Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message
Validation Code
Hear
validation
code
  Enter validation code

Pay Buffett now for chance to pay him later

By Howard Troxler, Times Columnist
In print: Thursday, July 10, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

You and I — let's call us "schmoes" — will now be paying $224-million to Warren Buffett — let's call him "one of the richest guys in the world."

The state of Florida decided the other day to ask Buffett to take our money, which he no doubt will.

Now, what are we buying? A nice chunk of his company, Berkshire Hathaway? No.

We are buying the right to borrow money from him later, in case a really big hurricane (or series of hurricanes) hits Florida this year.

If we get Andrew-sized damage, then Buffett agrees to lend us up to $4-billion by buying our bonds.

(The state says there is about a 3 percent chance of that happening.)

If we don't get that hit — well, we're out the $224-million. But we'll have had the security of knowing his money was there for us.

This is why Warren Buffett is one of the richest guys in the world, and we are schmoes.

In the lingo of the market, what Florida is buying is called a "put option." We are buying the right to borrow money later. This is one big honker of a put. We are paying top dollar for it, too.

The decision was made last week by Gov. Charlie Crist, by Florida's chief financial officer, Alex Sink, and by Attorney General Bill McCollum.

The governor is always cheerful, but Sink and McCollum were not.

"This is not a good deal overall," McCollum said. But he called it "the only responsible choice at the moment."

"We waited until the last minute," Sink said, noting Florida is already more than a month into the hurricane season. "We're not thinking ahead. This is not the way to run policy."

Here is the immediate problem: Florida has a hurricane catastrophe fund, called the "Cat Fund," that kicks in if a storm is bad enough.

But we would have to borrow most of that money, and pay it off by future assessments on insurance policies.

In theory, this works.

In practice, we are at the mercy of the markets. We might not be able to borrow that much on the spot. So we looked around for safe options and came up with Buffett.

I asked Dr. Jack E. Nicholson, director of the Cat Fund, if this was the ideal way to do things.

He said no, but it is the right thing to do now. There has been a lot of upheaval in the state's investment setup —there was a big scandal; you might have heard of it. Florida has been racing in recent months to redo things.

With more time, the state could line up its options earlier. Maybe we wouldn't be paying top dollar to Warren Buffett for a put option at the last minute. Maybe.

Here's another thing: Earlier this year, Sink proposed changing the rules for the Cat Fund to reduce Florida's exposure by $3-billion or so. But the Legislature didn't like it because it might have led to a small increase in premiums.

Oh, and here's one more thing: The governor, a "let's pay later" fellow, decided we will pay Buffett out of what cash we have in the Cat Fund now, instead of dunning everybody's insurance policy.

Nicholson sounded like a guy I could kid, so I told him: "If we get that storm, you'll be the smartest guy in the world. If we don't, you'll be the idiot who gave $224-million to Warren Buffett for nothing."

He said that for Florida's sake, he hopes he is the second guy instead of the first. I hope so, too.



[Last modified: Jul 16, 2008 04:04 PM]



Comments on this article
by KK Jul 16, 2008 4:04 PM
I don't think there was enough negotiating done. How long is this 'put option' good for?...til the end of the year, then I say "NO"! Eternity? How about some of that money back later if it goes unused? Not a terrible idea, but needs some tweaking.
by david Jul 12, 2008 8:51 PM
if sink and mccollum really wanted to say no: how did such an idea get approved four people on cabinet vote would be 2-2: good job ms sink and you call yourself the chief financial officer ha
by preston Jul 11, 2008 9:01 PM
wow a month into hurricane season we make a deal like this are we damn fools no just polications spending money that dont belong to them. no wonder the rich continue to gety richer and the rest of us just work harder, what a sham
by JH Skyscrapercity Jul 11, 2008 8:52 PM
Why is a private person or company doing what the govt (eg, the community) should be doing for itself, and eschewing the profit margin needlessly paid to do things we can do much better ourselves, minus the unmitigated greed.
by Citizen Jul 11, 2008 8:44 PM
This is just plain STUPID.I'm glad that I DID NOT VOTE FOR CRIST. IF a CAT 5 wipes out FL, LET THE STATE GO BACK TO THE OCEAN. we cant afford to live here Thanks Tallahassee and most of us will MOVE AWAY the second the housing market bounces back.
by Get Real Jul 11, 2008 8:41 PM
And I hear CHARLIE never owned a home so what does he care? Career Politician, now rushing into marriage for image sake. McCain Crist ticket? God help us.
by Ugh! Jul 11, 2008 8:41 PM
thoughts from politicians: How can I waste thy money, let me count the ways.
by Annoyed Jul 11, 2008 8:41 PM
And will the money we MAY get from Buffet be a GIFT out of the goodness of his wittle heart? NO WAY.
by Gio Jul 11, 2008 8:36 PM
whos getting some special favors somewhere? smells stank!
by Murf Jul 11, 2008 8:36 PM
You can thank our politicians for allowing Florida to be so over-developed that we are in crisis on every aspect of the economy. Too many people and not enough assets to manage them. Things are going to get worse, much worse. Stay tuned.
by Keith Jul 11, 2008 8:36 PM
Couldn't we have just promised him a few acres of the American Sugar land ?
by Melisa Jul 11, 2008 8:17 PM
As a barrier island resident, I am fully vested in this issue. A 1-year 5.6% premium for insurance would be high, but for a put option on a 3% risk is insane. Our legislators would fail the Math FCAT. Have they heard of opportunity cost analysis?
by Dave Jul 10, 2008 8:56 PM
The State of Florida is in this position only because of the poor decision making in Tallahassee. The reinsurance market is very expensive now and Citizens is having to scramble to maintain liquidity.
by JR Jul 10, 2008 8:41 PM
This is how insurance works, whether it's hazard or health or term life. If there's no claims, you've "wasted" the money buying the insurance. In term life, if you live past the term, you again "wasted" the money.
by Sasha Jul 10, 2008 8:34 PM
Is this deal only good for 2008? Think-zero hurricanes for the last 2 yrs. Had we done this before we'd be down .5 billion already! Why wasn't Fl.gov working on a smart solution before so we wouldn't have to "rush" now? Vote 'em ALL out in 2008.
by Jrad Jul 10, 2008 7:59 PM
anyone available to buy my house
by Chuck Jul 10, 2008 7:55 PM
As America continues to decline (that still includes FL; I think) these are the types of things we will see more and more of...mark my words.
by ENough Jul 10, 2008 7:45 PM
Just wish I was smart and rich enough to get this kind of deal. Is this for this year only? Do we have to anti up another $224-million to Buffet again next year? Or does this deal stand UNTIL we get hit by a major storm at some unknown day to come?
by Al Jul 10, 2008 6:26 PM
This is unbelievable. If the government would get out of the insurance business and let people pay market rates our tax dollars wouldn't be wasted.
by Mike Jul 10, 2008 5:47 PM
That's fine. But in that case I think we should stop paying for FEMA, which likely costs us more than $224 million, and they are a bunch of feckless buffoons. And insurance companies...they won't help out. They'll fight to the death to not pay up.
by Mark Jul 10, 2008 2:21 PM
Charlie is obviously ready for the VEEP position giving away that much money. No wonder he never was in the private sector
by Robert Jul 10, 2008 11:01 AM
Lee, what do you mean something for nothing? You must have missed the part that says that if the contract is exercised Buffet will be required to purchase 4 BILLION in state bonds.
by Albert Jul 10, 2008 10:58 AM
This type of deal is so stupid that I know it must be a joke? I'm surprised you would waste your readers time on a prank ???
by Jimmy G Jul 10, 2008 10:57 AM
I promise to loan you money if you pay me 300 million, a great deal folks.
by Ignatius Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Howard, Since this is such a bad idea and you have such a firm grasp on not only the vicissitudes of capital markets but also catastrophe modeling please let us know what YOU would recommend. Thank you
by R Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Are you sure the investment isn’t a “call” with the intrinsic value at 4 billion upon maturity? Is the investment a roll over, with the principal being the vehicle that pays the handling fees? The structure you suggest, sounds to simple.
by Freddy Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Wow! this is where out leaders have led us? Good deal for Mr B bad deal for all us schmoes, AGAIN. Is there an honest leader out there ANYWHERE? I Can't believe this was the only option left.
by Mikes Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
If we are worried about the reserves in the 'CAT' fund, shouldn't we issue the bonds now and park the proceeds in the 'CAT' fund? Looks as if we are going to need them some day; might as well get them there now....
by Bob Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Isn't this similar to giving the gov't $$ for a bond?? $224 million to get up to $4 billion....sounds like a pretty good deal to me.
by Bern Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Why do we keep putting people into government who don't know how to run a government but are smart enough to assure that they can retire early with hefty pensions.
by Jack Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
State shouldn't need this funding because people should take care of their own property. State would need less than 10% if people would live up to their own obligations.
by Luke Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
As a Berkshire Hathaway shareholder and a Florida resident with Citizens Insurance, i believe it is a fair deal for both sides. The State should reduce risks by strengthen legislation on the insurance industry. (State Farm, All State, Etc)
by Lee Jul 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Is this the same Populist toned Buffett who on June 26 slammed the current tax system which allows him to pay so little?He really does care about the little people paying taxes...especially those paying him millions for potentially nothing.
by since 1962 Jul 10, 2008 2:07 AM
Excelllent response to the joke.Several frustrating evacuations "for no reason" have enabled a similar response in this Floridian. Better planning must be demanded next year. Individual planning need not follow govts lead.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT