Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Unopposed judges quietly keep their seats

By Lucy Morgan, Times Senior Correspondent
In print: Saturday, May 3, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

TALLAHASSEE — Quietly and with little public notice, more than 250 judges as well as two dozen state attorneys and public defenders won re-election Friday as the qualifying period for judicial offices ended.

Among the winners are Pinellas-Pasco State Attorney Bernie McCabe and Public Defender Bob Dillinger, and Hillsborough State Attorney Mark Ober and Public Defender Julianne Holt.

They and hundreds of judges should all thank former Miami Dade Circuit Judge Martin D. Kahn, a veteran jurist who was defeated by 2,700 votes by a political newcomer when he sought re-election in 2000.

Kahn's defeat ginned up so much sympathy among state lawmakers that they quietly tucked a little amendment in an elections bill as it passed on the final night of the 2002 legislative session.

Instead of qualifying for public office with other state candidates in July of every year, the judges would file their paperwork in May, when federal candidates qualify.

Former Rep. Dudley Goodlette, R-Naples, offered the measure as part of a larger amendment. Contacted earlier this week, Goodlette said the issue had been raised because of Kahn's defeat. Sitting judges wanted time to clear their calendars and campaign if they faced opponents, Goodlette said.

"The rumor was that if they moved judicial qualifying, then maybe nobody would notice," recalled Secretary of State Kurt Browning, who was Pasco elections supervisor in 2002 and lobbying lawmakers for improved elections laws.

For the qualifying that closed Friday, there were 283 circuit judge positions statewide. Twenty-three of those are open seats and will be contested.

Of the 260 remaining seats, only eight will be contested. The other 252 won unopposed.

Brad King, the state attorney in Hernando, and Howard "Skip" Babb Jr., the public defender, also drew no opposition.

Two of the state's top prosecutors, Lawson Lamar of Orange County and Norm Wolfinger of Brevard County, qualified to seek re-election. Wolfinger is unopposed and Lamar drew a little-known criminal defense lawyer as an opponent.

Lamar and Wolfinger are among the state's top double dippers.

Lamar "retired" in 2005 without leaving office. He collected $514,927 in lump sum benefits, plus a $115,752 a year pension, plus an annual salary of $153,140.

Wolfinger followed suit in 2007. He collected $447,834 in lump sum benefits, plus an $83,484 a year pension, plus an annual salary of $153,140.

Circuit judges are paid $145,080.

Only two incumbent circuit judges in the Tampa Bay area drew opposition, both in Tampa: Judge Kevin Carey is opposed by lawyer Catherine M. Catlin, and Judge Martha Cook drew opposition from Constance Daniels.

The other contested races are for open seats.

Few incumbents have lost since Florida began electing judges in nonpartisan races in the 1970s, but the early qualifying date lets even more avoid opposition, according to a review of election results over the past 12 years.

Judges frequently escape opposition because only lawyers can run for the jobs, and few lawyers are willing to risk angering a judge before whom they must appear. In recent years few incumbent circuit judges have faced opposition, and only five have been defeated.

In 2005, lobbyists for the state's prosecutors and public defenders got legislators to move their qualifying to May as well, putting all judicial system races up for grabs much earlier than the traditional qualifying period, which usually begins in July.

This year, qualifying for other state candidates begins June 16 because primaries are Aug. 26, a week earlier than in past years.

Supreme Court and District Court justices run under a merit retention system. No judge has been denied another term since the merit retention system was adopted in the 1970s.

On the Supreme Court this year, only Justice Charles T. Wells faces voters. Twenty-three judges from the five district courts of appeal will also be on the ballot.

Times researcher John Martin contributed to this report.

Lucy Morgan can be reached

at lmorgan@sptimes.com

or (850) 224-7263.


>>fast facts

Sixth Circuit

Incumbents re-elected without opposition

State Attorney Bernie McCabe

Public Defender Bob Dillinger

Circuit Judges

Lauren Laughlin

Raymond O. Gross

W. Lowell Bray Jr.

Pamela A.M. Campbell

Walt Logan

Mark Shames

Stanley R. Mills

Shawn Crane

Linda H. Babb

Jack R. St. Arnold

Anthony Rondolino

Bruce Boyer

Tim Peters

John A. Schaefer

Daniel D. Diskey

Linda Allan

George M. Jirotka

Walter L. Schafer Jr.

Thane Bobbitt Covert

Circuit Judge races

Group 6, open seat

Violet M. Assaid

Mary Handsel

Bruce G. Howie

Group 8, open seat

Kenneth Foote

Susan L. Gardner

Robert Angus Williams

>>fast facts

Fifth Circuit

Incumbents re-elected without opposition:

State Attorney Brad King

Public Defender Howard "Skip" Babb Jr.

Circuit judges

Richard Tombrink Jr.

Mark J. Hill

William Jack Singbush

Jonathan D. Ohlman

Don F. Briggs

Jack Springstead

G. Richard Singeltary

Sandra Edwards-Stephens

T. Michael Johnson

Brian D. Lambert

Curtis J. Neal

Steve Rushing

Carol A. Falvey

Mark A. Nacke

Circuit Judge races

Group 11

Richard A. Howard, incumbent

Rhonda Portwood

Group 3, open seat

Sandy Hawkins

Michael Lamberti

Denise Lyn

>>fast facts

13th Circuit

Incumbents re-elected without opposition

Mark Ober, State Attorney

Julianne Holt, Public Defender

Circuit Court

Manuel Menendez Jr., Chief Judge of the Circuit Court, Group 19

Marva L. Crenshaw, Group 4

Daniel L. Perry, Group 5

James Arnold, Group 8

Greg Holder, Group 9

Rex Martin Barbas, Group 10

Ralph C. Stoddard, Group 11

Charlene Edwards Honeywell, Group 12

Jack Espinosa Jr., Group 13

Claudia Rickert Isom, Group 15

Chet A. Tharpe, Group 18

Sam D. Pendino, Group 20

Vivian Corvo Maye, Group 27

William P. Levens, Group 28

Wayne S. Timmerman, Group 29

Richard A. Nielsen, Group 31

Katherine G. Essrig, Group 33

James M. Barton II, Group 34

Herbert J. Baumann, Jr., Group 35

Michelle Sisco, Group 38

Steven Scott Stephens, Group 39

Christopher C. Sabella, Group 40

Daniel H. Sleet, Group 41

County Court

Cheryl K. Thomas, Group 2

Eric R. Myers, Group 7

John N. Conrad, Group 9

Margaret Taylor Courtney, Group 16

Lawrence Lefler, Group 17

circuit judge Races

Group 1

Caroline J. Tesche

Jason Montes

Group 2

Samantha Ward

Miriam Velez

Group 7

J. Kevin Carey (incumbent)

Catherine M. Catlin

Group 21

Lisa D. Campbell

Linda Courtney Clark

Group 30

Martha J. Cook (incumbent)

Constance Daniels


[Last modified: May 05, 2008 01:54 PM]



Comments on this article
by annoyed May 5, 2008 1:54 PM
Oh Chip, for heaven's sake! Before you jump all over the judiciary, read the article. Lamar and Wolfinger are not Judges.
by Carol May 5, 2008 1:34 PM
Public defenders need more training before they take on important cases. My nephew's PD told him to make a plea agreement. Turns out the "evidence" against him was ALL hearsay from questionable witnesses. PD's treat this as their
by non-marxist May 5, 2008 10:17 AM
good lord. i can't believe i keep reading this site/paper. i've never seen such anti-establishment, pro-proletariat views. i feel nauseous.
by Allan May 5, 2008 9:27 AM
Though my last post met the 250 limit, I was cut off. My pointing to Karl Marx's prediction that police statism in politics follows centralization of capital in economics was to say, whoops!, here it is, no real electoral competition allowed.
by kb May 5, 2008 9:27 AM
if nobody is running against them, they run unopposed. i don't see it as being a problem. this is democracy in action.
by Robert May 5, 2008 9:25 AM
This article is not worthy of the reporter, who has had a long and illustrious career. It is snide and appears to be factually inaccurate; the Division's website states 13 incumbent circuit judges are opposed. And,lawyers know the qualifyi
by Keith May 5, 2008 9:15 AM
Hold on a minute Lucy. Lawyers are not aware of the May judicial qualifying .... really? And lawyers are not willing to risk angering judges they might have to appear before. Where did this theory come from? Please include some back-up informat
by Chip May 4, 2008 11:37 PM
Boy, no wonder Lamar and Wolfinger want this to fly under the radar. They are making a killing off of taxpayers. Another excellent job, Lucy Morgan. Maybe you can start digging into their rulings and see how effective they are at justice.
by Tim May 4, 2008 12:31 PM
If the SP Times is so concerned about unopposed jurists and prosecutors, why do you do this piece on the day after qualifying. Sounds like you want an issue more than more than opposition for incumbants. You people think we're stupid.
by Tom May 4, 2008 12:30 PM
The public outcry is underwhelming.
by Mac May 4, 2008 12:11 PM
Hope Ric Howard loses his election AND about $250,000 of his own money in his election campaign. He should set aside a couple of dollars for the employment agency he'll need after election.
by Peso May 4, 2008 12:10 PM
I can't believe that some of our esteemed honorable law professionals are involved in the art of double dipping. I am astounded.
by Nath May 4, 2008 12:10 PM
Anyone honestly seeking a judgeship begins the campaign at least in January, well before the qualifing date,rather than sandbagging until July. The public might not know the new qualifying date, but all judicial candidates certainly do. Media hype!
by Tom May 4, 2008 12:02 PM
Thank goodness someone is running against that nutcase judge Rick Howard in Citrus county. He needs to go. Justice would be served by his removal.
by Ray of Sunshine May 4, 2008 11:52 AM
The election process is not the problem, it's the appointments. Under Jeb the rules changed to the governor appointing all of the nominating committee. Political hacks who had never seen a courtroom became judges and now you can't get rid o
by nosear (reason spelled backwards). May 4, 2008 11:47 AM
the heading is so biased. Who would want a lawyer that didn't research the filing date for qualifying to run, what an idiot he would be. As for the comments about rumor that is just rumor, a game children play,rumors have no value and carry no
by Pete May 4, 2008 11:45 AM
This makes a mockery of democracy. "Secret" Elections? I was the victim of a felony that Mr McCabe refused to prosecute. I intended to tell my fellow citizens in the election but now find it was held in secret! This is ridiculous.
by Sim May 4, 2008 11:45 AM
Politicians protecting each others backs. There is nothing worse then a judge or any politician that feels invincible in office. They should all be opposed.
by Pete May 4, 2008 11:45 AM
Looking at the annual salaries and pensions of thse fat cats at the top of the judicial system, it's easy to see where the bulk of our tax dollars go in providing justice in this state.It's time to change the legislation governing judges sa
by tash May 4, 2008 11:43 AM
i noticed you highlighted two of the "top" double-dippers, but you didn't mention whether any locals are also double-dipping. pure cowardice.
by rick May 4, 2008 11:39 AM
I heard about lawyers (fear) of opposing a sitting judge should they lose. We have so real jerks ass judges. The other tactic used is to overload voters with too much to think on-so they escape scrutiny. Reports as the Times did, keep
by Allan May 3, 2008 1:08 PM
Karl Marx predicted that capital would centralize into a tiny class of hands. Politics would, in his view, follow. Gradually, from "democracy," a centralized police state in the interests of a handful of the ruling rich would result. Her
by Adam May 3, 2008 1:03 PM
This is confusing. If lawyers run for judgeships, wouldn't they know when the qualifying date is? I'm not sure changing the date 8 years ago caused so many unopposed elections this year.
by Jim May 3, 2008 1:03 PM
You'll get about 250 comments on the Bucs' practice squad additions, but probably just a handful on something that matters like this. A sad commentary on our society.
by edna May 3, 2008 12:56 PM
Sorry, I respectfully disagree with the slant this article has. Of course only lawyers can run for judge! What, you want doctors or truck drivers? Also, anyone eligible to run for a judge spot (ie lawyers) knows when the cutoff is.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT