Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

PunditFact: Do 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for him in 2012? Nope

For President Barack Obama's opponents, word of his latest downfall was stunning and welcome.

Headlines and tweets all said just about the same eyebrow-raising thing: "Poll: 71% of Obama supporters 'regret' voting for his reelection."

The purported statistic from a poll was the focus of a Washington Examiner post last week that spread quickly through conservative blogs, social media, radio and online forums. Tweets about the news by big guns like Fox & Friends and various accounts with smaller reach were hard to miss.

But the news is wrong. PunditFact, a Tampa Bay Times project to fact-check the talking heads, is here to explain. Let's start at the beginning. did not even mention the news about regretful Obama voters in its Feb. 17 report of a new poll.

The story that accompanied the poll, headlined "Mitt Romney's phantom campaign," explored whether Romney is viewed more favorably ahead of the 2016 presidential election given more positive media buzz about a Netflix documentary about him. (The answer, based on their polling data, is not really.)

YouGov polled about 1,000 voters over two days in early February, asking voters for Romney and Obama if they would make the same decision today that they did in November 2012. YouGov found 90 percent of Romney voters would vote for Romney again, while 79 percent of Obama voters said they would stick with Obama.

Of the remaining 2012 Obama voters, 10 percent said they would not vote for him again, and 11 percent said they were unsure. The 10 percent who would not vote for him again got a follow-up question: Do you regret voting for Obama?

Of 35 people in that group, 25 said yes. That's 71 percent.

In the eyes of YouGov assistant editor William Jordan, this was not worth mentioning in the original report.

"We did not think it surprising that the small number of voters who said they would no longer vote for Obama now regretted voting for him," he said.

The next day, Washington Examiner columnist Paul Bedard published a story (since updated) that picked up on the people who said they regret voting for Obama.

"Over seven in 10 Obama voters, and 55 percent of Democrats, regret voting for President Obama's re-election in 2012, according to a new Economist/ poll," he wrote. (The Economist has collaborated with YouGov in past polls, but not this one.)

Those words sprung to life, appearing on the Drudge Report, spreading across Twitter, and landing on sites like and World Net Daily. It seeped into partisan radio broadcasts, including on Rush Limbaugh's show, and even a San Diego morning TV show.

Conservative blog Hot Air was the exception. It urged its readers to ignore stories about the 71 percent statistic.

Why? YouGov, while correctly reporting its sample sizes and percentages in its tables, left off an important disclaimer in describing who got the question. No one realized it until someone asked about it the day after posting the results.

The description about the "regrets" question should have said, "Asked of those who reported voting for Barack Obama in 2012 but would not vote for him if the election was held again."

Instead it said, "Asked of those who voted for Barack Obama in 2012." That language suggests a sample size of 396 voters, not 35.

"The 71 percent who regretted voting for Obama, which was picked up by various media outlets, is of the 3.5 percent (35 of 999 respondents) of the sample who said they voted for Obama in 2012 and would not vote for him today," Jordan said.

YouGov fixed its truncated filter. Bedard, at the Examiner, rewrote parts of his story and changed the headline to "Poll: Only 79% of Obama voters would vote for him again."

But there's no recall button for bad information on the Internet.

Surveys require a great deal of attention from pollsters and reporters alike, especially ones with political overtones, said Karlyn Bowman, a polling analyst at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. As the sample size shrinks, the margin of error rate expands.

Point being, while the overall YouGov poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.8 percentage points, the question about regret would have a much higher margin of error.

"You've got to be really careful when you're looking at subsamples of subsamples of subsamples," Bowman said.

In this case, that didn't happen. We rate this claim Pants on Fire.

Read more rulings at

The statement

A poll shows 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for him.

Bloggers, Feb. 18 in conservative blogs

The ruling

Politifact ruling: Pants on Fire
The number is wildly high, based on incomplete wording in a poll report and a less-than-perfect reading of that report by news organizations. We rate this claim Pants on Fire.

YouGov survey by the numbers

The poll started with a sample size of 999. The pool of respondents shrunk with follow-up questions. We'll focus on the Obama-centric questions, which are most relevant to this fact-check.

Which candidate did you vote for in the presidential election? (Asked to 803 people who voted)

Obama (51 percent), Romney (43 percent), Someone else (6 percent)

If the election were held again, would you still vote for Barack Obama? (Asked to 396 people who voted for Obama in 2012)

Yes (79 percent), No (10 percent), Not sure (11 percent)

Do you regret voting for Barack Obama? (Asked to 35 people who voted for Obama in 2012 but would not for him if the election were held again)

Yes (71 percent), No (26 percent), Not sure (3 percent)

PunditFact: Do 71 percent of Obama voters regret voting for him in 2012? Nope 02/27/14 [Last modified: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:54pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Tampa Bay Super Bowls: A brief history and some predictions for 2021


    At last, Tampa will host a Super Bowl again. It used to be that the Cigar City would host one a decade, but by the time February 2021 rolls around, it will have been 12 years since the epic showdown between the Steelers and Cardinals. Because it has been awhile, let's revisit those past Super Bowls while also peering …

    Santonio Holmes hauls in the game-winning touchdown in the Steelers' 27-23 Super Bowl XLIII victory over the Cardinals in 2009, the last time Tampa hosted a Super Bowl. [JAMES BORCHUCK | Times]
  2. Rays bats go silent in second straight loss to Angels (w/video)

    The Heater

    ST. PETERSBURG — Sure, Alex Cobb was to blame for the Rays' 4-0 loss on Tuesday.

    Derek Norris strikes out with the bases loaded as the Rays blow a golden opportunity in the seventh inning.
  3. Analysis: Manchester attack was exactly what many had long feared


    LONDON — For Britain's security agencies, London always seemed like the likely target. For years, the capital of 8 million with hundreds of thousands of weekly tourists and dozens of transit hubs had prepared for and feared a major terror attack.

  4. Dade City man dies after crashing into county bus, troopers say

    Public Safety

    ZEPHYRHILLS — A 38-year-old man died Tuesday after colliding into the rear of a county bus on U.S. 301, the Florida Highway Patrol said.

  5. Suspicious device at Pinellas Park home was a spent artillery round, police say

    Public Safety

    PINELLAS PARK — Bomb squad investigators determined that a "suspicious device" found at a Pinellas Park home Tuesday afternoon was a spent artillery round, police said.