to do anything about it.

Why this is new: The Washington Post had reported that Coats, Rogers and CIA Director Mike Pompeo told associates that Trump asked them to weigh in on the FBI Russia probe or to get the FBI to back off it entirely.

Given multiple opportunities to deny those reports, neither Coats nor Rogers did. (Pompeo wasn't testifying.)

They weren't forthcoming, either. The fact they wouldn't answer senators' questions about their conversations with Trump is a growing controversy in Congress.

5) The intelligence community is as certain as it can be that Russia tried to interfere in the presidential election.

I'll let Comey, who led the investigation into this, take it from here:

"The Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle," he testified Thursday. "They did with purpose. They did it with sophistication. They did it with overwhelming technical efforts. It was an active measures campaign driven from the top of that government. There is no fuzz on that."

Why this is new: Well, it's not. The U.S. intelligence agencies signed onto a report before Trump's inauguration saying as much. But some — including, at times, Trump — have questioned whether this happened. Comey did underscore that there is no evidence that any votes cast were altered by Russian hackers after the fact, though it's very possible that people changed the way they were going to vote thanks to Russia's fake news and hacking of Democratic emails.

What we still don't know

1) Whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. The FBI, working with a special counsel, and at least two committees in Congress are still looking into this.

2) Whether Trump obstructed justice. Again, too soon to say. I'll add that special counsel Mueller has wide latitude to investigate whatever he wants. And the power to prosecute for crimes, if necessary.

3) Whether investigations will shift from collusion to obstruction. It's possible, given Comey's remarkably candid and lucid testimony, that investigators in Congress and the FBI will think this is the more pressing matter. But the work of those investigations is being done behind closed doors, so we don't know for sure. Don't expect anything for months, at a minimum.

4) Why Trump fired Comey: Trump told NBC's Lester Holt in May that he fired Comey because of "this Russia thing." But it wasn't quite the smoking gun Democrats had hoped to prove obstruction of justice; Trump appeared to be saying that he thought Comey was investigating a fake connection between Trump and Russia.

As usual with Trump, there's some plausible deniability there: Did Trump fire Comey because he thought he was doing a bad job as FBI director (which is the president's prerogative)? Or did Trump fire Comey because Comey was investigating something he didn't like?

The answer to that could determine whether Trump did, indeed, obstruct justice — and where all these investigations go after this remarkable week.

Here's what we learned (and still don't know) about the Russia investigation 06/09/17 [Last modified: Friday, June 9, 2017 11:41am]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times

    

Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

Loading...
  1. Forecast: Break out those sweaters, Tampa Bay, as cooler weather just a day away

    Weather

    Tampa Bay residents will finally be able to break out their sweaters and boots this week, but not until enduring yet another humid, rainy day to start the workweek.

    Tampa Bay's 7-day forecast. [WTSP]
  2. Justin Timberlake in Super Bowl halftime show for first time since 'wardrobe malfunction'

    Celebrities

    Justin Timberlake has finally been invited back to the Super Bowl halftime show, 14 years after the "wardrobe malfunction" with Janet Jackson caused a national controversy.

    Singer Janet Jackson covers her breast as Justin Timberlake holds part of her costume after her outfit came undone during the halftime show of Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston in 2004. The NFL announced Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017, that Timberlake will headline the Super Bowl halftime show Feb. 4 in Minnesota, 14 years after the "wardrobe malfunction" with Janet Jackson cause a national controversy. [Associated Press]
  3. Here's what happened when 30 high school sophomores gave up their phones for a day

    K12

    LUTZ — They were everywhere at Steinbrenner High School. Teens with panic-stricken faces, furiously slapping one thigh, then the other.

    Grace Hayes, 15, left, and Kai'Rey Lewis, 15, talk and text friends after having a discussion about smartphone technology in Tiffany Southwell's English Literature class at Steinbrenner High last week. Southwell asked theme to give up their phones for a day and write about it. For Lewis, the ride home that day "was the longest bus ride in my life." [OCTAVIO JONES   |   Times]
  4. Cuban media treats visit by Tampa City Council as historic event

    Politics

    TAMPA — Delegations of one kind or another have been traveling from Tampa to Cuba for years, even before President Barack Obama took steps to normalize relations between the two countries in December 2014.

    A Tampa delegation to Cuba this week was featured prominently in reports by the state-run media in Cuba, including Granma. From left are Tampa City Council vice chair Harry Cohen, St. Petersburg City Council Chair Darden Rice, Tampa philanthropist David Straz and Tampa City Council Chair Yolie Capin.
  5. As the curtain rises on the Straz Center's biggest shows, the spotlight is on parking

    Transportation

    TAMPA — The Broadway Series, the most lucrative shows of the year for the David A. Straz Jr. Center for the Performing Arts, start this week, and this year the center wants all the drama to take place on stage, not during the drive to the theater.

    With downtown Tampa getting busier at night and on weekends, city officials and administrators from the David A. Straz Jr. Center for the Performing Arts have been working on ways to unsnarl traffic and help visitors find parking when there are lots of events at the same time. CHRIS ZUPPA   |   Times (2009)