Make us your home page

Today’s top headlines delivered to you daily.

(View our Privacy Policy)

Sen. Marco Rubio: Let's be 'realistic' and ditch comprehensive immigration reform

Conservatives have criticized Marco Rubio for his role in shaping the Senate deal.

Conservatives have criticized Marco Rubio for his role in shaping the Senate deal.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Marco Rubio, who helped write the Senate's comprehensive immigration reform bill, has shifted back to his original position that piecemeal legislation is the way forward.

"We've been lectured for the better part of a month now how we need to be realistic, that Barack Obama was not going to repeal Obamacare," Rubio said in an interview with the Tampa Bay Times. "Likewise, I think supporters of immigration reform need to be realistic. The House is just not going to jump on board for whatever the Senate passes."

That's been evident for months. But in recent interviews the Florida Republican has sounded more distant from the Senate legislation. On CNN on Friday, a casual viewer could have assumed that he had nothing to do with it — as he referred to "whatever the Democrats in the Senate are demanding."

Rubio even opposes using the Senate bill as a negotiating point in a conference if the House can manage to pass a limited bill.

"Any effort to use a limited bill as a ruse to trigger a conference that would then produce a comprehensive bill would be counterproductive. Furthermore, any such effort would fail because any single senator can and will block conference unless such conference is specifically instructed to limit the conference to only the issue dealt with in the underlying bill," Rubio spokesman Alex Conant told Breit­bart News.

Politically, there is truth to what Rubio says. The House is a sticking point. Even the White House has softened demands for one big bill, though the president still wants a comprehensive approach.

Rubio says he is just reflecting reality. Yet the signals he is sending also reflect the damage he has suffered from his involvement in the Senate deal, which provides a path to citizenship for millions of people, provided they pay fines and wait more than a decade.

Before he joined the Gang of 8, Rubio said he wanted a piecemeal approach.

"Usually, when Congress approaches issues of this magnitude with one big bill, it almost always requires you to swallow five really bad ideas in exchange for one good one," he told the Times in December 2012.

Yet his views changed as he joined the bipartisan group — eagerly enough that he scooped his colleagues on the news. Rubio came to see that you couldn't do one thing — more border enforcement, for example — without addressing the 11 million people here illegally.

Still, after the Senate bill passed in June, Rubio more or less dropped out of view. Prospects of getting something done are grim, despite growing outside pressure on the House, including a blitz this week when 600 conservatives will descend on Capitol Hill in a call for action. House Democrats have introduced a bill that resembles what the Senate passed, minus the so-called border surge, and California Rep. Jeff Denham just became the first Republican to embrace it.

Now comes Rubio.

"A comprehensive approach and a comprehensive bill are two separate things," he told the Tampa Bay Times on Friday. "A comprehensive approach means you ultimately solve all the problems involving immigrating. And I ultimately think we have to solve all the problems because they are interrelated. A comprehensive bill is one that tries to do it all at once.

"You could theoretically come up with a bill that does it all, and does it all well. But realistically, given the environment we're in now, especially, the only chance of success on immigration may be a series of bills that build on each other."

Sen. Marco Rubio: Let's be 'realistic' and ditch comprehensive immigration reform 10/28/13 [Last modified: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:32pm]
Photo reprints | Article reprints

© 2017 Tampa Bay Times


Join the discussion: Click to view comments, add yours

  1. Still worried about family, Tampa Bay Puerto Ricans ramp up relief effort


    TAMPA — Brenda Irizarry is worried.

    Brenda Irizarry of Tampa, while agonizing over the status of family in storm-ravaged Puerto Rico, is helping lead an effort to collect and send supplies to the island. [ALESSANDRA DA PRA  |   Times
  2. Was it a crime? 10 patients at nursing home died after Irma


    HOLLYWOOD, Fla. (AP) — A 10th elderly patient has died after being kept inside a nursing home that turned into a sweatbox when Hurricane Irma knocked out its air conditioning for three days, even though just across the street was a fully functioning and cooled hospital.

    The Rehabilitation Center of Hollywood Hills, 1200 N. 35th Ave. [EMILHY MICHOT | Miami Herald]
  3. Oh, Florida! Irma's gone, but she left behind plenty of lessons for us


    I don't want to make light of the misery and death that Hurricane Irma inflicted on Florida this month. A lot of it was ugly, and some of it was downright criminal. We saw greed and pettiness on display, and it brought illness and death.

    Tampa Bay Times staff writer Craig Pittman.
  4. 'Toxic' times: How repeal of Florida's tax on services reverberates, 30 years later

    State Roundup

    TALLAHASSEE — Long before Hurricane Irma attacked Florida, the state faced a troubled fiscal future that the storm will only make worse.

    Robertson says the tax debate is now “toxic.”
  5. Facebook to release Russia ads to Congress amid pressure

    NEW YORK (AP) — Facebook will provide the contents of 3,000 ads bought by a Russian agency to congressional investigators.