|
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Debate over religious funding goes to voters
By
Alex Leary, Times Staff Writer
In print: Thursday, March 27, 2008
TALLAHASSEE — A powerful Florida commission thrust itself into the debate over the separation of church and state Wednesday when it agreed to ask voters to remove a century-old limit on funding for religious groups.
The November ballot measure will ask voters to remove a provision from the state Constitution that a court used in 2004 to strike down former Gov. Jeb Bush's controversial school voucher program, which funneled money to parochial schools.
Supporters, led by the head of Bush's education foundation, contend that removing the "Blaine Amendment" would protect the state's use of religious providers for programs such as drug treatment and faith-based prisons.
But critics, including some religious leaders, blasted the commission's 17-7 vote — just enough to place the measure on the ballot — saying it could result in a dangerous revision to the state Constitution.
The Anti-Defamation League called the move unprecedented in the United States, "as it would be the first constitutionally mandated faith-based initiative without any antidiscrimination or religious freedom safeguards."
The 25-member Taxation and Budget Reform Commission also voted to place on the November ballot a tax break for waterfront businesses such as marinas and boat repair shops. The measure would not, however, help mom-and-pop hotels that dot the Tampa Bay area coast.
"We're the ones who were crying out about property taxes," said Katrena Hale-Claver, owner of Sand Glo Villas on Indian Shores. "This is ludicrous. They don't give a rat's fanny about us."
Lee County Appraiser Ken Wilkinson, a member of the commission, said the measure was narrowly crafted to capture marinas, dry docks, boat repair facilities and waterfront uses. He said it was difficult to define what kind of hotel would qualify and noted concern about including ritzy South Beach resorts.
Wilkinson said small hotels could receive protection from an earlier measure approved by the panel — a recommendation for the Legislature to adopt such protections. But that's not guaranteed.
Both measures that passed Wednesday need 60 percent voter approval in November to become law.
Wednesday's action came in an eight-hour meeting that was also notable for what the panel did not do: consider a plan to scale back the class size requirements voters approved in 2002.
That plan is no longer in play and appears to have been abandoned as a trade-off for the hard-fought passage of the religious funding proposal.
The issue is rooted in a 2004 appellate court decision that tossed Bush's voucher program, known as "Opportunity Scholarships." It allowed students at poor-performing public schools to attend parochial or other private schools at taxpayer expense.
As justification, the court pointed to a "no aid" provision that has appeared in the state Constitution since 1885. Many other states adopted similar restrictions, named after former U.S. House Speaker James Blaine, and they were viewed as intentionally oppressive toward Catholics.
Commissioner Patricia Levesque of Tallahassee, a former Bush aide who now heads his foundation, cast her plan as righting a vestige of religious discrimination.
More directly, she said she feared the 2004 court ruling, known as Bush vs. Holmes, could be used to attack other religious-based programs that currently receive public funding despite the constitutional ban, such as prekindergarten programs.
To remove any doubt, Levesque's plan inserts into the Constitution the following: "Individuals or entities may not be barred from participating in public programs because of their religion."
Critics said that was overkill, unnecessary and represents a dangerous encroachment on the separation of church and state, while broadening the scope of groups that can get state funding or seek state contracts. No one faulted current programs that get state aid, but they said the ballot language opens the door for more direct use of taxpayer money for overtly religious reasons.
"We Baptists have always believed that religion should be voluntary and government should not promote or fund religion," testified Harry Parrott Jr., a minister formerly of St. Petersburg.
Larry Spaulding of the ACLU of Florida called it "government- funded proselytizing," echoing concern from others that drug addicts and other vulnerable people could fall under pressure to join a certain religion.
Commissioner John McKay of Bradenton joined others who said the panel should not be delving into the issue. He worries that having it on the ballot could hurt other tax measures the panel has placed before voters. His opposition comes even though while he was Senate president he was the author of another voucher plan that provides some disabled children state-funded tuition to a private school.
"I didn't see a single person who said they wanted us to address this issue," McKay said of public hearings the panel held last year to gather ideas.
But Levesque and her allies argued that it was a matter of state finance and that the charity programs could be jeopardized, hurting an important safety net for the poor and troubled.
Bush vs. Holmes "is the law the land," argued Commissioner Richard Corcoran of Tallahassee. "And those great programs are at risk."
The Florida Supreme Court also eventually rejected the voucher program, but on different grounds: That the state Constitution calls for a uniform system of free public schools.
A separate proposal before the commission Wednesday aimed at fixing that problem but was postponed until next week.
Ron Meyer, the teachers union attorney who brought the lawsuit against the voucher program, said supporters should expect fierce opposition leading up to November's vote: "There are many, many different groups — religious groups, education groups — that are going to make certain that the people understand what they're doing here."
Bush could not be reached for comment Wednesday.
[Last modified: Apr 04, 2008 05:16 PM]
Comments on this article
|
by Roger
|
Apr 1, 2008 4:41 PM
|
|
No one would force people to send their children to religious based schools. However, as it is now, you are required to fund sending children to atheist based schools. I see nothing wrong with letting people choose where to spend their eduacation $
|
|
by Phil
|
Mar 28, 2008 1:40 PM
|
|
This is not a christian nation nor did the founders of this country ever intended it to be one. Article 11 of the 1797 Treaty with Tripoli "The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.&qu
|
|
by jason
|
Mar 28, 2008 8:51 AM
|
|
Whoa, stop molesting the constitution. Idiocracy personified.
|
|
by Jocephus
|
Mar 28, 2008 8:51 AM
|
|
Just because the majority of US citizens are Christian doesn't mean this is a Christian nation. God and Jesus must come dead last where government is concerned, along with every other faith.
|
|
by Tom
|
Mar 28, 2008 8:49 AM
|
|
Too many tax-exempt charities already have their hand out for more taxpayer cash.
|
|
by Steve
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:20 PM
|
|
What is it with Florida and voter referenda? Does the constitution ever get left alone for a year or two? Every time an important (or unimportant) issue arises, our "leaders" in Tallahassee go whining for a referendum rather tha
|
|
by Calvin
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:15 PM
|
|
So what happens to the state coffers if this passes and suddenly everyone wants their tax money back to fund their children's religious education? Chaos is what. Think there's not enuf $$ now? Just wait til this passes.
|
|
by Sally
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:14 PM
|
|
Hey Faith is First, what abortion doctor is funded with public money? NONE. Get a life and leave the rest of us alone. BTW, I don't see anything in the bible about abortion. When did Jesus say it was wrong. Again, NEVER!
|
|
by DCS
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:07 PM
|
|
We were not founded as a Christian nation. God, Jesus nor christianity is never mentioned in the Constitution The Deceleration of Independence only mentions the "Natures God". They did not acknowledge man as subservient to god!
|
|
by David S
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:06 PM
|
|
Thank god the Scientologist will finally get government funding for their drug treatment programs. And I am glad that the Arab community center will get tax supported funding for the youth programs!
|
|
by Faith First
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:05 PM
|
|
Thank you for all the lively discussion. Just remember that this is ONE NATION UNDER GOD. Our founding Fathers were Christians. Therefore, our nation is founded on Judeo-Christian principles. Anything else is purely a fascist or communist constr
|
|
by Jon
|
Mar 27, 2008 3:01 PM
|
|
We should remove tax exemptions for churches. Why do churches pay no property taxes?
|
|
by kevin
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:59 PM
|
|
Our Federal Constitution protects the people, even just one person, from majority rule on this issue; this cannot constitutionally be presented to the voters.
|
|
by Ed
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:56 PM
|
|
Comparing "abortion doctors" and "planned parenthood" with organized religion is so ludicrous it's almost laughable. This is yet another example of how leaders of this state are diverting our attention from issues that actua
|
|
by Taxpayer
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:52 PM
|
|
In their eagerness to legislate morality or get their hands on some of that gov't pork, the religious right often forgets that the separation of church and state protects them. Do they really want to be told what they are allowed to do in churc
|
|
by Non Christian
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:48 PM
|
|
Of course all of the money would be given to Christian orgs ignoring all other religions because as Faith is First says "This is a Christian Nation"...It is NOT, it is a nation of many religions. You Christians need to remember not all thin
|
|
by dB
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:46 PM
|
|
Thanks, Commission. It is time we provided public funds for the Church of Scientology's outreach!
|
|
by Greg
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:43 PM
|
|
Speak for yourself Faith is First...you are entitled to your beliefs, but you do not decide what others think or do!
|
|
by VOR
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:11 PM
|
|
By design the sep of church&state was meant to keep Govt from mandating religious bias and profiting from religion. Hence the tax exempt status granted to churches. But neither should the govt fund any religious group. leave it like it is. vote n
|
|
by D
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:05 PM
|
|
Whoa, "Faith Is First," last I checked, the people who came to this country were looking to escape religious persecution. The nation was founded on the precept "all men are created equal," not just those who hold God and Jesus in
|
|
by Bob G
|
Mar 27, 2008 2:02 PM
|
|
TO: Paul !!People dont want to segregate their children; they just want an Education for them;
I pay taxes so if I am not geting what i pay for then I should not have to pay taxes; or give me a voucher;
|
|
by Kris
|
Mar 27, 2008 1:58 PM
|
|
If there is going to be an opening to allow for taxpayer dollars to go to religious orgs because we won't support our social services enough, then I hope they are ready for lawsuits from other non-christian religions that should have the sa
|
|
by Ed
|
Mar 27, 2008 1:56 PM
|
|
Abortion doctors are not publicly funded, they haven't been since Reagan. And neither should any faith-based initiative be publicly funded.
|
|
by David
|
Mar 27, 2008 1:56 PM
|
|
Remember when programs had to prove their worth and go out and beat the bushes for their funding? I know it is easier to just let the taxpayer do it but shouldn't be be looking to fund less with tax dollars ......... not more?
|
|
by Allan
|
Mar 27, 2008 1:52 PM
|
|
The Florida Christian Taliban is at it again. These Christian Protestant Taliban totalitarians ought to move to Iran or Afghanistan if they like this kind of anti-Jeffersonian interference of their sectarian religious fairytales into public pol
|
|
by Faith Is First
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:58 AM
|
|
If abortion doctors can be publicly funded, then faith-based initiatives should as well. This is a Christian nation. God and Jesus must always come first. No exceptions. No excuses.
|
|
by JT
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:34 AM
|
|
Good work, it is about time religious institutions are not discriminated against. If the funding for planned parenthood can somehow be provided and not used for objectionable purposes then so can funding for the local Church social outreach program!
|
|
by geezer
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:34 AM
|
|
They have worded that so cleverly that it's going to take a lot of education of the public to defeat it. It's a slippery slope we're seeing here.
|
|
by William
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:28 AM
|
|
If you want a perfect example of why Church and State should never be mixed............look at Iran, Irag and any other middle east country. They don't don't tolerate anything other than Islam and persecute other religious faiths in their
|
|
by Pete
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:28 AM
|
|
If this passes then all churchs should loose their tax free status. No more getting public money and not having to pay taxes Make all churchs pay a tax like the rest of the world does instead of funding their own greed
|
|
by Will
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:26 AM
|
|
My, my, back when the Times opposed Amendment 1 it justified that partially because the Taxation Committee would come to our rescue...those voting for the Amendment knew the Times was full of it; as this proves in print.
|
|
by Paul
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:18 AM
|
|
I don't want my tax dollars supporting ignorance and superstition. If people want to segregate their children let them do it at their own expense.
|
|
by darb
|
Mar 27, 2008 9:04 AM
|
|
Republicans never stop trying to dismantle the Department of Education.
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|