Detours: a country in search of direction
On the eve of the election, a reporter and photographer set out for Washington, via America. We tell stories from seven towns, touching on seven issues from politics and real life.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Game show themes
These themes are probably going to make some of you have flashbacks to wasted mornings or afternoons spent sprawled in front of the TV.
TALLAHASSEE — The cost for a controversial commuter rail project in Orlando has jumped more than $150-million.
Instead of $491-million announced in August 2006, the state estimates it will spend about $650-million. The state said it had grossly underestimated, at $59-million, the cost of constructing five overpasses as part of the deal. Instead, the state will need to spend $203-million.
The overpasses are part of a complex deal Florida struck with CSX railroad. The state has agreed to pay CSX $150-million for 61.5 miles of railroad through urban Orlando to use for commuter rail. The remaining money will be spent to help improve other CSX lines and facilities, including overpasses in Alachua, Sumter and Marion counties.
The cost increases provided new ammunition for the project's opponents.
"It's amazing. We're in the tightest budget year in 10 years, and they just keep finding money," said Sen. Paula Dockery, R-Lakeland.
Florida Department of Transportation officials said the $59-million was slated before the projects had studies to set costs. In at least one case, a report was done in 1998 and lacked up to date cost information.
The projects use a mix of state transportation funding.
Senate Majority Leader Dan Webster, R-Winter Garden, downplayed the increase, saying the bigger issue is whether Florida would commit to improving rail lines for commuters and freight — and more efficient transportation.
David DeCamp can be reached at ddecamp@sptimes.com or (850) 224-7263.
[Last modified: Mar 26, 2008 08:58 PM]
Comments on this article
by JT
Mar 26, 2008 8:58 PM
The appropriate response is NO, not with the taxpayers money.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.