Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Politics: State
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message

Compromise in Florida's delegate dispute may be ahead

By Adam C. Smith, Times Political Editor
In print: Monday, May 12, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

In a sign that the impasse over giving Florida a voice in the Democratic nomination finally may be breaking, both Democratic presidential campaigns are starting to broach compromise plans publicly.

Democratic National Committee member Allan Katz of Tallahassee said the Barack Obama campaign authorized him to suggest to the Florida Democratic Party on Friday that it propose a compromise plan that would let Hillary Rodham Clinton net about 10 delegates out of Florida. He got nowhere with the state party, but on Sunday the Clinton campaign for the first time signaled publicly that it might accept something other than Florida's getting all of its delegates seated at the convention.

"The party took away 100 percent of the delegates. The rule is 50 percent,'' Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe told Tim Russert on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. "Had they only taken away 50 percent like the Republican Party did, Tim, you and I would not be having this conversation today."

Clinton's path to the nomination looks more and more improbable, but she has vowed to stay in the race at least until the party resolves the mess it faces with Florida's and Michigan's delegations. The DNC stripped the states' 366 delegates for holding primaries earlier than allowed by the national party.

Florida's delegation situation could be resolved May 31 when a DNC rules committee considers appeals by DNC member Jon Ausman of Tallahassee, who contends that the panel overstepped its authority last August when it stripped away all of Florida's delegates.

Ausman said in an e-mail to Democrats on Sunday that after talking to key Democrats in the Washington area this weekend, he is convinced the DNC rules panel will restore some of Florida's 211 delegates May 31.

It could be in Obama's interest to have a compromise plan in the works sooner, however, because his campaign is planning a multi­day campaign swing through Florida just after the May 20 Oregon primary. Without a deal on Florida's delegates, Obama could find himself in America's biggest battleground state explaining why Democrats in Guam have more say in the presidential nomination than the 1.75-million Floridians who voted in the Democratic primary.

Local supporters have been talking for weeks about an Obama rally in Tampa, but the campaign said Sunday that nothing has been confirmed.

The closer Obama comes to the nomination, the better the prospects are for resolving Florida and Michigan's situation because they are unlikely to provide enough delegates to make a difference.

Had Florida's Jan. 29 primary counted fully, Clinton would have a net gain of 38 delegates. Cutting Florida's pledged delegates in half would reduce her Florida take to either 19 or six, depending on the DNC formula used.

Michigan is a trickier problem because Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot, but a group of party leaders has proposed that 59 delegates go to Obama and 69 go to Clinton.

Katz, who suspects Florida party leaders are biased toward Clinton, said Florida Democratic executive director Leonard Joseph on Friday brushed off his suggestion that the Florida Democratic Party propose a similar plan. Joseph, who did not respond to a request for comment, also dismissed Katz's request that the state party at least postpone until June a scheduled Saturday election of 40 more delegates to the convention.

"They're behaving like idiots. It's like they continue to operate in a parallel universe,'' Katz said of Florida party leaders who seem to expect that all 211 delegates will be restored.

A Democratic Party spokesman stressed that the party has worked hard to be even-handed throughout the process.

"The state party has been working with the DNC to build the foundation for the Democratic nominee's general election campaign in Florida so that what happened in 2004 doesn't happen again," said Florida Democratic Party spokesman Mark Bubriski. "The party has never taken anyone's side in this race — except the side of the people of Florida."

Adam C. Smith can be reached at asmith@sptimes.com or (727) 893-8241.



[Last modified: May 13, 2008 03:22 PM]



Comments on this article
by Edna May 13, 2008 3:22 PM
To Sarah, who points out: "1st Obama stops any revotes that would have been paid for by private donors now he wants more delegates than he deserves...": FYI, that's all part of his "new politics", which seems a lot like sleazy old politics.
by Edna May 13, 2008 11:30 AM
I've already commented but had to pop back in to say: I'm with Kate 100%!!!!! What she said! You go, girl!
by GH May 13, 2008 9:54 AM
There goes Obama, trying to toss out or steal FL again. Now he'll show up in Tampa and expect us to be an ATM for him.
by Sarah May 13, 2008 9:20 AM
First obama stops any revotes that would have been paid for by private donors now he wants more delegates than he deserves, he campaigned here rules say he GETS NONE! Floridians stand your ground he is campaigning here as though he won, PROTEST HIM!
by bird May 12, 2008 8:40 PM
Why the heck do they have super delegates? Doesn't that dilute the voice of the people?
by Kate May 12, 2008 7:43 PM
Anything not based on our vote is unacceptable. I would rather no delegates be seated. This man deserves nothing for what he has done to block re-vote and the ridicule he has given about our state on live TV.
by JM May 12, 2008 7:43 PM
No votes should count.The Dems broke the rules.Now they should suffer for their screw up.When there is an election problem in Fl the Dems are always behind it.
by Robin May 12, 2008 3:30 PM
If any votes are going to count at all, they should allow Florida and Michigan to vote again. Do you realize how many people didn't vote at all, whether for Clinton or Obama because they thought the votes wouldnt count? I say have a do-over.
by Hank May 12, 2008 3:17 PM
It is great to be a Dem. They whine about 2000 and "disenfranchisement" yet they totally disenfranchise their own. Jon Ausman and Dr. Dean... what a pair.
by Luke May 12, 2008 3:05 PM
Oh please, those useless people at the state party have done nothing but milk the FDP's donor base. The FDP couldn't win dog-catcher if it tried.
by Linda May 12, 2008 3:04 PM
Resign yourself to the fact that the DNC delegates are falling all over themselves to hand Obama the nomination - thereby handing the GOP the presidency. And thanks to them, we'll be stuck with 4 more years of Republican domination...not leadership.
by Edna May 12, 2008 1:27 PM
The only Q is: should the delegates (or half) be restored? There's NO question that, if so, it should be based on the election RESULTS & not on some backroom deal that is acceptable to both candidates. It's about the voters, not the candidates.
by robert May 12, 2008 1:25 PM
why should mrs clinton on get 10 delagates and that b/s obama get the rest when he lost the election .i want my vote to count for hillary .and mich obama should not get no delagates because he took his name off the ballet so hillary should get all
by Russ May 12, 2008 1:20 PM
Why would any delegates go to a candidate that did not even run in an election? Perhaps all the delegates should just go to Obama? Why can't the DNC just follow it's own rules and allocate 50% of the delegates to whomever was voted for? D = Dean NC
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT