Detours: a country in search of direction
On the eve of the election, a reporter and photographer set out for Washington, via America. We tell stories from seven towns, touching on seven issues from politics and real life.
Friday Night Rewind It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
Farmland like this, where workers shred sugar cane near Lake Okeechobee this month, could be converted into reservoirs and water-filtering areas under a deal between the state and U.S. Sugar. The surprising deal is to be announced today.
In a surprise move environmentalists call "breathtaking," U.S. Sugar Corp. plans to announce today a deal to sell the state 187,000 acres in the Everglades for $1.75-billion.
If approved, it would be the largest conservation purchase the state has ever made, helping restore the ecosystem's natural flow and providing a quantum leap to the effort to clean up the Everglades.
"It's like the Louisiana Purchase for the Everglades," said John Marshall of the Arthur R. Marshall Foundation, an advocacy group.
The effect on U.S. Sugar is also profound. A force in Florida's economy and politics for decades, the Clewiston company could cease to exist in about five years.
The farmland, currently used for sugar cane and citrus production, is sprinkled around the south end of Lake Okeechobee. It would be converted into reservoirs and water-filtering areas. The state could trade parts to competing sugar interests for other property deemed vital to the restoration effort.
Company executives plan a 10:30 a.m. announcement in Loxahatchee along with the South Florida Water Management District and Gov. Charlie Crist.
"It would be breathtaking in its significance and priceless in value," said Kirk Fordham, chief executive officer of the Everglades Foundation. "It would be a once-in-a-generation opportunity that would move Everglades restoration beyond all expectations."
The deal, hashed out in secrecy over recent months, would be the state's largest land purchase, surpassing the 74,000-acre Babcock Ranch acquisition in Charlotte and Lee counties in 2006, then considered the biggest conservation feat.
It towers over the last Everglades purchase, when the state paid $133-million in 1999 to St. Joe Co. for the 50,000-acre Talisman Sugar Plantation.
Put another way, the 187,000 acres is larger than Pinellas County, which has a land mass of almost 180,000 acres.
"This is monumental, an unprecedented opportunity," said Jennifer Conner, a senior policy adviser at the Nature Conservancy.
Eric Draper of Audubon of Florida called the purchase the "missing link" in the restoration project, because it would connect the Everglades with Lake Okeechobee.
"This deal brings a commonsense idea to the table," Draper said.
The entire restoration effort is the largest of its kind in the world, attempting to undo and reroute decades of flood control projects that have diverted water to make way for growth. What's left of the ecosystem is about half the original size.
In 1999, state and federal officials unveiled a multibillion-dollar plan to return the Everglades to a semblance of its former self. The plan required capturing water before it reached the ocean and rerouting it through the Everglades.
Because of many delays, some of the restoration plan's crucial elements are already six years behind schedule, and the cost has ballooned, according to a Government Accountability Office report released in July. Through 2006, the federal government spent $2.3-billion on Everglades restoration, while Florida spent $4.8-billion.
Environmental groups and the state have long envied the U.S. Sugar property only to be rebuffed by the company. Now, for reasons that were still unclear Monday, the company has decided to change course.
Neither U.S. Sugar nor the governor's office would comment on the deal Monday. A few environmental leaders were still in pleasant disbelief it would happen, stunned such a major deal could be hatched in secret.
The $1.75-billion price tag is tentative as the state will have to appraise the property, as is required by law. U.S. Sugar would lease it back for about five years, offsetting some of the cost.
Property taxes paid by people in 16 counties served by the South Florida Water Management District would be leveraged to issue bonds to help raise the money.
Information from the Associated Press was used in this report.
187,000
Number of acres U.S. Sugar plans to sell
179,200
The land mass in acres of Pinellas County
$1.75B
The price the state has agreed to pay
700,000
Approximate amount of tons of cane sugar U.S. Sugar produces in a year
By the numbers
187,000: Number of acres U.S. Sugar plans to sell
179,200: The land mass, in acres, of Pinellas County
$1.75-billion: The price the state has agreed to pay
700,000: Approximate amount of tons of cane sugar U.S. Sugar produces in a year
[Last modified: Jun 30, 2008 12:51 PM]
Comments on this article
by Allen
Jun 25, 2008 12:01 PM
I am all for conservation. However if I am correct with my facts this land could as well produce 130 million gallons of ethanol a year. This process is already in use in Brazil and works.Something to think about during your next $100.00 pump visit.
by Randy
Jun 25, 2008 12:01 PM
It seems like some folks don't understand how this will positively impact rainfall and water issues that affect the whole state. That ecosystem is connected to rain & whether patterns that are important for ALL Floridians.
by richardschumacher
Jun 25, 2008 12:00 PM
This is an excellent bargain for US Sugar: they get bought out just a little before rising sea levels ruin their business.
by Jerry
Jun 25, 2008 10:56 AM
Over $9300.00 an acre for swampland. How many more billions is it going to take to clean up the 'enviromental' mess down there. I guess this is the way for them to get out of paying for all the contamination they have done over the years.
by mick
Jun 25, 2008 10:56 AM
when the big wigs of sugar die they will have to screw them in the ground!they are so crooked.hang them all with charley.
by Dale Krumreich
Jun 25, 2008 10:56 AM
I think this is a great idea. I would also like to see the publicity from this launch a movement to get these ridiculous sugar subsides stopped. There can't be that many politicians with a vested interest in this issue
by Angry USF Student
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
So we just lost one of our top professors because of the budget cut and here we are paying $1.75 billion for this land?! How about using some of that money to help the professors pay for printing paper so they wouldn't leave?
by JM
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
Wouldn't it make sense to grow the sugar cane to make ethanol?Even though ethanol is not the answer.Cut peoples jobs and education to make the environmentalist happy!Grow less crops to jack up the price of food.Stick it to us again politicians.
by rita
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
If this land is sold and the 700,000 tons of cane sugar is not produced, then who will close that gap? Who grows the sugar cane? Who gets the money for that? Where do the workers of US Sugar go to work?
by Beau
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
This is a sad day for the state of Florida. We need to tell Crist that we are not happy. Send an email letting him know this. Charlie.Crist@MyFlorida.com
by pj
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
What sad idea. All that money. What about the schools and I would just like to know how much taxes do these sugar growers pay in taxes and what are they hurting..Keep their land and use the money for education and the economy.
by Steve
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
Screw the taxpayer again
by Annsborough
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
Order in the courts. This and other Land dealings in the secretive courts of Florida must cease and desist, immediately.
by Billy
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
Would Governor Crist have paid almost $10,000 an acre if the Bush Family didn't own most of the land by means of their holdings in U.S. Sugar?
And how did Governor Crist get the right to VIOLATE the Florida Sunshine Act and do this in secret?
by Mike
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
And what will happen to the hundreds of jobs both directly and indirectly effected? The article above mentions nothing of that. Guess those people .... and the whole town of Clewiston for that matter ... really do not matter.
by MJM
Jun 25, 2008 10:55 AM
State employees haven't been given a raise in over two years because the state is "broke". We have the smallest state government in the country but we're still laying people off because the state has no money. I voted for Crist but won't do it again
by Ray
Jun 25, 2008 10:54 AM
Bad deal for all Floridians, 187k acres will come off the tax rolls and the cost to purchase this will be added to every homeowners tax bill. Why not suspend the gas tax statewide?
by Charles
Jun 24, 2008 5:58 PM
Why exactly are ONLY those in 16 counties being required to pay for this. That is not going to happen and it will end up in court. What kind of BS is this that something like this is not being paid for by the whole state.
by Robert
Jun 24, 2008 5:58 PM
What?!!? We drastically cut money for higher education and schools then go out and buy 187,000 acres?????
by Barbara
Jun 24, 2008 5:58 PM
It's outrageous to do this at a time when the state is in such dire staights. Charlie Crist has got to go.
by Lisa
Jun 24, 2008 5:58 PM
Crist is a terrible governor who should be recalled.
by jack
Jun 24, 2008 5:58 PM
I would like to know how US Sugar wound up with 187,000 acres.......
by brian
Jun 24, 2008 5:44 PM
bad deal.. obama wins in november cuba will be open to the us , sugar will plummet in value. this is a shrewd deal by US sugar . they'll take the money and run to oil futures .if we wait a year or two the cost of this land will be one
tenth of now
by Steve
Jun 24, 2008 5:44 PM
Given the cost of tariffs that have supported the sugar industry, their days were numbered. This is better than developing the land with more infrastructure. A good use of tax dollars and one of the few things our grandchildren will thank us for.
by Beau
Jun 24, 2008 5:44 PM
A sad day for Florida Agriculture and for the food supply of the United States. I guess our food will be like oil in a few years.
by Todd
Jun 24, 2008 5:44 PM
Oh yeah Baby, that taxpayer leveraged bond issue is where Christ and his buddies haul in the real green they’re after.
by andrea
Jun 24, 2008 5:44 PM
absolutely wonderful! now, what can we do about this drilling, charlie?
by Bryant
Jun 24, 2008 5:43 PM
more jobs over seas. This will take Muck City off the map in 10 years.
by Rodney
Jun 24, 2008 5:43 PM
Did you people even read the article? No property taxes are being raised.
by voxy
Jun 24, 2008 5:43 PM
when will the development begin?
Come ON yall knew he was going to do this when you
'elected' him. big sugar was his biggest contributor, no?? He and gallagher.
Sugary boys.
Buh bye florida. state owned land is B A D.
by Dude
Jun 24, 2008 5:43 PM
After working for sugar over 5 yrs it has not been that bad. It just shows that you should not count on something you have no control over. It's sad for the people in the town when that is all they know. This place will go donw also.
by Anne
Jun 24, 2008 1:26 PM
Amazing that they can find the money to pay big sugar a HUGE sum for this land, yet we have cuts on top of cuts across the board in state agencies. Save the Everglades, sure, but come on...get real with the price of the land!
by Alice
Jun 24, 2008 1:25 PM
Hooray! At last the aligators will have more room to roam--What a horrendous waste of taxpayers money--Oh,
well, just raise taxes AGAIN. We all know that swamp creatures are more important than homeowners...
by Slyvester
Jun 24, 2008 1:25 PM
Way to go, Gov., step 2: raise taxes on non resident property owners to pay for this swamp land. By the way, ask former Gov. Bush to write a thank you for increasing his retirement fund. Crooks, ALL.
by Jose
Jun 24, 2008 1:24 PM
Wonderful news !!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.