Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy) | Tampa Bay Times
Sorting out the truth in politics

PolitiFact: The facts on the health care law, birth control and the Catholic Church

Is President Barack Obama's administration requiring the Catholic Church to provide birth control coverage to nuns?

As rhetoric rises in a clash between Catholic leaders and the federal government over a rule requiring copay-free coverage of contraceptives in most health plans, here's a guide.

What the rule says

The newly final rule stems from the Affordable Care Act of 2010 — what Republican presidential candidates call "Obamacare." It affects the health plans employers offer their employees. Among its requirements is that most plans include birth control coverage without out-of-pocket costs. But it's part of a broader push to provide preventive care without extra fees.

Preventive services: The law requires most health plans to cover recommended preventive services without copays or deductibles. But the law left to the administration to decide which women's health services to include.

Birth control and sterilization: The Health and Human Services Department guidelines say preventive services must include all birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administration, plus sterilization. FDA-approved birth control includes everything from physical methods such as condoms, diaphragms, cervical caps and intrauterine devices — IUDs — to hormonal methods such as the pill, implants and hormone shots.

It includes emergency contraceptives such as Plan B and Ella, which prevent fertilization of an egg or the implantation of a fertilized egg, though not so-called "abortion drugs" like RU-486 that end an early pregnancy by blocking the activity of progesterone.

What the administration did

The Obama administration carved out a religious exemption for most churches and some parochial schools. But it's unlikely to apply to a range of other church-affiliated organizations such as hospitals, universities and charities. The guidelines, suggested by the Health and Human Services Department in August 2011, were made final over Catholic organizations' objections on Jan. 20.

What the Catholic Church says

According to the teachings of the Catholic Church, any contraceptive violates moral law. In 1968, Pope Paul VI spelled it out. Any act specifically intended to prevent getting pregnant — other than timing sex for the infertile part of a woman's cycle — is unlawful, he wrote. Not only that, it was "an evil thing," he said, to make it easy to break moral law.

That puts Catholic organizations in a tough spot. If contraceptives must be offered without a co-pay, that means the cost is spread among employers and all insured employees whether they use the coverage or not, bishops argue. Catholics would end up paying for birth control, breaking moral law.

So the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is leading the political charge to overturn the administration's decision. A religious exemption that applies primarily to churches is too narrow, bishops argue. Two Catholic colleges have sued; new laws have been proposed in Congress; and bishops are urging parishioners to write to lawmakers.

A quarter of the U.S. population is Catholic. That's not to say all Catholics oppose the Obama administration's rule. A Guttmacher Institute study based on government data shows that most Catholic women use birth control at some point in their lives, nearly the same as all women. Meanwhile, two recent polls show a slim majority of Catholics favor the rule.

Sticking point

So, about that religious exemption, which Catholic bishops argue is too narrow. Here's how it works: Organizations have to meet a four-part test for what the government calls "a religious employer." It's not simple to say which types of religious organizations will have to offer copay-free birth control coverage, and which won't, because it depends.

The test: A religious employer:

• Is a nonprofit organization

• Has the inculcation of religious values as its purpose

• Primarily employs persons who share its religious tenets

• Primarily serves persons who share its religious tenets

Case by case: It hasn't yet been decided how that test will be applied, though it will likely be case by case. That will come with final HHS rules on the larger issue of preventive care later this year. Meanwhile, nonprofits that haven't offered birth control because of religious beliefs have an extra year to comply with the new rule — by Aug. 1, 2013, instead of this summer.

How rule might apply

Catholic nun working in a Catholic church: Assuming the church primarily employs and serves other Catholics, it wouldn't be required to offer coverage for birth control to its employees, including nuns.

Jewish classroom aide at a Catholic primary school: A Catholic primary school that employs primarily Catholic instructors and teaches mostly Catholic kids wouldn't have to offer contraceptive coverage to its employees, so this aide, no matter her religion, wouldn't get copay-free birth control unless her school decided to offer that coverage.

Catholic custodian at Catholic primary school: On the other hand, if a Catholic primary school hired diverse employees and taught non-Catholic kids alongside Catholic ones, it would have to offer copay-free coverage. A Catholic worker would have the option to get birth control without paying extra.

Atheist office worker at a Catholic university: A Catholic university that hires based on merit rather than religion and admits students of all faiths would have to offer contraceptive coverage — for its Catholic employees along with its non-Catholic employees.

Catholic nun working as a Catholic hospital administrator: A Catholic woman who works as an administrator for a Catholic hospital that employs and serves non-Catholics would have coverage that included copay-free birth control. So, yes, even nuns with employer-provided health care would have birth control coverage.

What if non-exempt organizations say no?

Some Catholic leaders, such as Bishop Robert Lynch of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, have said that if the rules don't change, they'll stop offering employee health coverage in protest. Lynch said he might stop providing health care for his diocese's 2,300 employees, offering cash to cover premiums instead.

What would happen? Well, the law doesn't require employers to offer health insurance. But starting in 2014, if their employees qualify for premium tax credits to buy their own insurance, available to low- and middle-income people, employers must pay a $2,000 assessment per full-time employee past the first 30 employees.

Meanwhile, their employees would find that most available health plans would be required to cover contraception.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described two birth control methods. Plan B and Ella may prevent implantation of a fertilized egg as well as prevent fertilization. RU-486 ends an early pregnancy after a fertilized egg has implanted. Also, an earlier reference to poll results incorrectly described those polled. It should have said among "Catholics."

Nelson breaks with Obama on exemption

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., says he called three White House officials to express disapproval with the controversial contraception rule.

"My position is that church-affiliated organizations should be exempt, not just churches," Nelson said. He joins an emerging group of Democrats who are opposing President Barack Obama on the issue.

But Nelson does not support Sen. Marco Rubio's bill to reverse the decision. Adds Nelson spokesman Dan McLaughlin: "The federal government already is making an exception for churches. And Sen. Nelson thinks there should be an exception for church-affiliated organizations. … At the same time, he wants to make sure women's health is protected. He feels there has to be way to do both of these things. "

Alex Leary, Times Staff Writer

PolitiFact: The facts on the health care law, birth control and the Catholic Church 02/09/12 [Last modified: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:31pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Jordan Spieth wins British Open (w/ video)


    SOUTHPORT, England — Someday, perhaps soon, there will be a plaque at Royal Birkdale for Jordan Spieth, much like the one off the 16th hole that celebrates Arnold Palmer and the 6-iron he slashed out of the rough in 1961 to win the British Open and usher in a new era of golf.

    Matt Kuchar plays out of the bunker on the 18th hole and finishes with bogey for 1-under 69. He had a one-shot lead after 13 holes.
  2. Fennelly: Brutal weekend could be start of something worse for Rays

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — Well, that was lovely.

    Brad Boxberger suffers his second loss in the three-game series, this time by allowing back-to-back homers in the eighth inning when called on to protect a 5-3 lead. “Just bad pitches,” he says.
  3. Wesley Chapel hockey camp impresses youth players, parents

    Lightning Strikes

    WESLEY CHAPEL — As a 17-year-old Triple-A hockey player, MacCallum Brown regularly plays against elite talent. As a Palm Harbor resident, he often has to travel to face that talent.

  4. Rays claim not to be panicking after third straight brutal loss to Rangers (w/ video)

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — There was no "here we go again" moment in the dugout as Rougned Odor's two-run homer in the eighth inning arced across Tropicana Field and toward the rightfield seats, even though when it landed, the score was tied and another late-inning Rays lead was blown.

    Rays third baseman Evan Longoria heads back to the dugout after fouling out in the ninth inning with the potential tying run on first.
  5. White House signals acceptance of Russia sanctions bill


    WASHINGTON — The White House indicated Sunday that President Donald Trump would accept new legislation imposing sanctions on Russia and curtailing his authority to lift them on his own, a striking turnaround after a broad revolt in Congress by lawmakers of both parties who distrusted his friendly approach to …

    President Donald Trump’s ability to lift sanctions against Russia would be blocked.