Multimedia report
Owning vs. renting
The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
- More multimedia reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
Voters will have say on tax cut in November
By
Alex Leary, Times Staff Writer
In print: Friday, April 25, 2008
TALLAHASSEE — Florida voters will decide in November whether to cut property taxes by about 25 percent through a dramatic shift in the way schools are funded. But the plan would lead to a higher state sales tax and put lawmakers under immense pressure to replace billions in lost school taxes. It was placed on the ballot Thursday by a powerful tax commission. "This is our opportunity to give Floridians the opportunity to improve and modernize their tax system," said lead sponsor John McKay, who serves on the Taxation and Budget Reform Commission. But opposition was already mounting Thursday, suggesting a deeply funded campaign to defeat the measure is in the making. Business groups pilloried the idea as a danger to the economy, not only through a 1 cent or more sales tax increase, but also because it raises the possibility of taxing services, such as for lawyers and accountants. The measure could also lead to the repeal of some special interests' sales tax exemptions. "I'm 99 percent certain someone will sue" over the way the commission adopted the plan, said Barney Bishop, president of Associated Industries of Florida. "This is a bad, bad proposal," said Randy Miller of the Florida Retail Federation and a tax commission member. The plan needs 60 percent voter approval in November and would not go into effect until 2011. Only days ago, Miller and a legion of other critics appeared to be succeeding in turning support against the plan, which the commission had already given preliminary approval last month by a 21-4 vote. On Thursday, the final vote was 18-7, just one more than the 17 votes needed. It appeared McKay, a former Senate president from Bradenton, may have shored up support for his plan by agreeing to back a controversial school voucher plan that will be voted on today. McKay had previously helped vote down the plan — a move that angered other commissioners partly because there is a voucher program for disabled children that bears McKay's name. McKay voted with others Thursday to reconsider the voucher proposal. If placed on the ballot and approved by voters, it would negate a provision in the state Constitution requiring a "uniform system of free public schools." The Florida Supreme Court cited the clause in 2006 when it tossed former Gov. Jeb Bush's Opportunity Scholarships. McKay denied a quid pro quo was at work. He said he did not fully understand the voucher program before. The so-called tax swap would replace most school property taxes — the part referred to as the "required local effort" — and give the Legislature guidance in how to replace the loss revenue, estimated between $9-billion and $11-billion. The plan includes language requiring that schools be "held harmless" and a formula for growth in funding. Options for replacement money include a 1-cent sales tax increase (raising $4-billion, at best), elimination of existing sales tax exemptions, budget cuts and other revenue sources. There is some disagreement whether "other" could mean another penny sales tax increase. Commission member Mike Hogan, who was one of three to change his earlier support for the plan, called the provision a "bait and switch" on voters who might think the sales tax would go up only a penny. The current statewide sales tax is 6 percent. More worrisome to some is that the plan could lead to a tax on services. However, it would not apply to real estate fees or stock transactions. The state tried to impose a services tax in 1987 but quickly backed off in the firestorm that followed. Sen. Mike Haridopolos, R-Melbourne, who will likely lead the Senate in 2010 when the funding plan must be adopted, attacked it from all angles in the past few weeks. An analysis by Senate budget staffers shows that there would be a more than $3-billion hole even after other revenue sources are accounted for. But the analysis ignores savings that could be achieved by cutting the budget and the possibility of a higher sales tax. "I didn't come to Tallahassee to raise taxes," Haridopolos said, adding he will "aggressively" campaign to defeat the proposal. Advocates say the services tax argument is a red herring, pointing out that the Legislature currently can impose one but knows how radioactive that would be. "It doesn't do anything to say there is a services tax or put it into the Constitution," said commissioner Jim Scott, another former Senate president. As an incentive at the polls, the plan also provides a 5 percent assessment cap for nonhomestead property. Amendment 1, another round of property tax cuts voters approved in January, set the cap at 10 percent. "We need to let the people of Florida decide this issue for themselves," said commission member Carlos Lacasa, a former legislator from Miami. "They know what the stakes are. And they also know what the benefits are."
. fast facts Ballot language Introduction: Eliminating state required school property tax and replacing with equivalent state revenues to fund education: Text: Replacing state required school property taxes with state revenues generating an equivalent hold harmless amount for schools through one or more of the following options: repealing sales tax exemptions not specifically excluded; increasing sales tax rate up to one percentage point; spending reductions; other revenue options created by the Legislature. Limiting subject matter of laws granting future exemptions. Limiting annual increases in assessment of nonhomestead real property. Lowering property tax millage rate for schools.
[Last modified: Apr 28, 2008 03:53 PM]
Comments on this article
|
by Rich
|
Apr 28, 2008 3:53 PM
|
|
When/where are the cities/counties going to cut their budgets?It is about time they start laying off some people;I don't mean just not filling positions.Cut back on salaries,they gave reticulous increases for years. $300M because of loopho
|
|
by Paul
|
Apr 27, 2008 1:50 PM
|
|
Finally, some much needed relief, I hope 60% of the vote is for the swap. Homeowners are being crushed my insurance and taxes. It is about time for a change. The old system of taxing is not working.
|
|
by Jay
|
Apr 27, 2008 1:50 PM
|
|
If you think your children's education is sub-par now - you better hope taxes get "replaced" pdq, or the worst is yet to come. You might have to drive your kid to school AND feed it lunch.
|
|
by Dale
|
Apr 27, 2008 11:51 AM
|
|
Next they'll decide schools should have bake sales, car washes, and rummage sales for all their funding. Who put these bozos in charge, anyway? NO! NO! NO! We need to have a steady, reliable, adequate source for funding schools. No vouchers, no
|
|
by Francis
|
Apr 25, 2008 4:49 PM
|
|
I agree with everything in the ballot language except "Other revenue options created by the legislature". This is like asking us to sign a blank check. Sales taxes are less regressive than other taxes because they are spread over more peop
|
|
by Suse
|
Apr 25, 2008 4:48 PM
|
|
This is probably it folks, if we don't say yes to this - we probably won't get any tax relief. The politicos will just assume we were happy with Amend 1 and will not revisit the tax situation. We need to show them that we need relief
|
|
by Nancy
|
Apr 25, 2008 4:45 PM
|
|
The pros for this action would be that everyone, not just property owners would bear the cost.
The cons are that the cost of so food, gas, etc. are already insurmountable.
|
|
by brad
|
Apr 25, 2008 2:56 PM
|
|
I will vote yes. I'm tired of property owners paying the bill for everyone. Let everybody chip in. No more free rides!
|
|
by Michael
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
We are finally getting somewhere. Why would services be exempt???
All governments have to cut back. Are they blind to the fact that property values have dropped dramatically and that construction and real estate have come to a halt !!!
|
|
by James
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
I am absolutely against raising the sales tax. Every tax expert that I have read considers the sales tax to be regressive.
|
|
by Tom
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
The State did impose a services tax in 1987 not tried to. They repealed it after a year of complaints. If this is not going to include services, then say so. Don't call it radioactive, just delete it. McKay is a shifty politician as we all know.
|
|
by Larry
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
Let me get this straight, Florida already ranks as one of the worst states for educating our children and now we are going to remove the funding? Brilliant idea! Who are these idiots who meet every 20 years?
|
|
by geezer
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
This sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. It isn't clear at all what we would be voting for or what the ramifications would be. Ballot initiatives should not be this confusing.
|
|
by Debbie
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:34 AM
|
|
I don't really care how you do it. Property taxation needs to be assessed the SAME FOR EVERYONE. Get rid of SOH - it's discriminatory. And learn to live within your means. Throwing money at everything doesn't make it better!
|
|
by Rex
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:34 AM
|
|
In the end, the schools will need x amount of dollars to run, and those dollars have to come from somewhere. As a homeowner with no kids, I like the idea of a sales tax increase to fund schools. Everyone buys things, not everyone owns a home.
|
|
by JT
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:34 AM
|
|
YES!
|
|
by Ken
|
Apr 25, 2008 11:34 AM
|
|
We will now see the special interest groups roll out all the stops to derail this proposal. The people of Florida will not be fooled. Let the politicians do their job and work with the funds the people can afford to provide.
|
|
by Kay
|
Apr 25, 2008 10:06 AM
|
|
"other revenue options created by the Legislature" to this, I say NO
|
|
by Bud
|
Apr 25, 2008 10:05 AM
|
|
I like it! Renters and snowbirds can participate in supporting public education, not just property owners.
|
|
by june
|
Apr 25, 2008 10:02 AM
|
|
Vote yes, however Rubio was correct a cap was necessary. Did not go far enough to protect property owners from future increases.
|
|
by jackie
|
Apr 25, 2008 10:01 AM
|
|
Property owners need relief. Crist did nothing. They need relief NOW! Vote absolute YES
|
|
by Steve
|
Apr 25, 2008 9:59 AM
|
|
I wuestion the mentality of some people, they will pay less proeprty tax, have more money to spend , they will share the lost property tax revenue with tourists , the balance of the VAT tax must be worked out , it is not rocket science!
|
|
by Lin
|
Apr 25, 2008 9:55 AM
|
|
Interesting that realtors and stock brokers have special tax-exempt status.
Who are these commissioners really representing?
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|